Skip to main content

How many Nets fans from NJ will cross the river (and bring new tax revenues)? "You’re not going to have a lot of people from New Jersey following us," CEO Yormark acknowledged in 2009

Despite claims from fellow boosters of the Nets' move to Brooklyn, team CEO Brett Yormark, in a moment of candor, more than two years ago acknowledged that relatively few Nets fans from New Jersey would make the move to Brooklyn.

That won't necessarily affect the bottom line of the team and arena, since new fans from New York surely will buy seats and suites.

But it does diminish the argument for city and state arena subsidies, which were based in part on expectations of new tax benefits to the city and state from out-of-state visitors.

In other words, poaching a team may not be worth what it's cracked up to be.

How many current fans will go to Brooklyn?

Analysts of the team's move have assumed that about half of those attending Nets games at the team's previous home at the Meadowlands would attend games in Brooklyn, thus representing new activity in the local city economy.

However, the fuzziest piece of that cohort involves estimating how many current fans from New Jersey--as opposed to those from New York--would make the trip. And that estimate is suspect.

Sports economist Andrew Zimbalist, in his June 2005 report for Forest City Ratner, Estimated Fiscal Impact of the Atlantic Yards Project on the New York City and New York State Treasuries, asserted that 30 percent of New Jersey fans of the Nets will also attend games in Brooklyn.

In a 2/26/09 article, I explained why Zimbalist's figure was questionable. Among the reasons: arena attendance figures were likely overstated and the long goodbye may have soured a larger percentage of the fan base.
    The implication? More New York-based fans would be needed to fill the new Brooklyn arena, thus driving down local tax revenues.

    The evidence from suite sales

    On 11/4/11, the Bergen Record's John Brennan, in New Jersey left behind when Nets move to Brooklyn?, suggested that preliminary numbers from suite sales at the Barclays Center pointed to a lack of interest from New Jerseyans.

    Brennan recalled how Bruce Ratner, then the team's principal owner, said "he thought he could retain a good portion of the New Jersey Nets fans once they move to Brooklyn."

    However, only 36% of suite sales so far come from outside Brooklyn and Manhattan, including those from other boroughs, Connecticut, and Philadelphia, as well as New Jersey. No statistic for New Jersey alone has been announced.

    Now suite sales are not necessarily a complete proxy; after all, there are many more suites to begin with. The interim move to Newark surely has reconfigured the fan base somewhat, with a larger percentage of New Jersey fans living closer to New York City and more habituated to use public transit.

    And the Nets, Brennan noted, can always draw New Jersey fans on weekends, and recruit new fans in New York.

    So it's not their worry. But it should be on the minds of New York City and New York State officials.

    Yormark's pessimism about New Jersey

    In a 4/16/09 session at the Argyle Executive Forum, before the Atlantic Yards eminent domain case had been resolved and the Nets had announced an interim move to Newark, Yormark took a question about whether season ticket holders would be expected to follow the team.

    His response:
    I think the reality of the situation is you’re not going to have a lot of people from New Jersey following us just because even though it’s twelve miles from the IZOD Center, it’s a very challenging trip. I mean it could take you twenty minutes or two hours. But I do think those old time season ticket holders will buy partial plans. Maybe it’s a weekend plan because hopefully we’ve given them enough reason to follow us. Obviously the people in the five boroughs on this side of the river –I mean our trading area of influence is massive. I mean we have ten subway lines and the Long Island Railroad converging at the foot of our new building, the Barkley [sic] Center in Brooklyn. So we can market those season tickets to a lot of people.
    So hopefully that answers your question but we’re doing everything we can to get the folks from Jersey to follow us. If they do, great and if they don’t, that’s okay.
    Yormark didn't put a number on it, but I'd bet that "not... a lot" is somewhat less than 30 percent.

    What a booster says

    Yormark's remarks also contrast with one of the team's most unswerving fans, the pseudonymous Net Income (aka Robert Windrem), chief editor of Nets Daily, who wrote 5/14/11:
    A lot has been made in some circles about the Nets' move to Brooklyn being a dramatic shift, geographically, for the franchise, but the reality is different.  The team will cross two rivers, the Hudson and the East, the former a state boundary, but the move is similar to, and often a lot less dramatic than, a number of others made during the 28 years the Nets spent in the Meadowlands.
    His examples: moves made in the regions of Los Angeles, Cleveland. Detroit, and Baltimore/Washington. He has similarly made that contention in comments like this and this.

    Yormark, who presumably has access to better survey data, apparently disagrees.

    Somewhat similarly, another Nets official commented 1/8/12 on the travel distance between the interimthome in Newark and the new home in Brooklyn:
    “It’s about 10 or 15 miles, but it can take about an hour driving,” Nets general manager Billy King said.
    Now, public transportation would make it easier for New Jersey fans who, for example, work in Manhattan and would have a one-seat ride to Brooklyn. But it would be a two-seat ride home to New Jersey, via a bus or train, and thus less attractive.


    Popular posts from this blog

    Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

    Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

    Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

    The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

    While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
    if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

    Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

    The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

    The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

    The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

    According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

    But official…

    At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

    One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

    It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

    And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
    "Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

    Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

    As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

    Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

    The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

    That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

    The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

    That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

    Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

    Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

    On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

    Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
    Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

    Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

    Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

    And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

    But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
    The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…