Skip to main content

Pratt Center on 421-a renewal plans, which extend subsidies without affordability: A Luxury Housing Subsidy New Yorkers Can't Afford

According to a new issue brief (embedded below) by the Pratt Center for Community Development, the 421-a tax exemption to support new housing, cost New York City nearly $755 million last year in foregone taxes, or two-and-a-half times the level of property taxes forgiven under the program just five years earlier.

Now, the state legislature is poised to renew it, part of negotiations on rent regulation, the Pratt Center notes that it has produced only 5700 units of affordable housing over some 25 years.

What news outlets have picked up this news? Just City Limits, as far as I can tell.

The failure of reform legislation

Brooklyn readers should note the failure of reform legislation, announced just about the time that Atlantic Yards was first approved.

(Red dots show projects that have been completed and are currently receiving a 421-a abatement; black dots represent sites for future development that are exempt from the affordable housing obligation. Note several sites in Prospect Heights and in other neighborhoods reasonably close to the Atlantic Yards site.)

The report states:
Four years ago, the City Council and state legislature both sought to strengthen affordable housing production under 421-a by expanding the “exclusion zone”—so-called because projects in this area do not qualify for the as-of-right benefit but must instead contribute affordable housing in order to receive a tax break. The zone now includes areas in all five boroughs where developers must include affordable housing in tax-abated development projects, generally in neighborhoods where new market-rate housing is particularly expensive (see map). The administration also committed to placing $400 million into a new “421-a affordable housing fund” to be used for development in the city’s highest-poverty areas; combining Battery Park City revenues and city capital funds, it replaces an inefficient system under which affordable housing developers sold certificates to market-rate developers who claimed the abatement. The City capped benefits, so that owners of ultra-luxury apartments would no longer claim breaks worth tens of thousands of dollars annually. Finally, the revised law determined that all projects receiving benefits in the exclusion zone would have to provide their affordable housing on site.

“The changes have modernized the tax incentive to better target it towards the creation of housing for low- and middle-income families and will generate hundreds of millions of dollars for affordable housing,” the Bloomberg administration announced in the 2009 update of its New Housing Marketplace Plan. “The reforms are designed to create the maximum amount of affordable housing for the city while also ensuring that construction of new housing will continue at a strong pace.”

Unfortunately, projects built at the end of the boom were not covered by the expansion of the exclusion zone, and produced little or no affordable housing. In renewing the abatement in 2007, the state legislature determined that projects in the expanded exclusion zone had until June 30, 2008, to begin construction under the old law, under which they were granted the 421-a benefit as of right. This has enabled developers to build thousands of market-rate housing units in the expanded exclusion areas, and reap the tax benefit, without including affordable housing. These projects were also granted an exemption from a cap the City had sought to impose in an effort to rein in subsidies for ultra-luxury housing; the cap would have limited the exemption to about $9,000 per unit annually.

A Pratt Center analysis has found that in the two years leading up to that 2008 deadline, developers initiated construction on 271 residential sites eligible for 421-a, totaling more than 7,800 permitted units, in the new exclusion zone areas. Of those, 123 sites are now built and occupied, totaling 2,219 units of housing.... The remaining 148 sites are vacant, according to the Department of City Planning Pluto database 2010. Under the legislative measures introduced this year in Albany to renew 421-a, all will continue to remain eligible for 421-a benefits without an affordable housing obligation, under a new provision allowing for an “extended construction
period” of three years, in addition to the three years already allowed. Developers have established tax abatement eligibility for 5,642 units for these permitted sites, worth $30.9 million a year—again, with zero commitments for affordable housing production.
Pratt Center 421-a analysis, June 2011

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

Click on graphic to enlarge. This is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change, and the project is already well behind that tentative timetable.


Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…