Skip to main content

Sam Schwartz's Street Smart: too smart for own good regarding Barclays transportation plan

There's much smart stuff in Sam Schwartz's new book, Street Smart: The Rise of Cities and the Fall of Cars.

Weaving memoir, policy analysis, and reportage with a light, Brooklynesque touch, Schwartz touches on the origins of "gridlock" (source of his "Gridlock Sam" nickname), congestion pricing, millennial preferences for urbanism, the prospects for driverless cars and Uber, and the success of cities like Zurich and Salt Lake City.

Livable streets advocates will embrace it, especially since the book regularly circles back to New York and Schwartz's battles in city government and experiences as a multi-modal transportation user.

But the book's epilogue and crowning story, an account of success in avoiding gridlock around the Barclays Center in Brooklyn--his firm Sam Schwartz Engineering was hired by arena operator Forest City Ratner--is too self-serving to go without correction.

In other words, sometimes Schwartz the consultant can trump Schwartz the honest broker. (After all, Schwartz's firm is still earning money from Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park.)

Tracing it back

To recap: many feared gridlock when the Brooklyn Nets arrived at the busy intersection of Atlantic and Flatbush avenues, especially because a very large arena, with 20,000 seats, was supposed to attract a good chunk of current New Jersey Nets fans.

Schwartz and others knew it was a "terrific" location for public transit, given the 11 adjacent or nearby subway lines and the Long Island Rail Road.

"The challenge was to change the behavior of a fan base that had been used to driving to Nets games," he writes. "Which was pretty much everyone, ever since the Nets had moved to New Jersey in 1977."

Except it wasn't, as Schwartz himself acknowledges in the very same paragraph: "We made a few assumptions. First, the team would be drawing fans largely from Brooklyn, Queens, and Long Island, since it stood to lose a fair bit of its ticket-buying base from New Jersey, and the Knicks remained Manhattan's favorite team."

That assumption, Schwartz fails to tell us, was wrong, though it certainly serves his narrative. (He also told Brooklyn Magazine, which did an interesting interview/profile, "This is where Walter O’Malley wanted to put the Brooklyn Dodgers." Not so.)

The results

According to Sam Schwartz Engineering's own report on the first year at Barclays, some 24.3% of weeknight Nets attendees return to Manhattan, while 7.4% go to Queens, 6.8% to Nassau, and 3.2% to Suffolk. Fewer than 10% returned to New Jersey, some 675 to 1000 people fewer than originally projected.

Some 36.4% attendees come from Manhattan, about 1 in 7 of them them Brooklynites; 36.9% return home to Brooklyn, while 31.6% arrive from the Barclays Center's borough.

Had Schwartz written that more than one-third of Nets attendees come from Brooklyn--with one-fourth of that cohort walking--that might have undermined the drama.

"We had to get the overwhelming majority of 18,000 basketball fans to leave their car keys at home and ride public transit," he writes. "A dozen focus groups, and 15,000 completed surveys later, we had confirmed who the fans were. And we had confirmed that a considerable proportion of them were nearly as car-dependent as any families in America."

(Note that "considerable proportion" is a bit fuzzy.)

Surveys showed that little--not free transit fares, free food, or discounts on team merchandise--changed minds. "Nothing except information," Schwartz writes. "More than 20 percent of the potential Nets fans who planned to drive to a game would switch if they knew which train to take there, when it left, and when it arrived."

That they did. And the arena has significantly promoted transit.

But if only some 20 percent switched, that means nearly 80 percent were not about to change their behavior. 

That begs other explanations. But Schwartz writes simply that the surveys left his firm confident enough to recommend that Forest City build only 541 on-site parking spaces, fewer than half that were allowed "for an arena with more than 18,000 seats."

The triumph, and the complexity

"By March of 2013, we knew that we hadn't hit our targets," he writes triumphantly. "We had exceeded them. Our goal was to have no more than 28.3% of fans arrive by private automobile for weekday games. Barely 25% actually do. In fact, so few people arrive by car that the on-site parking has never filled up... Getting that many people out of cars and into walking, biking, and taking transit is great for the environment and great for the community's mental and physical health."

That elides a lot. First, though the book claims that the arena has "more than 18,000 seats," for Nets games, the capacity is 17,700 (or 17,773) and the average attendance, given no-shows, 15,444.

The impact of those driving is lower for two additional reasons: the vehicle occupancy ratio is higher than projected, and fewer drive at peak hours. 

Also, far fewer people drive from New Jersey than projected, while many more attendees come from transit-friendly Brooklyn. Credit that not to Schwartz's innovation but to the New Jersey Nets' long and painful parting from their home state.

Missing perspective

Perhaps the biggest gap, in both the book and the report Schwartz publicly delivered in 2013, concerns parking. Schwartz in 2013 claimed that "Reduction of parking spaces" and "Lowered expectations for drivers" were key to reducing auto share.

Those deserve significant caveats. After all, the on-site parking lot--with an average of just 160 of 541 spaces filled for Nets games--wasn't empty because no one drove. It was empty because drivers didn't want to pay $35 for parking if could find free parking on the streets of Brooklyn. 

(Today's it's been plowed under for new construction and an eventual below-ground parking lot to serve both arenagoers and residents.)
"Most drivers prefer to pay for parking when they arrive at the facility," Schwartz stated in a 2013 presentation, citing other facilities beyond the dedicated arena parking lot. Rather, most drivers who pay for parking prefer to pay on arrival. Others prefer not to pay at all.

But Schwartz and other responsible parties ignored my request for backup data that would show that most were paying as opposed to cruising for free spaces.

(Remember, early in the Atlantic Yards process Schwartz told the 12/5/05 Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, according to the meeting notes, "From a consultant’s perspective, you must satisfy your client, but you must maintain your objectivity.")

I estimated that some 1447 cars arrived at Nets games. Putting aside those going to the arena lot of pre-paying for parking, that leaves more than 1,200 either to seek free parking or to buy it at the last moment.

The results is congested streets and frustration for those living in blocks near the arena, and a longstanding lament about the lack of residential parking permits. (Add to that a persistent problem with idling limos and black cars.)

In other words, yes, the Barclays Center has the lowest percentage of people coming by car, as Schwartz stressed to Brooklyn Magazine. But it should, because it backs into a residential area, and the state had to override city zoning that requires a cordon around such facilities.

The true cost of parking

Of course arena developer Forest City Ratner has not pushed for such residential parking permits, nor has Schwartz said anything about pricing or allocating what is now free parking.

Ironically enough, Gridlock Sam, the much-lauded planner behind the innovative Move NY congestion pricing plan, knows that free access to public goods can induce unwise civic behavior.

The availability of free street parking has surely helped the Barclays Center avoid a parking lot. But it's not very street smart.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …