Skip to main content

Yonkers corruption trial focuses on the Longfellow project: a compromised witness with a gambling problem, some Spano mentions, and favors for another state Senator

The Yonkers corruption trial continued yesterday in federal court with a focus on the second project, Milio Management's Longfellow, rather than Forest City Ratner's Ridge Hill.

Unlike with Ridge Hill, prosecutors had a witness, Anthony Mangone, who claimed direct knowledge of payments to defendant Zehy Jereis, former Yonkers Republican Chairman, intended to influence defendant Sandy Annabi, then City Council Member, to greenlight the project. But that witness, given his criminal record, gambling habit, and admitted perjury, was vulnerable to defense attorneys.

Mangone, the third defendant indicted with Jereis and Annabi in early 2010, has already pleaded guilty to tax fraud and conspiracy charges, and is cooperating in an effort to reduce his prison sentence. And Mangone's testimony also implicated past acts, unrelated to this trial, by his political mentor Yonkers powerbroker Nick Spano, a former state Senator turned lobbyist, who recently pleaded guilty to tax charges.

Nick Spano is part of a local political dynasty that includes his brother Mike Spano, a former Assemblyman who worked as a lobbyist for Forest City Ratner on the Ridge Hill case, now serves as Yonkers mayor, and testified briefly in the trial last week.

Jereis says that payments he made to Annabi over the years were aimed to foster a personal relationship. Annabi, who denies such a relationship, says she changed her vote on the two projects because of concessions.

"I was concerned about my own well-being"

Perhaps the most telling bit of testimony yesterday came when Mangone explained to prosecutors some past evasive behavior when talking with Longfellow developer Franco Milio, who himself had signed a cooperation agreement with investigators and who Mangone thought was wearing a wire.

Mangone said he tried to steer Milio away from discussing the cash payments Milio passed on to him for Jereis.

Why, asked Assistant U.S. Attorney Perry Carbone.

"I was concerned about my own well-being," replied Mangone, who seemed straightforward and a bit resigned, though, given his record, defense lawyers surely have placed doubt about him.

Concern about personal well-being may well have motivated many of the parties in the case. Defense lawyers, for example, got former Forest City executive Bruce Bender to acknowledge that his own compensation would have been boosted thanks to the success of the Ridge Hill project.

Bender wasn't able to estimate a number, saying the formula was complex, based on future assessed value. By contrast, Bender's deputy and close associate, Scott Cantone, said he would not have benefited from such a bonus. Cantone is leaving Forest City Ratner soon to join Bender in a consulting firm.

The Longfellow payment

It turns out, as noted in Journal News coverage, Annabi trial: Mangone says lie protected Nick Spano; bribe testimony differs, that Mangone claimed that in 2006 the Milios passed on $20,000 in two installments to him to give to Jereis for Annabi; however, the Milios had said it was a $30,000 payment in one installment.

In the final question on direct examination from Carbone, Mangone said he'd told the FBI "that I had given

Earlier, he acknowledged, he'd told his law partners that "I was simply going to say the money given to Zehy was a consulting fee." (Note that Forest City Ratner hired Jereis as a consultant after Annabi's vote.)

As reported by the Journal News, Mangone "claimed Jereis told him Annabi had been 'hounding him for money'” that summer before she went on a trip to Jordan," and that Jereis first requested $100,000, but agreed to $20,000 since Mangone was expecting that sum as a “success fee.”

Going after the witness

In testimony I heard in the early afternoon, Jereis's lawyer, Anthony Siano, vigorously pressed Mangone, a lawyer now disbarred.

Did Mangone take courses in criminal law and professional responsibility, Siano asked, and take an oath of office?

The answer of course was yes.

"While you were attending St. John's [Law School], did the professors communicate that lying under oath was a bad thing to do?" asked Siano, whose style contains no small measure of sarcasm.

Yes, acknowledged Mangone. 

The Spano save

That led Siano to press him about grand jury testimony a decade ago, regarding Mangone's efforts to fix the write-in Green Party primary for Spano by using absentee ballots.

"You lied to those grand jurors in order to protect your political patron, Nick Spano?" Siano asked.

"Yes," replied Mangone, who also agreed he'd falsely said that Spano didn't know about his efforts.

Mangone testified in the trial of Dennis Wedra, whom Siano called a "political mercenary," pursuant to a cooperation agreement with Westchester County District Attorney's office, led by Jeanine Pirro, whose (now separated) husband Al Pirro, a local powerbroker and admitted felon, later worked as a lobbyist for Forest City Ratner.

Mangone signed a cooperation agreement, agreeing to plead guilty to a misdemeanor in exchange for his testimony. But he was never charged by the grand jury--and admitted to lying to it, despite an agreement to testify truthfully before the trial jury.

But Mangone lied to that trial jury. "You did it because you were protecting your political benefactor, Nick Spano," Siano asked.

"Yes," Mangone said, admitting that he had perjured himself.

Wedra, Siano related, had asked for $50,000, but Mangone and Spano persuaded him to work for $15,000, and agreed on a scheme to pay him not from Spano's Senate campaign committee but a committee led by Spano's sister.

But Mangone, not the sister, had signed but blank checks, and wrote them not to Wedra, but to a political action funds. "You told the jury it would hide the flow of money from the public and press," Siano related.

Mangone agreed.

Mangone, as noted by the Journal News, "stayed on Spano’s staff for several more years after that and also got a job soon after the trial at a law firm with ties to Spano." The latter, queried last night by the newspaper, would not comment.

A law firm and a state Senator

Mangone joined a firm known at one point as Santangelo, Servino and Mangone and at times under other names.

"The firm had a contract to provide services for a particular county," Siano related, "and your partners agreed to pay the person responsible for the contract cash payments. On at least one occasional, you made a cash payoff."

Mangone agreed.

"The state Senator who caused the contract, he asked you and your partners to place an individual on your staff?" Siano asked. [The name was not specified, but it may have been Spano ally Vincent Leibell, who has since pleaded guilty to corruption charges.]

Mangone said no, it was another state senator.

The state Senator promised "he'd get you so much work you'd have to build a wing" on your office, Siano related.

The new hire was Matt Libous, son of state Senator Tom Libous, who, according to testimony, got the law firm to raise his son's salary from $50,000 to $100,000. But when the Senator asked the partners to raise the salary to $150,000, they balked.

[I'm checking with Libous's office for comment.]

Mangone, related Siano, had told the FBI that the partners had become very dissatisfied with Matt Libous, because he missed court appearances.

Libous was assigned to the Milio Management account. "Did you tell the Milios that the reason Matt Libous was on staff was [because of] a payoff?"

"No," Mangone replied.

"He was let go because no one delivered on the promise of new business?" Siano asked.

Yes, replied Mangone, adding that "we couldn't afford him."

Doing business in cash, and gambling some away

Siano got Mangone to agree that the law firm sometimes received payments in cash, but did not log them in accounts receivable.

The firm also maintained "attorney trust accounts," purportedly protecting clients' money, though Mangone agreed he'd used money from those accounts to cover markers at several casinos.

Mangone, who admitted to "a substantial gambling habit between 2004 and 2008," agreed he'd visited some 27 casinos in 2006. And though he had a credit limit at some ranging up to $20,000, he was banned from some casinos.

In 2007 and 2008, at just two Atlantic City casinos, Mangone had compiled gambling debts of about $149,000.

Siano, challenging Mangone with a 2004 credit application the latter had made to a casino, asked Mangone if he had reported a total gross income of $265,000--apparently the figure in the casino document--on his federal income tax return.

"I don't recall," Mangone replied.

Trial resumes Monday

The trial resumes Monday, with Mangone still facing cross-examination from Siano, who has not yet gotten to the Longfellow project.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.