Skip to main content

In Fresno, new mayor wary of lingering FCE project; developer's rep claims commitment

The new mayor of Fresno, CA, Ashley Swearingin, is wary of a delayed development called South Stadium, an 85-acre mixed-use project promised by Cleveland-based Forest City Enterprises.

KFSN reports:
She is not sold on developer driven investment like the agreement between Fresno and Forest City Enterprises.

"Frankly I'm not sure that the 85 acre exclusive negotiating agreement is the way to proceed, but we're taking a look at that right now," said Swearengin.


Exclusive agreements

At a debate in September, Swearingen, a Republican who led the Fresno Regional Jobs Initiative, said, "[L]et me speak in general terms and say that from a policy standpoint I never really supported or endorsed the idea of an exclusive negotiating agreement with Forest City. I think it’s the wrong way to go about downtown revitalization. Once it was done it was done and I was curious to see the outcome and I think thus far we just really haven’t seen anything, particularly when the Proposition 1C dollars were handed out and the Forest City project did not receive the funding that they expected to receive. So I think there are certainly red flags on that project."

Exclusive negotiating agreement? Doesn't she know that in New York, the president of the New York City Economic Development Corporation said of Atlantic Yards, "So, they came to us, we did not come to them. And it is not really up to us then to go out and try to find a better deal. I think that would discourage developers from coming to us, if every time they came to us we went out and tried to shop their idea to somebody else. So we are actively shopping, but not for another sports arena franchise for Brooklyn."

Swearingen's Downtown Revitalization Strategy states, "Unfortunately, our downtown has deteriorated beyond the repair of any one project, no matter how big or how small."

So she proposed multiple strategies. And the city's "biggest economic development challenge is really workforce development," says a strategy paper on Economic Development.

Local tensions

Fresno Bee columnist Bill McEwen wrote December 19 about some tension among city officials over the project, but said it was still more or less on track:
Moreover, Forest City remains committed to Fresno, even though it is being careful with its money and pulling back from taking on new projects, company senior vice president Susan Smartt told the City Council on Tuesday.

[Mayor Alan] Autry abandoned the Forest City bandwagon more than a year ago for two reasons: The firm never warmed to his idea of putting a water feature into the project, and it didn't turn dirt following the hype generated by the pursuit of Bass Pro.

But the City Council -- at least the one that listened to Smartt's report -- still sort of loves Forest City. On Tuesday, it wisely extended the firm's exclusive negotiating agreement for the South Stadium Project for another six months into mid-2009.

Forest City asked for a one-year extension. Outgoing City Council Member Brian Calhoun asked that his colleagues put the decision off until it could be made by the new council next year. Another outgoing council member, Jerry Duncan, proposed the six-month compromise, and it passed.

What does six months buy Forest City and Fresno taxpayers?

Time for Forest City to pursue state and federal money to close an estimated $100 million financing hole in the $300 million project.


That's a lot of government money.

Is FCE really committed?

Was Smartt blowing smoke about the developer's commitment?

Remember, FCE CEO Chuck Ratner said in a statement December 8 that the developer was cutting back:
1. Significantly slowing nearly all longer-term development. We remain committed to projects already under construction and to key, high-profile developments in core markets.

The Fresno project is not already under construction. It may be in one of FCE's core markets, which consist of Boston, New York City/Philadelphia, California, Washington, D.C./Baltimore, Denver, Chicago.

But is it a "key, high-profile development"?

Well, Chuck Ratner, in a conference call with investment analysts December 11, said that, while "virtually all new development [was] on hold... I need to emphasize here again that we remain committed to our projects under construction and we will meet our obligations and maintain our entitlements, including at our large multi-phase, mixed-use projects, such as Stapleton in Denver, Mesa del Sol in Albuquerque, Central Station in Chicago, the Yards and Waterfront Station in Washington, and of course, to Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn."

That doesn't sound like Fresno. The commitment may last only through last effort to gain sufficient subsidies.

Shifting project

According to the Fresno Bee, the city in 1998 advertised to get a developer to redevelop the area at issue. None would submit a bid. (That would not have happened with the MTA's Vanderbilt Yard in Brooklyn, which generated a bid even after Forest City Ratner was anointed by city and state leaders.)

Then the city began negotiating individually with developers. Fresno in 2004 agreed to work with Forest City Enterprises, which initially announced a plan to build two major retail outlets, smaller stores, and 600 homes.

But those major retailers didn't come through, so in August 2007, the developer switched gears, according to an 8/29/07 Bee article headlined Forest City plan OK'd, swapping those big stores for additional housing.

The first phase was supposed to take four years. There was no timeline for the second and third phases, involving a movie theater and commercial space.

Now there's no timeline for the first phase, either.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…