Skip to main content

Why Frank Gehry is Brett Yormark's problem (and other FAQs)

The murky news that Atlantic Yards architect Frank Gehry's role has receded, and that an arena would be designed with cost-cutting in mind from its previous $950 million price tag, raises several questions, most of which can be answered only with circumstantial or incomplete evidence.

But that evidence, so far, hints at even more trouble for the project, at least if developer Forest City Ratner can't use Gehry to sell suites and sponsorships.

So, what happened with Gehry?

According to two news reports, though without named sources, Gehry laid off his staffers working on Atlantic Yards. (One commenter asserted the staffers were merely shifted.) One report said it was because he hadn't been paid.

Is Gehry off the project?

According to Forest City Ratner, no.

Is he on the project?

It depends on what we mean by "on." Gehry may still be providing guidance on his designs, but the arena may be out of his hands by now. Forest City Ratner won't specify what his role is.

Is Gehry's relationship with Forest City Ratner strained?

Possibly. He's been more cooperative in the past; last May, when the flagship office tower was redesigned, Gehry dutifully declared:
The design for Miss Brooklyn, which we now call Building One, has become very special for me.

Gehry hasn't said anything similar, defending his current role. When it was reported that landscape architect Laurie Olin was off the project, both Olin and the developer said he was on sabbatical but the relationship was fine.

Then, why hasn't Gehry complained about his (apparent) diminished role?

Unclear. Maybe he's waiting to get paid. Maybe he's expecting to have more of a role. Maybe a contract clause keeps him from speaking out. He said three years ago, "I think if it got out of whack with my own principles, I would walk away."

What's wrong with value engineering to reduce costs?

Nothing. Gehry recognized the issue three years ago. But it may be a little late in the process now. And it may change the design of the arena significantly.

Would it still be a Frank Gehry arena?

Well, surely his name would be on it. The Wall Street Journal reported that "Gehry has overseen the design of nearly every element of the planned Brooklyn arena." So maybe it depends on what changes are made.

How much cost-cutting at the arena is possible?

Unclear. Maybe not so much.

Why is Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz weighing in on arena architecture, saying Forest City Ratner should pursue economies?

Well, likely to provide some political cover for changes the developer wants to make. Design is not exactly the BP's responsibility. And he has previously hailed Gehry's role.

What did Markowitz mean when he said Brooklyn-style stoops might be incorporated in Atlantic Yards towers?

Unless he was misquoted, the only thing he meant is that he really doesn't understand architecture. (Graphic from DDDB.)

Is the cost of the arena an issue to the government?

Not as much as it is to the developer. However, as I contended, there's no way the land underneath the arena could be valued high enough for the foregone taxes to be sufficient to match the PILOTs, or payments in lieu of taxes, needed to pay off a $950 million arena. So public officials might have nudged FCR for a less costly arena, as well.

Is the architecture the Empire State Development Corporation's (ESDC) problem?

Well, ESDC spokesman Warner Johnston said, "The aesthetic choices are Forest City Ratner's."

Really? Aren't there Design Guidelines?

Yes. According to page 6 of the ESDC's Modified General Project Plan:
Each element would be designed pursuant to the comprehensive design and open space guidelines developed by ESDC in consultation with the City and attached hereto as Exhibit B (collectively, as the same may be amended in accordance with the terms thereof, the "Design Guidelines"), which Design Guidelines are being approved in connection with this General Project Plan.

Didn't Gehry's office prepare those Design Guidelines?

Yup.

What do the Design Guidelines say, for example, about the arena?

Here's part of it:
The street walls of the Arena shall include glass elements having a minimum width of 100 feet and a minimum surface area of 5,000 square feet on each of the Atlantic Avenue and the Flatbush Avenue street walls.

... The Arena fa├žade shall include transparent elements in the Atlantic Avenue and Flatbush Avenue street walls allowing for views into the arena concourse from the adjoining sidewalks.


But isn't Markowitz saying there should be less glass?

Yes. Those Design Guidelines can apparently be amended.

Is there another reason for getting rid of glass?

I think it would remove a security risk evinced at the Prudential Center in Newark.

If Gehry is gone or his role diminished, shouldn't Forest City Ratner be worried?

Well, Gehry was a selling point for a B1 anchor office tenant, for the market-rate housing, and for the arena.

Why is this a problem for New Jersey Nets CEO Brett Yormark?

Well, presumably when Barclays Capital bought arena naming rights, they wanted their name attached to a building designed by the world's most famous architect. Ditto for the sponsors who've already signed on. Those who've bought luxury suites, designed by Gehry, presumably factored Gehry's role into the cost. The unsold suites should be tougher to sell, and it should be harder to attract additional sponsors. And, depending on how things unfold, some who've already signed on may look for an escape clause.

Are elected officials more wary of Atlantic Yards?

It seems so. Mayor Mike Bloomberg yesterday, in his State of the City Address, cited Coney Island, Willets Point, and Hunters Point South as important projects. Atlantic Yards he ignored.

What may be bigger news this week?


The hint that Forest City Ratner may be trying to chintz the MTA out of an upgraded railyard.

Comments

  1. nothing new here.

    mighty developer promises an island in the sky.

    said developer waives hands at possibilities while convincing city to bow down with free gold.

    city unable/unwilling to produce MORE free gold.

    mighty developer not so mighty. actually not so much a developer as a broker of other peoples money.

    developer slips into the night leaving devastation upon the city.

    lather. rinse. repeat.

    brooklyn...(and marty)

    punked. again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "The unsold suites should be tougher to sell, and it should be harder to attract additional sponsors. And, depending on how things unfold, some who've already signed on may look for an escape clause."

    Someone should ask Yormark again about how many suites the Nets have "sold" at the "Barclays Center." I'd bet that if you subtract "sales" to affiliated entities (FCR, Barclays, Jay-Z, etc.), and the Bloomberg Administration's free suite, the real number is close to zero. Of course, we can be sure that Yormark won't be able to provide receipts for all his claimed "sales."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.