Skip to main content

Does the basketball "fairy tale" in OKC have lessons for Brooklyn? Yes, but...

The Oklahoma City Thunder, a widely-admired basketball team, have as sketchy an origin story as any, but according to an article in the New York Times Magazine last Sunday, A Basketball Fairy Tale in Middle America, that back story doesn't matter much.

If so--and some online comments on the article contest it--that should be an encouraging sign for the Brooklyn Nets, who've already accomplished a mostly successful rebranding in a celebrated new arena.

Then again, the ongoing construction around and near the arena, as well as the differences between Brooklyn--surely not as monolithically hungering for a team--and OKC, may make it more difficult to craft that Brooklyn fairy tale. But I sure expect people to try.

The summary: no more "Zombie Sonics"

The key passage in Sam Anderson's essay is this:
Professional athletes, on the other hand, have rarely had much of a presence here. That began to change in 2006, when a consortium of wealthy Oklahomans, led by the financier Clay Bennett, bought the Seattle SuperSonics — a once-proud franchise that had been stuck for years in the drain-swirl of mediocrity. Most people assumed, cynically, that Bennett was buying the team in order to move it, as quickly as possible, to Oklahoma City, his hometown. He had pledged to make a good-faith effort to keep the team in Seattle — an effort that came into suspicion shortly after the sale, when the new owner demanded that Seattle come up with nearly $300 million to build a new arena. Seattle refused, at which point the ownership group announced, regretfully, that it was going to have to move the Sonics to a city with a suitable arena — a city that also happened to be Oklahoma City. The fallout was intense: lawsuits, protests, scandal. Even Oklahomans who love the team admit that they were uncomfortable with the way it was acquired. The sportswriter Bill Simmons, in solidarity with the people of Seattle, referred to the Thunder exclusively in his columns as the Zombie Sonics.
One of the miracles of the modern Thunder — and there are several — is how quickly they’ve made people forget the stain of their origin. The re-branding of the franchise has been quick and efficient: the team is now widely perceived as principled, well run and — above all — thoroughly Oklahoman. ESPN recently named it the No. 1 sports franchise in America. This fall, it seemed like a step toward closure when the Seattle City Council approved a plan to build a new basketball arena there. Simmons announced, just a few weeks ago, that he was officially retiring the phrase Zombie Sonics. In almost no time at all, the Oklahoma City Thunder had achieved escape velocity.
Note that the plan approved in Seattle, as noted by sports facility analyst Neil deMause, looks to be less demanding on public funds than Bennett's demands.

The backlash

In the comments, Oklahoma residents saluted Anderson for his sympathetic portrait of their city and state, while others were tougher. One, for example, cited the absence of gay rights there.

But the toughest comments came regarding the origin story. Wrote Charles Michener of Cleveland:
This fairy tale is just that—a glib, feel-good saga that's been too widely told for too long in the sports media. Sure, the making of the wonderful Thunder through the draft is a worthy model for other small-market teams in the NBA (and perhaps the only one available to them in this era of outsize rewards for a handful of superstars). But Sam Anderson's giddy account skates over the original sin of the Thunder's creation - Clay Bennett's perfidious theft of the team from the Sonics, abetted by the equally perfidious David Stern, not to mention the nasty streak in Bennett's right-wing, Koch brothers-style politics.
Added MKT of Portland, OR:
The article completely failed to mention Aubrey McLendon's malfeasance (both basketball-related and corporate) ... the documentary filn _Sonicsgate_  [link] is also illuminating and gives needed perspective on the story of the Sonics
Kristin of Boston, an Oklahoman, wrote:
For the most part you got it right, but a few things (from an east-coast oklahoman):
1. Part of the Thunder phenomenon in OKC can be attributed to how Oklahoma fans treat their teams in general. The saying goes that it is often faster to find your connecting flight to Oklahoma by looking for people in Sooners and Comboy (and more recently Thunder) gear than looking for the info board. Supporting these teams is essential to the 'okie' identity and wardrobe.

...4. As for the move from Seattle, it's clear to most that Bennett never intended to have them stay. Oklahoma City got a taste of a professional team while hosting the Hornets after Katrina. While Bennett was in the wrong, don't blame the team or the fans.
THUNDER UP!
By contrast, aarmom of Seattle wrote:
Fairy tale? Your storyis a fairy tale; the author loves basketball but he exhibits an amazing naivete and lack of curiosity in perpetuating this "fairy tale".
"The stain of their origin" may have been forgiven by Bill Simmons, but not by many knowledgeable basketball fans, including Charles Barkley, who took the Thunder to task for claiming Seattle's stats as their own, and not by Seattle basketball fans.
These wonderful and civic-minded owners are religious bigots: all Thunder games begin with a prayer, usually led by a preacher. They play in Chesapeake Arena - Aubrey McClendon, CEO of Chesapeake, gave $1 million in 20047 to the anti-gay marriage organization Americans United to Preserve Marriage; another Thunder owner gave $525,000 to the same organization.
I'm sorry Oklahoma City suffered a horrific tragedy, but this isn't a fairy tale - it's a story of greed and backroom deals between Clay Bennett and David Stern, assisted by an apathetic Howard Schultz.
Their transition and the outright lies committed by Bennett in order to steal the team from Seattle and transport it to OKC as part of a "citywide Renaissance" will always be an asterisk in whatever success they achieve.
C. Jama Adams of New York wondered:
The remarkable goodness of OKC's citizens would be a bit more believable, given their adoration of a young Black male, had the writer addressed, even briefly, issues such as race relations in OKC. How were the tax dollars and the perseverance used to build a more inclusive city?
...Supporting sports teams speaks to our need for communal events. It would be nice to have known if in OKC the pursuit of a sense of community and the ecstatic, went beyond the worshipping of Durant as a near God, the building of a secular temple (the stadium), and the wearing of the ordained garments. How does this get extended to other community and spiritual needs?
A debate

Jordan of Oklahoma wrote:
One thing I will say though is that Seattle had the chance to keep this team, and anyone who says otherwise is ignoring history. The people of Seattle passed Seattle Initiative 91 that rejected sports subsidies and ultimately doomed their chances at retaining the team. They wouldn't build a stadium, and Clay Bennett rightfully took it elsewhere. As an OKC resident, the bitterness I see from former Seattle fans is stunning. I can promise you one thing, if the people of OKC were asked to build a new stadium, it would pass in a landslide. Loyalty is a two-way street.
Stuart J of Seattle responded:
Mr Bennett had zero intention of keeping the team in Seattle. Mr Stern knows how to play the game: blackmailing a city to increase the amount taxpayers pay up so the team moves strikes fear into other cities, who are then forced to pony up in order to keep their team. Who wins? The league and the owners. Who loses? Fans and taxpayers.
And Seattle taxpayers are the ones who have forced the NBAs hand and proved what a fraud the league is, because the arena deal on the table now is much better than what Seattle would have gotten a few years ago, and is probably much better for taxpayers than an increase in sales tax, which according to Wikipedia is what taxpayers are paying for the Chesapeake / Ford arena.
Mused David of Toledo:
Why should the public pay for "sports subsidies" when the public is incapable of reducing the national debt, seeing that every American has health insurance, maintaining our infrastructure, providing jobs for all our wounded warriors, etc.?
Why can't billionaire sports team owners, who realize enormous windfall profits when they sell to the next owner, pay for their own stadia? (George W. Bush bought into the Texas Rangers for $600,000 and cashed out 9 years later for 14.9 million.)
Stuart J added:
The way the league blackmailed Seattle was no fairy tale. The way sports teams in general extort taxpayers is not a fairy tale. The Thunder was built on the backs of Seattle fans who had to endure a terrible last season as the now Oklahoma GM cleared cap space so that Mr Bennett and Mr McClendon would lose less money before they moved the team to OKC.
A word from the author

In Behind the Cover Story: Sam Anderson on the Civic Magic of the OKC Thunder, the Times Magazine blog asked the author a few questions:
You are a basketball obsessive. What drew your eye to this particular story?
The Thunder is a magical team. Everyone wanted to hate them after the debacle over whether the team would stay in Seattle, and many succeeded and even kept it up for a few years. But the team became so likable on so many levels (the personalities, the playing style, the organizational class, James Harden’s beard) that a lot of that hate just melted away. That’s not to say that many people in Seattle don’t hate them still, understandably. But the players are so young, they had all of this potential and then they actually realized it — which is such a rare thing in sports.

Your article has a sort of precapitalist fairy-tale quality. Is money the big bad wolf?
I think it is a sort of old-timey “golden era of sports” type of story. It kept reminding me of stories of the Brooklyn Dodgers of the 1940s and ’50s — how it was just this perfect fusion of community and team. But then of course the Dodgers got sucked off to the West Coast and Brooklyn went into a downward economic spiral that lasted something like 40 years — and that was all about money. The amazing thing about the Thunder is that the team’s origin story is definitely not a precapitalist fairy tale. Ask anyone in Seattle. But now the team has come to seem that way.
Anderson, by the way, wrote a 9/16/07 article for New York Magazine about Dodgers nostalgia and Atlantic Yards, Exorcising the Dodgers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…