Skip to main content

Barclays Center completion date pushed back a week, but arena "is slightly ahead of schedule." How so? They changed the schedule to erase delays.

Delays are taking their toll on Barclays Center construction, pointing to a hectic--and perhaps nerve-wracking--pace to the finish line.

Not only is the Carlton Avenue Bridge delayed, the substantial completion date for the arena has been nudged back one week for the second time in five weeks, to 9/5/12. That gives arena operators little more than three weeks to test building systems before the first event, a 9/28/12 concert with superstar Jay-Z.

Also, after a report in January indicated that the Barclays Center was behind schedule, a new report from the same construction monitor asserts that the arena is "slightly ahead of schedule," based on actual cash flow versus projected cash flow.

(The final completion date is 6/30/13, which indicates additional work will have to be done while the building is operating.)

Presto: the arena's ahead

Top chart from Feb. 2012
bottom from Jan. 2012
That happy conclusion, however depends on changing the schedule, a slight-of-pen unacknowledged in the latest Site Observation Report by Merritt & Harris, the real estate consultant to the arena PILOT Bond Trustee. (Dated 2/6/12, it's based on a visit of 12/22/11 and a documents review.)

Merritt & Harris chronicles construction progress via charts, like the ones at right. (Click on all graphics to enlarge.) The solid circles represent projected cash flow, while the hollow circles indicate actual money spent.

The top chart at right, taken from the February report, suggests that actual spending handily outpaces projected spending.

However, the chart accompanying the January report, in bottom at right, points to a convergence of the two trend lines. As I wrote 1/5/12, the data  indicated that the arena had been slightly behind for three months.

Changing the schedule

How to get around that problem? Change the schedule.

Top chart from Jan. 2012
bottom from Feb. 2012
By stretching out the timetable to meet the hard cost spending total of $485 million-plus, current spending can be portrayed as outpacing the projected spending.

Take a look at the graphic at left. In the top half, from the January 2012 Merritt & Harris report, as of the June 2013 final completion date, there would be $485,012,000 spent, or 100% percent of the total.

In the bottom half of the graphic, from the February 2012 report,as of the June 2013 final completion date, there would be $479,818,000 spent, or 98.88% of the total. Each previous month has a target completion percentage lower than in previous reports.

There's no indication of when 100% would be spent.

The bottom line

In the last three reports, Merritt & Harris has moved back the substantial completion date for the arena from 8/23/12 to 8/30/12 to 9/5/12.

(In last month's report, the firm, also moved back the completion date for site work around the arena to 9/25/12 from 8/29/12, but this month moves it up to 9/5/12.)

The overall construction schedule points to challenges in meeting the June 2013 final completion date. While that may set up snags in coordinating construction efforts with arena activities, the more lesson is this: these documents are tough to trust, as significant changes are presented with no acknowledgement or explanation.

Transit connection delayed

As noted in the screenshot at right, according to the Construction Progress Chart (below), based on cash flow, "the Arena is slightly ahead of schedule, while the Transit Connection is approximately 2 months behind schedule."

However, because there's some slack in the schedule--the Transit Connection isn't supposed to open until the arena does--the "additional 2 months will have no impact on the overall project schedule"

A new schedule to be issued this month is supposed to include all delays and establish the final completion date.

In the screenshots below, I've highlighted some figures on the chart, notably the percentage difference between actual and projected cash flows--percentages that have changed as the schedule was attenuated--as well as the percentage completion expected in the last few months of the project.

February 2012 report

January 2012 report

December 2011 report

November 2011 report

The transit connection

The report states that "due to early delays" the Construction Schedule slipped by approximately 2 months." 

That simply doesn't compute. The early delays had no significant impact, because the transit  connection was well ahead of schedule for many months. 

The project began, as the graphic below indicates, in August 2010, and didn't start to lose ground until July 2011.

When is substantial completion for the arena?

In April 2001, the substantial completion date was nudged back two weeks from 8/12/12 to 8/27/12, but in October 2011 was nudged forward to 8/23/12. That number stuck through December 2011.

As noted, in the past two reports the date has slipped by a week each month.

December 2011 report

Note the substantial completion date of 8/23/12 for the arena and 8/29/12 for the site work.

January 2012 report

Note the substantial completion date of 8/30/12 for the arena, a weeklong delay, and 9/25/12, nearly a monthlong delay, for the site work.

February 2012 report 

Note the substantial completion date of 9/5/12 for the arena, while that is now the date for the  site work, as well.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…