Skip to main content

Forest City's second Corporate Social Responsibility report maintains omissions about dicey issues; battle with Skanska shows hard-nosed tactics

So, what's a more accurate representation of Forest City Ratner/Forest City Enterprises: a carefully produced, selective report on corporate social responsibility, or a document unearthed in a lawsuit with its bitterly estranged former partner Skanska?

I'd bet the latter more accurately represents the hard-nosed business that drives shareholder value--though the report itself is a carefully crafted document.

The second edition of  Forest City Enterprises' Corporate Social Responsibility Report, issued in September, is, like the 2012 report issued in 2013 (bottom), a selective document, focusing on nice things like charitable contribution and energy efficiency measures.

It again ignores aspects of the Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines that touch on sensitive aspects of public-private partnerships, such as campaign contributions and negative community impacts.

Meanwhile, in a set of lawsuits involving Skanska, new details are emerging in the battle over cost overruns at the modular plant. Forest City and Skanska reciprocally blame each other, and neither party comes off well. (See this anonymous source saying both Forest Ratner and Skanska were willfully blind.)

Also, consider the email at right from Skanska EVP Mike McNally to colleagues, regarding a conversation he had last February with Forest City CEO MaryAnne Gilmartin and Executive VP Bob Sanna. McNally wrote:
"They basically said that we need to come to the meeting committed to alternative D (take the modules off the line regardless if they are ready) or don't show up. After about 10 minutes, I mentioned that we would also like to discuss the financial impact at the meeting and they went crazy. They were threatening and insulting."
This email was described but not detailed in an affidavit from Skanska's Richard Kennedy that I mentioned in September.

In another episode that has created bad blood between the companies, Forest City, which sued Kennedy individually, was--in a Skanska executive's words--"served by ambush" in his driveway at 8 pm in front of his small children, rather than having the process server deliver a copy of the lawsuit at his workplace.

This doesn't make Skanska a white knight, however; consider that the company had to pay nearly $20 million in 2011 for its role in a scheme in which fake minority contractors were used as fronts.

The new report


Forest City Enterprises this past September released "its 2013 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) report (below), which details the company's environmental, social and economic performance and governance strategy.

According to the press release:
Highlights include reporting water usage data for the first time, instituting an associate wellness program and reducing energy usage companywide by 5.7 percent. The company also recognized eight of its property teams through an internal awards program for achievements in sustained excellence and best practices in energy.
Click to enlarge
And similar omissions recur, as shown in the screenshot at left. There's no report of political contributions, nor displacement, nor mitigation measures taken in response to negative community impacts.

The new report does show some changes. It drops last year's misleading description of Atlantic Yards and, as one example of social responsibility, cites the late 2013 award to the Barclays Center from the Municipal Art Society as "Best Neighborhood Catalyst."

contended that the award was badly misguided, given the mixed impact of the arena, and the uncertainties of the then-pending Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement and railyard awaiting development.

How CSR report helps

These reports have a business purpose. As stated in the recent press release:
Forest City's first CSR report, issued last year and detailing achievements and metrics for 2012, helped drive improvement in Forest City's MSCI Intangible Value Assessment rating by two levels, from BB to A, in a single review period.
That MSCU Intangible Value Assessment goes beyond in traditional financial analyses to assess a company, and the increase of two levels was seen as a significant accomplishment for Forest City's overall image.

That assessment, too, has its flaws. As I wrote, Forest City's omissions went unmentioned in that Intangible Value Assessment. Nor were the deceptions in marketing EB-5 investments mentioned. Will the next Corporate Social Responsibility report mention how the 2014 EB-5 marketing got a rebuke from the U.S. State Department? I doubt it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.