Skip to main content

Did FCR tell government it stopped work at the Vanderbilt Yard? Barely. And why was that train trestle stalled?

So, what did Forest City Ratner tell government agencies when it decided in early December to stop work at the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) Vanderbilt Yard.

Not much.

After filing Freedom of Information Law requests with both the MTA and the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), the only evidence of communication was a phone call, documented in an email report from ESDC ombudsman Forrest Taylor, in which an FCR representative told him they had "completed the work needed thus far." (Click on graphics to enlarge.)

Notably, the documents also point to a stalled construction of a train trestle, with no explanation of how much had been completed nor of when it might be completed.

When queried how far along the trestle might be, ESDC spokesman Warner Johnston responded, "With regards to how much has been completed, FCRC would know." But Forest City Ratner hasn't been doing much information-sharing lately, as DDDB reminds us.

What's missing

No documents provided to me refer to the impact of lawsuits, which was the ESDC's initial public explanation for the work stoppage.

The documents also refer to a temporary train trestle bridge in the middle of Block 1121, bounded by Atlantic Avenue and Pacific Street and Carlton and Vanderbilt Avenues.

Johnston explained, "It will eventually extend the entire length of Block 1121 to connect the East Portal entrance of Block 1121 to Block 1120." As the photos taken Monday by Tracy Collins show, the trestle seems to be in very preliminary stages, so it's certainly questionable that FCR had "completed the work needed thus far."

The MTA's response was brief: it has no records responsive to my request. So either Forest City Ratner didn't say anything, or whatever communication that occurred was so casual as not to be documented.

Clues from field inspections

Interestingly enough, the ESDC also supplied me with copies of several Atlantic Yards Field Inspection Reports, conducted by Henningson, Durham & Richardson Architecture and Engineering, P.C. (HDR), the agency's environmental monitor.

Those reports suggest that Forest City Ratner had nearly completed some phases of work at the railyard, but also leave enough gaps that support the speculation the developer simply ran out of money and cut off all work.

Note that the reports are based on inspections of ongoing work, not an analysis of the potential work plan. In other words, Forest City Ratner could, for example, tear down the Spalding Building it owns, but has chosen not to do so, instead using the building for offices and (I've heard) to house some workers. After all, should the Atlantic Yards plan fail, the units in the renovated building could easily be re-sold.

Railyard work trails off

An 11/26/08 memo from HDR to ESDC indicates that the only work at the railyard was construction of the train trestle, progressing west to east.

An 12/4/08 report, written a day after I reported that work had stopped at the Vanderbilt Yard, states:
On Thursday December 4th, I met with Staci Zegler to discuss upcoming activities taking place in the railyard. Staci informed me that excavation work is 95% complete and the drilling of all SOE [Support of Excavation] and foundation piles has been completed as well. The only work taking place in the railyard at this time is the construction of the train trestle is continuing, progressing west to east.

The report, under the heading Soil Remediation, also states:
During my discussions with Staci, she informed me that we should expect to receive a DVD of all final soil manifests in mid-December.

A week later

A 12/12/08 report states:
There was no work occurring in the railyard at the time of this site visit.

That begs some questions: Had the final 5% of excavation work been completed? Had the train trestle been constructed?

The report also explains that the developer plans to inject RegenOx, which destroys contaminants, into two railyard lots and must alert the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It states:
HDR will request from FCRC a copy of the EPA notification.

11 days later

A 12/23/08 report again states there was no work occurring in the railyard. And it references some lingering issues:
a. HDR has requested from FCRC a copy of the EPA notification. FCRC has yet to respond.
b. HDR has followed up with FCRC to determine if the injection will be performed via wells, and, if so, confirm that FCRC will properly close the wells and inform the EPA of when and where the wells are closed. HDR is currently waiting for a response from FCRC.

(Emphases added)

Three weeks later

A 1/13/09 report repeats the text directly above, indicating that HDR still awaits a copy of the EPA notification and a response regarding the use of wells.

Also, even though the DVD regarding soil manifests was expected in mid-December, it had not arrived.

Who's in charge?

It's unclear what this all means. Is the failure to respond promptly to HDR a sign of a temporary problem or a more long-lasting one? Could an injection of cash easily restart the developer's work? Why doesn't the ESDC know how much of the trestle has been completed, and why?

While it's not implausible that the work could restart, should there be victories in court by the state and increased cash flow for the developer, the confusion about the trestle and the failure to follow through on announced communications (the DVD) or to respond to requests from HDR raise a question: is the developer in charge, or the state?

Those would be good questions for an oversight hearing on Atlantic Yards.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.