Skip to main content

"Reduced development exposure": why Forest City treats Greenland deal as an accomplishment

I'm late on this but it's worth a look.

A 4/7/16 proxy statement (anticipating a 5/25/16 annual meeting) from Forest City Realty Trust (formerly Forest City Enterprises), lists the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park joint venture with Greenland Holdings as an accomplishment for four of five Executive Officers, who in 2014 received about $1.6 million in bonuses for that deal.

That's because they "reduced development exposure"--on the hook for a smaller amount of future payments for projects--thanks to new partnerships and an increased focus in operating income.

This came after Forest City Enterprises finally at the beginning of the year became a dividend-paying REIT, or real estate investment trust, defined as "an entity that holds real estate and potentially pays no federal income tax due to a deduction for dividends paid." (REITs must pay out at least 90% of taxable income in dividends.)

Regarding CEO David LaRue:
  • Reduced development exposure while activating development pipeline with Greenland Atlantic Yards, LLC, a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Greenland Holdings Group Company Limited (“Greenland”), affiliated entities of QIC, one of the largest institutional investment managers in Australia (“QIC”), and Arizona State Retirement System (“ASRS”)
  • Established Strategic Capital and Operating Partnerships with ASRS/QIC/Greenland
CFO Robert O'Brien:
  • Established Strategic Capital and Operating Partnerships with ASRS/QIC/Greenland
Executive VP James A. Ratner:
  • Reduced development exposure while activating development pipeline with Greenland and QIC. Overall development ratio decreased.
Executive VP Ronald A. Ratner:
  • Reduced development exposure while activating development pipeline with Greenland and ASRS. Overall development ratio decreased.
What it means

So, what does this mean? Wasn't the Greenland deal a disappointment? Or was it something of a success, given that it locked in a short-term loss that could be written off, limited risk, and pointed to future revenues and profit?

LaRue in 2013 said, upon warning of a possible $250 million to $350 million impairment, or writedown of assets, "Clearly we are disappointed with this possible impairment as well. It spotlights two of the hard lessons we've learned coming out of the recession.We need to control land rather than own it, prior to being ready to go vertical, and we need a strong capital partner up front for a project of this magnitude."

But it wasn't quite that bad.  As I wrote in April 2015, Forest City's deal had a stated loss of $148.4 million after taxes. I wrote in May how Forest City harvested losses while a C Corporation, thus allowing tax efficiency.

Since then, the value of buildable land has continued to shoot up, raising the value of the market-rate housing, including condos and rentals, leading to much higher prices per square foot than once projected. Also, the city has agreed to fund subsidized housing at a higher price point than the developer originally promised, thus pointing to higher returns.

Then again, it's likely that Forest City's board lost patience with the long Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park buildout, and wanted to aim at less borrowing and lower risk. So the "reduced development exposure" means both less risk of loss but also less potential benefit--but now a better shot at benefit or, at least, cost recovery.

And it raises the question--as with the sale of the Nets--as to whether a company without quarterly earnings reports might have held on longer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.