Skip to main content

P.C. Richard was low-balled $15 million for its half of Site 5. A huge two-tower project might go there.

We all know that, in New York eminent domain cases, the condemnor often low-balls owners of the subject property--whether residential or commercial--as a way to nudge them into negotiation. Of course they might get more money after a trial, but some are less willing to wait.

A case in point: the astounding offer of $15.1 million that Empire State Development (ESD), the state authority overseeing/shepherding Atlantic Yards, made in February to P.C. Richard, which owns one of the two buildings at Site 5, across Flatbush Avenue from the Barclays Center. (I found the letter looking through the court file; I've had no contact with the parties.)

That's well below the value of stated development rights, much less what is currently permitted (or might be permitted in the future) on the property.
Western flank of Site 5, where taller of two-tower project would be, at Atlantic and Fourth Avenues
Looking at the math

From Forest City to A.J. Richard
Consider. The site is 25,000 square feet, according to the 1997 deed of sale (at right) from Site 5/Atlantic Terminal Urban Renewal Area developer Forest City Ratner to P.C. Richard's parent, which did not state a sale price.

(Fun fact: the building was constructed by Dolly Williams of A. Williams Construction, who left the City Planning Commission in 2007 after paying a fine for conflicts of interest, as she was an investor in the Atlantic Yards project while voting regarding a small piece of what became the project site.)

By the way, Forest City got the land from New York City for all of $1.47 million, according to the document at below right.


According to current C6-2 zoning (see graphic at left)--which would be in place were ESD not overriding city zoning--it has a Floor Area Ratio of 6, meaning the bulk could be six times the base.

So that means 150,000 buildable square feet. At $15.1 million, that's just about $100 per buildable square foot.

But wait. Forest City Ratner late last year got $255 per square foot for nearby 625 Fulton Street, aka Ten MetroTech (which has an FAR of 10).

Even if the price per square foot might be lower--say $200, the estimated midpoint of the price Greenland paid Forest City for its share of Atlantic Yards--that suggests the $15.1 million payment should be, at minimum, doubled to $30 million.

If it were $255/sf, the value would be $38.25 million. It could even be higher, since most transactions recently in nearby Downtown Brooklyn have been around $300 per square foot.

That money would come from the Greenland Forest City Partners joint venture.

As far as I know, that's the formula--the value of the property were the project not being built.
From NYC to Forest City

Property worth far more

But the P.C. Richard property is now way more valuable, and just compensation--at least in a system in which landowners get a share of the future value--conceivably could be much higher.

First, a building of nearly 440,000 square feet is already approved for Site 5. The P.C. Richard site would occupy about half of that new building.

That suggests that it bears 220,000 square feet of development rights: $22 million, at $100/sf, or $44 million, at $200/sf. (Or $56.1 million at $255/sf.)

What's planned now

But wait. That's not what Greenland Forest City Partners is planning now. They're planning a giant 1.1 million square foot two-tower project (though it hasn't been approved), aiming to shift the approved bulk from the unbuilt B1, aka Miss Brooklyn, from the arena block across the street.

That suggests that the P.C. Richard site bears 550,000 square feet of development rights, or $55 million, at $100/sf, or $110 million, at $200/sf. (Or $140.25 million at $255/sf.) Those are big numbers.



Of course, these numbers are all estimates, based on certain assumptions.When two sides go to trial, the value proposed by the claimant's appraiser may be ten times that of the state's appraiser, as in this Atlantic Yards-related case.

Currently the condemnation is snagged for other reasons--a purported guarantee from Forest City for P.C. Richard to gain comparable space in the replacement building. That presumably will be resolved by a monetary payment, though the case, as noted in a document below, faces a compliance conference next May.

So too will the transfer of the property. I'd bet it's valued well above $15.1 million. But that still leaves a lot of room for argument.

Another city giveaway

According to one version of the Atlantic Terminal Urban Renewal Area (ATURA) plan, excerpted at right from the second document below,  New York City as of 1997 (at least) was reserving all development rights beyond that occupied by the low-rise big box store P.C. Richard.

(I haven't checked the regs regarding Modell's, which was a tenant on land still owned by Forest City, but I presume the situation is similar.)

I haven't yet checked to see if the ATURA plan was updated regarding this. However, as Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn discovered in August 2005, a second, secret Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed in February 2005 by Forest City Ratner, the city, and the state, allowing the developer to move 328,272 square feet in unused development rights from the Atlantic Center mall to Site 5.

In retrospect, it was a remarkable coup. It would be even more of a coup to shift the bulk of the B1 tower across Flatbush to Site 5 and pay little for the privilege.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

Click on graphic to enlarge. This is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change, and the project is already well behind that tentative timetable.


Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…