Skip to main content

P.C. Richard was low-balled $15 million for its half of Site 5. A huge two-tower project might go there.

We all know that, in New York eminent domain cases, the condemnor often low-balls owners of the subject property--whether residential or commercial--as a way to nudge them into negotiation. Of course they might get more money after a trial, but some are less willing to wait.

A case in point: the astounding offer of $15.1 million that Empire State Development (ESD), the state authority overseeing/shepherding Atlantic Yards, made in February to P.C. Richard, which owns one of the two buildings at Site 5, across Flatbush Avenue from the Barclays Center. (I found the letter looking through the court file; I've had no contact with the parties.)

That's well below the value of stated development rights, much less what is currently permitted (or might be permitted in the future) on the property.
Western flank of Site 5, where taller of two-tower project would be, at Atlantic and Fourth Avenues
Looking at the math

From Forest City to A.J. Richard
Consider. The site is 25,000 square feet, according to the 1997 deed of sale (at right) from Site 5/Atlantic Terminal Urban Renewal Area developer Forest City Ratner to P.C. Richard's parent, which did not state a sale price.

(Fun fact: the building was constructed by Dolly Williams of A. Williams Construction, who left the City Planning Commission in 2007 after paying a fine for conflicts of interest, as she was an investor in the Atlantic Yards project while voting regarding a small piece of what became the project site.)

By the way, Forest City got the land from New York City for all of $1.47 million, according to the document at below right.


According to current C6-2 zoning (see graphic at left)--which would be in place were ESD not overriding city zoning--it has a Floor Area Ratio of 6, meaning the bulk could be six times the base.

So that means 150,000 buildable square feet. At $15.1 million, that's just about $100 per buildable square foot.

But wait. Forest City Ratner late last year got $255 per square foot for nearby 625 Fulton Street, aka Ten MetroTech (which has an FAR of 10).

Even if the price per square foot might be lower--say $200, the estimated midpoint of the price Greenland paid Forest City for its share of Atlantic Yards--that suggests the $15.1 million payment should be, at minimum, doubled to $30 million.

If it were $255/sf, the value would be $38.25 million. It could even be higher, since most transactions recently in nearby Downtown Brooklyn have been around $300 per square foot.

That money would come from the Greenland Forest City Partners joint venture.

As far as I know, that's the formula--the value of the property were the project not being built.
From NYC to Forest City

Property worth far more

But the P.C. Richard property is now way more valuable, and just compensation--at least in a system in which landowners get a share of the future value--conceivably could be much higher.

First, a building of nearly 440,000 square feet is already approved for Site 5. The P.C. Richard site would occupy about half of that new building.

That suggests that it bears 220,000 square feet of development rights: $22 million, at $100/sf, or $44 million, at $200/sf. (Or $56.1 million at $255/sf.)

What's planned now

But wait. That's not what Greenland Forest City Partners is planning now. They're planning a giant 1.1 million square foot two-tower project (though it hasn't been approved), aiming to shift the approved bulk from the unbuilt B1, aka Miss Brooklyn, from the arena block across the street.

That suggests that the P.C. Richard site bears 550,000 square feet of development rights, or $55 million, at $100/sf, or $110 million, at $200/sf. (Or $140.25 million at $255/sf.) Those are big numbers.



Of course, these numbers are all estimates, based on certain assumptions.When two sides go to trial, the value proposed by the claimant's appraiser may be ten times that of the state's appraiser, as in this Atlantic Yards-related case.

Currently the condemnation is snagged for other reasons--a purported guarantee from Forest City for P.C. Richard to gain comparable space in the replacement building. That presumably will be resolved by a monetary payment, though the case, as noted in a document below, faces a compliance conference next May.

So too will the transfer of the property. I'd bet it's valued well above $15.1 million. But that still leaves a lot of room for argument.

Another city giveaway

According to one version of the Atlantic Terminal Urban Renewal Area (ATURA) plan, excerpted at right from the second document below,  New York City as of 1997 (at least) was reserving all development rights beyond that occupied by the low-rise big box store P.C. Richard.

(I haven't checked the regs regarding Modell's, which was a tenant on land still owned by Forest City, but I presume the situation is similar.)

I haven't yet checked to see if the ATURA plan was updated regarding this. However, as Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn discovered in August 2005, a second, secret Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed in February 2005 by Forest City Ratner, the city, and the state, allowing the developer to move 328,272 square feet in unused development rights from the Atlantic Center mall to Site 5.

In retrospect, it was a remarkable coup. It would be even more of a coup to shift the bulk of the B1 tower across Flatbush to Site 5 and pay little for the privilege.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.