Skip to main content

Doing the math on 550 Vanderbilt rents: out-of-whack for conventional investors

The top is done by now
It was inevitable, wasn't it, that apartments at the 278-unit condo building 550 Vanderbilt would be available for rent.

Surely some owners bought units as an investment. And perhaps developer Greenland Forest City Partners will rent out unsold units.

So now four units are for rent, via StreetEasy, for relatively affordable prices, not much above the rents at 461 Dean, which was built for rentals only and has 50% of the units below market.

That suggests the current glut in and around Downtown Brooklyn doesn't offer as much of a premium for a fully equipped condo building.

Also, perhaps, that apartments in a not-quite-finished building are harder to rent. Note that two of the units have no fee attached, which suggests the owners are willing to absorb the real estate agent's commission--again signs of a buyers' market.

Estimating the math

It also suggests, based on my calculations explained below, that the buyers renting out units may not be conventional investors. The expected revenue from renting, at least at current rent levels, would be insufficient to meet monthly mortgage payments plus common charges/taxes, assuming a 20% down payment.

Then again, the early buyers in such condos pay cash. Assuming quick lease-up and regular renewal, the units would deliver a reasonable but modest return to a cash purchaser.

But many people with nearly a million dollars in cash might find more reliable investments. So, beyond the conventional purchaser who just wants a place to live, who's buying it as an investment?

I can only speculate, but several types come to mind, all of which could overlap. First, some who are just bullish on Pacific Park and Prospect Heights, assuming their investment will rise over time. Second, those who value real estate as a tangible investment above alternatives.

Third, those who'd like to get their cash out of China (or another country) and care less about the return on investment than safety of capital, even with the strong dollar.

That's why Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings, which owns 70% of the joint venture, has an advantage in connections to potential buyers from China and their families/friends--for a project once billed as "helping solve Brooklyn's housing crisis."

A buyer from China?

So let's look at Unit 319, a 653-square-foot one-bedroom unit, purchased by Zhen Xi, whose address is listed solely as c/o Jun Wang & Associates, a law firm with addresses in Flushing, Midtown Manhattan, and Beijing.

Founder Jun Wang is described as "chief legal counsel of several reputable Chinese enterprises."

It's a reasonable--if hardly foolproof--bet that Zhen Xi is from China, and isn't planning to live in the unit immediately.

A $3,500 rental

Unit 319 is listed on StreetEasy at $3,500, the middle rent among the three one-bedroom units currently listed.

(Note that unit 422, advertised as a one-bedroom for a seeming bargain price of $3,200 and without any square footage listed, is actually a 541-square-foot studio--or "loft-style apartment," according to the ad--that the owner seems willing to convert into a one-bedroom by building a wall.)

The rent for unit 319 is competitive with one-bedroom apartments at 461 Dean, which now rent for as high as $3,240 and were listed as high as $3,424.

For unit 319, maintenance of $729.86 plus taxes of $26.90 total $756.76 monthly. So monthly revenues, given $3,500 in rent, become $2743.24, or $32,918.88 annually. (Without the 421-a tax abatement, monthly taxes would be $779.10!)

Given the purchase price of $878,620, a tick over the listed $875,000, that annual revenue means a 3.75% return on cash, putting aside additional transaction costs and repairs.

What if buyer financed it?

With the caveat that I'm no investment or tax advisor, let's look at the calculators StreetEasy supplies for those financing an investment.

If the buyer put down 20%, $175,724, the monthly payment, at a 4.4% interest rate (which was the rate that showed up automatically at StreetEasy) would be $4,277, or well above the monthly $3,500 rent.

(For owners who itemize deduction on U.S. income taxes, depending on their income, the mortgage savings make the deal more attractive. Then again, the owner is not necessarily earning much return on that 20% down payment, either.)


What about a lower rate? Again, if the buyer put down 20%, but at a 3.4% interest rate, the monthly payment would be $3,874, also above the monthly $3,500 rent--though again more advantageous for owners who itemize deduction.

And that low property tax payment--for 15 years--surely helps the bottom line, and thus fuels higher prices.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

So, Forest City has some property subject to the future Gowanus rezoning

Writing yesterday, MAP: Who Owns All the Property Along the Gowanus Canal, DNAinfo's Leslie Albrecht lays out the positioning of various real estate players along the Gowanus Canal, a Superfund site:
As the city considers whether to rezone Gowanus and, perhaps, morph the gritty low-rise industrial area into a hot new neighborhood of residential towers (albeit at a fraction of the height of Manhattan's supertall buildings), DNAinfo reviewed property records along the canal to find out who stands to benefit most from the changes.
Investors have poured at least $440 million into buying land on the polluted waterway and more than a third of the properties have changed hands in the past decade, according to an examination of records for the nearly 130 properties along the 1.8-mile canal. While the single largest landowner is developer Property Markets Group, other landowners include Kushner Companies, Alloy Development, Two Trees, and Forest City New York.

Forest City's plans unc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…