Skip to main content

At panel on stalled megaprojects, AY draws implicit skepticism and indirect support (but only if there were infrastructure investment)

So, is Atlantic Yards the right kind of megaproject? AY came up only glancingly during a panel on Saturday during the Institute for Urban Design's conference Arrested Development: Do Megaprojects Have a Future?, but panelists' comments, in general, offered much implicit skepticism--though some indirect support--for Brooklyn's most controversial project.

Notably, they portrayed megaprojects as mainly (but not exclusively) public infrastructure projects, such as transportation, not sports facilities.

And while one panelist, former developer Vishaan Chakrabarti, made a case for "extreme density" as a way to save energy in a steadily urbanizing world, he said such projects had to include "very intense" infrastructure investments in mass transit, parks, and schools.

Atlantic Yards, while it's supposed to include an upgraded Long Island Rail Road yard, would have no subway improvements other than a new entrance. There'd be space for a school but the new open space would be long-delayed--as opposed to beforehand, as with Battery Park City--and mostly serve the new residents rather than "Brooklyn," as developer Forest City Ratner has promised.

(I didn't attend the panel but listened to a recording.)

Stringer: need for balance

In the keynote address for the panel "Megaprojects in the Metropolis," held at Cooper Union, Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer tried to strike a balance. "The city has to change and has to grow," he said. "It always struck me how City Hall or megadevelopers will come into a community and they will say, Well, this is what we're going to build, this is how tall we're going to build is and we'll give you some crumbs for the community along the way. When I became Borough President, I realized the only way to build our projects with and preserve our communities is to get more community stakeholders at the table. And that's why we spent so much time building our Community Board reform effort, to bring people into the planning process. See, I do believe that development is essential for our city. But I also believe that community-based planning, and the city and the developers working together, is actually the way this city will stay vibrant and will stay competitive."

Of course, with Atlantic Yards, community boards were bypassed completely because it's a state project, and the criticism and opposition posed by the three affected CBs was essentially ignored.

Stringer, notably among borough presidents, has made an effort to strengthen community boards, but the balance isn't easy--he portrayed the Columbia University expansion and a Harlem rezoning as a win-win, though a good number of people in the neighborhood might disagree.

Legacy issues

"Part of what I think has happened over the last ten years is elected officials who are responsible for planning figured out they were more interested in leaving their legacy intact than figuring out how to build these large projects," Stringer said.

While Stringer was referring to transportation projects like the Second Avenue subway and Moynihan station, his "legacy" comment recalled Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz's public disavowal--at least for now--of any legacy.

Prioritizing projects

Stringer suggested a need to prioritize. "We can't do every single big project," he said. "There's just not enough money, and we are in a recession. What we can do is prioritize, and go from ten megaprojects to three or four, and order them in priority, what will jump-start the economy… create jobs."

Note that Atlantic Yards, which would of course create short-term construction jobs, would not create jobs at the level of office development or new transportation infrastructure.

"Second, there has got to be an understanding that a lot of projects are not just city-centric, but regional," Stringer said, noting the connection to New Jersey and Albany. While he referred to the Port Authority, which has bistate responsibility, it should be remembered that, from a regional perspective, the tri-state area doesn't need another arena, given the presence of an under-utilized arena in Newark. But one of the reasons New York City officials supported the Brooklyn arena was the opportunity to poach tax revenues from New Jersey.

Still, as was discussed later during the panel, it's very hard to follow the Canadian model, where cities and regions work much better as planning units.

Stringer, in his closing remarks, suggested that a balance was possible. "When you listen to neighborhoods, we do come up with the best projects," he said. "The stadium project in the past, on the West Side railyards, was a mistake and people knew it, so it didn't happen. The High Line was not a mistake and people knew it would create tourism, people knew it would create millions of dollars to local businesses…we don't have the stadium, but we have the High Line. That's urban planning at its best."

No one else on the panel was quite so optimistic.

Who pays?

Susan Fainstein, Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, reminded the audience that financing, not planning, drives a project. First a developer thinks profit is possible, the developer goes to lenders, then partners with the public sector. "So money drives development, not the other way around."

She asked rhetorically whether "bold vision" (a developer's phrase) is what we need, as opposed to a more incremental approach. And she noted that's hard to have citizen participation in certain megaprojects, such as on the outskirts of Amsterdam and London, where there's public apathy because nobody's directly in the path of the plan.

(Brooklyn, as we know, is a bit more contentious.)

"Extreme density"

Chakrabarti, Marc Holliday Professor of Real Estate Development; Director, Real Estate Development Program, Graduate School of Architecture, Planning & Preservation, Columbia University, reflected frequently on his work for the Related Companies on the Hudson Yards plan.

He said the question was what kind of transformation we seek. "I would argue that high density, even extreme density, is the right thing to do when it's coupled with very intense infrastructure development: mass transit, parks, schools." That, he said, "will give us a leaner, greener, meaner economy. I'd argue that that is exactly what we are not doing today. And we're doing it in a competitive world where we may very well suffer the consequences of not doing it."

His example: there are 12 flights a day from Newark to Philadelphia, which is completely unnecessary.

Chakrabarti pointed out that Shanghai in the 1990s built 900 million square feet of space, while all of Midtown Manhattan is 250 million sf and Lower Manhattan 92 million sf. Meanwhile, while the country needs $150 billion in high-speed rail investment, there was only $8 billion in the federal stimulus package for high speed rail. And China is spending $585 billion on infrastructure, with lots of high-speed rail.

The question, he said, is whether our megaprojects are going to be tall or sprawl. "I would argue that West Side of Manhattan should be extraordinarily dense, but you have to have infrastructure to support that density."

New York City, he said, uses one-third the energy per capita of the rest of country, thanks to mass transit and party wall construction.

While he said he's not against green buildings, driving two hours in a car to get to a "green" house is counterproductive.

He said Moynihan Station should be already be under construction. "Instead, we've completed three-and-a-half environmental impact statements. I think we've reached a sense of paralysis in this country about how we allocate public resources."

What kind of megaprojects?

Jeff Madrick, Senior Fellow, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis, The New School, and author of The Case for Big Government, gave a historical analysis, looking back at the Erie Canal, railroads, sanitation and sewer systems, roadbuilding.

He suggested that the public's relationship with government changed drastically in the 1970s, as distrust began, and then grew further under the presidency of Ronald Reagan. So "we became, when it came to government, a pessimistic nation," with a lack of a belief in planning, taxes, and public investment.

Public sector investment

During the discussion period, Chakrabarti returned to the density issue, with a reference to Atlantic Yards.

"If you took the kind of density you see around Grand Central, if you took the density proposed at Hudson Yards, and spread that out into the region, the carbon footprint of that would be unconscionable," he said. "How to structure the public-private benefits [is] absolutely the critical question."

"I think if you ask Forest City Ratner, if you ask Related, would they love to see the public invest in actually building the platforms, and actually split up development obligation, I think they would absolutely sit down at the table and discuss that," he said. "The problem is the public first cannot afford a billion and a half dollar platform over the West Side Yards, so the question is how do you structure something that will actually make that density happen. The density should happen where a lot of transportation infrastructure exists."

Well, yes and no. The platform over the Vanderbilt Yard in Brooklyn would be under a hundred million dollars, at least according to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's appraisal (though not Forest City Ratner's initial bid), and there's $305 million in direct subsidy already. And if the MTA had built the platform and put the site out to bid Forest City Ratner would've faced a lot more competition.

World cities

Can New York City compete with growing global cities like Singapore, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Dubai?

Chakrabarti said things would change when gasoline prices go up, noting that, when they did recently, mass transit use increased.

Fainstein pointed out those examples were not robust democracies. Chakrabarti responded that there was similar investment in Bombay.

Fainstain said it would be hard to eliminate the local voice, given a commitment to home rule.

Chakrabarti was more optimistic, citing the "remarkably sophisticated" Community Board 4 in Manhattan that approved the rezoning for Hudson Yards. "In that case, they really wanted promises that the subway line would be built, that parks would be built," he said. "It's a quid pro quo."

The open space promised "for Brooklyn" in the Atlantic Yards project would not come for years and would mainly serve the new residents.

Socializing risk

One questioner, pointing to developer Larry Silverstein's negotiations at Ground Zero, asked if developers attempt to privatize profit and socialize risk. Fainstein agreed, pointing to the Times Square development, where huge subsidies were justified because nobody would pay market rent. Now, she said, they do get market rent, "but we are not getting subsidy back."

When it comes to public-private partnerships, "the public sector could bargain a whole lot better than it actually has," she said.

That comment, I'd suggest, could be just as easily be applied to Atlantic Yards.

Chakrabarti closed by pointing out that New York City every year gives $18 billion more in taxes to the state and federal governments than it receives, so, if tax revenues were returned, the city's major infrastructure projects should be built.

"I don't think the public should ever pay for or finance development that the private sector wouldn't," he said. "At the same time, I think it's important to understand that Midtown and Lower Manhattan support every public good in the city. We have a better affordable housing track record than the entire state of California. We have some of the most extraordinary parks in the world, some of the most extraordinary waterfront, that's all supported by the two engines of Lower Manhattan and Midtown. And that again plays to the point of urbanization and infrastructure."

In other words, he was talking much more about office space than housing. And we know what's happened to AY office space. Was there ever even a market for it? I wrote in January 2006 that office space was overpromised from the start.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.