Skip to main content

The gap in yesterday's ESDC documents: the new use for 470 Vanderbilt and its impact on traffic, parking, and pedestrians

There's one very big gap in the seemingly comprehensive Technical Analysis (embedded below) released yesterday by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) as part of its findings that a 25-year buildout of the Atlantic Yards project would not require a Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement.

It's called 470 Vanderbilt Avenue, the former tire plant turned telecom offices turned combination office and housing complex, located just north of the northeast block of the Atlantic Yards site. (Click on graphic to enlarge; highlighting in red is added.)

The plans for 470 Vanderbilt have changed significantly in the past year, as it's slated to house the city Human Resources Administration, with 1880 employees and 1500 clients a day, opening in Spring 2012, just before the arena is scheduled to open.

And the city aims to add parking along Atlantic Avenue, which contradicts a mitigation in the Atlantic Yards plan.

When the City Planning Commission approved the plan in September, it noted that "a letter was received from a resident of the surrounding area suggesting that with respect to this action and Atlantic Yards that a full Environmental Impact Study should be performed by the City under ULURP which is outside the scope of this action."

Perhaps, but the changes are not acknowledged in the ESDC documents. As in the 2009 Technical Memorandum, 470 Vanderbilt is described as:
376 residential units, 115,424 sf retail, 579,645 sf office, 397 accessory parking spaces7
Build Year 2035
Footnote 7 states:
Includes 578,554 sf of existing office and 200 existing parking spaces; project will add 1,091 sf office and 197 accessory parking spaces.
The analysis

There's no mention of the new use. In the new ESDC analysis, 470 Vanderbilt gets a mention under the category of Pedestrians (but not regarding Transit or Parking):
As discussed in the FEIS, existing pedestrian volumes at the Project site are relatively low, and all analyzed sidewalks, corner areas, and crosswalks are expected to operate at good levels of service (LOS A or B) in all peak hours under 2016 No Build conditions. The Extended Build-Out Scenario would increase No Build volumes by approximately ten percent (i.e., 0.5 percent/year). Given the low existing baseline volumes, this added background growth would result in the addition of fewer than two persons per minute at any analyzed facility in any peak hour. This small increase in volume compared to the volumes analyzed in the FEIS is not expected to result in any new significant adverse impacts at any analyzed sidewalk, corner area or crosswalk.

As shown in Table 4 and discussed above, peak hour transit demand from discrete No Build sites in the vicinity of Downtown Brooklyn is generally expected to be lower than was forecast in the FEIS due to changes in anticipated No Build development since the FEIS analyses were conducted. Overall, this would be expected to result in somewhat fewer pedestrian trips at analyzed sidewalks, corner areas and crosswalks than was originally forecast. It should be noted, however, that one new development not previously analyzed in the FEIS—470 Vanderbilt Avenue—would add approximately 376 dwelling units, 1,091 square feet of office space, and 115,424 square feet of retail space in proximity to the intersection of Vanderbilt and Atlantic Avenues at the northeast corner of the Project site. As all analyzed sidewalks, corner areas, and crosswalks at this intersection were predicted in the FEIS to operate at high levels of service (LOS A or B) in all peak hours under 2016 Build conditions, the additional pedestrian demand from this one development, coupled with the additional background growth under the Extended Build-Out Scenario, is not expected to result in any new significant adverse pedestrian impacts.
Unmentioned is the actual expected use for 470 Vanderbilt.

Public comments yesterday

At the ESDC board meeting yesterday, Prospect Heights residents Wayne Bailey (first video) and Alan Rosner (second video) reminded the board of the impact of 470 Vanderbilt.

"These changes aren't cottage cheese," declared Rosner. They "must be addressed." At that point, no members of the public had seen the ESDC documentation.

The 470 Vanderbilt back story

The Times's blog The Local reported 9/16/10:
In an about-face, Community Board 2 gave their stamp of approval Tuesday to a plan to lease parts of a block-long building on Vanderbilt Avenue for use as a welfare services center.

...The vote passed Community Board 2 Tuesday night with 27 in favor and one opposed. Board member Lawrence Whiteside said the selling point was the influx of business from employees.

“The idea of 2,000 additional customers to Fort Greene restaurants and shops is critical at a time like this,” Mr. Whiteside said.
Adding parking, contradicting FEIS?

At the 9/21/10 meeting of the Community Board 2 Transportation & Public Safety Committee, board members considered a proposal to increase parking near 470 Vanderbilt. The notes (embedded below) state:
Christopher Hrones, Downtown Brooklyn Transportation Coordinator for the Department of Transportation (DOT), presented a conceptual plan to increase the number of parking spaces in the vicinity of 470 Vanderbilt Avenue, a building that will be occupied in 2012 by offices of the city’s Human Resources Administration (HRA). Only five parking placards are to be issued to HRA staff. Although staff and clients will be urged to use mass transit, and shuttle bus transportation from and to the Atlantic Avenue subway hub and Long Island Rail Road terminal has been promised for staff, DOT has looked for additional curbside parking and identified the following potential locations:

Atlantic Avenue, between Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues: Elimination of 4-7 p.m. parking restriction on south side of the street would create 40 spaces.
(Emphasis added)

However, that seems to contradict the mitigation planned in the Atlantic Yards Final Environmental Statement, Chapter 19:
As shown in Figure 19-2 [excerpt at left, in full below], geometric and operational improvements to enhance vehicle flow and pedestrian safety are also proposed as mitigation at the intersection of Atlantic and Vanderbilt Avenues. These improvements would include:
2. Implementation of a no standing anytime regulation for 150 feet along the south curb on eastbound Atlantic Avenue approaching Vanderbilt Avenue (in place of the existing no standing 4-7 PM regulation) and re-striping the approach to accommodate an exclusive right- turn-only lane
(Emphasis added)

Adding to the impact

The influx of people at the this intersection presumably would affect traffic, though it's likely the larger impact would be on transit. According to the Mitigation chapter of the FEIS, the intersection would already be burdened:
As shown in Table 12-16 in Chapter 12, the proposed project would result in significant adverse impacts at the intersection of Atlantic and Vanderbilt Avenues in all but the weekday 10-11 PM peak hour in 2016. Eastbound and westbound Atlantic Avenue would experience significant adverse impacts in each of these periods... As shown in Table 19-4, with the proposed geometric and operational improvements at this intersection, unmitigated significant impacts would remain on the westbound approach in the AM peak hour, the eastbound approach in the PM and Saturday post-game peak hours, the southbound approach in the PM and the westbound left-turn movement in the weekday PM, pre-game and Saturday post-game peak hours. All other significant impacts would be fully mitigated.
(Emphasis added)

Note that the table seems to look at 2010, not 2016. The mitigations would presumably resolve traffic problems eastbound on Atlantic Avenue during the day--but not if parking is added along the south side of Atlantic.

Is there coordination going on? According to both the 2009 Amended Memorandum of Environmental Commitments and precursor 2006 Memorandum of Mitigation Commitments:
It is expected that NYCDOT will implement areawide signal coordination, timing changes, curbside parking regulation changes, changes in travel direction and other operational changes, as described in the FEIS. FCRC shall cooperate with NYCDOT in the implementation of such changes including keeping NYCDOT apprised of the progress of the Project’s construction.
ESDC Atlantic Yards Memo 121310a

ESDC Atlantic Yards Memo121310b

CB2 minutes re 470 Vanderbilt

DCP on 470 Vanderbilt

Fig 19-2 from Atlantic Yards FEIS, Vanderbilt at Atlantic


Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

This graphic, posted in November 2017, is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. Note the unbuilt B1 and the proposed shift in bulk to the unbuilt Site 5.

The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change. The project is already well behind that tentative timetable.

How many people are expected?

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park has a projected 6,430 apartments housing 2.1 persons per unit (as per Chapter 4 of the 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement), which would mean 13,503 new residents, with 1,890 among them in low-income affordable rentals, and 2,835 in moderate- and middle-income affordable rentals.

That leaves 8,778 people in market-rate rentals and condos, though let's call it 8,358 after subtracting 420 who may live in 200 promised below-market condos. So that's 5,145 in below-market units, though many of them won't be so cheap.


Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park in 2017: no new towers, unfilled affordable units, Islanders prepare to leave, project timetable fuzzy

My 2018 preview.

It was another wait-and-see year for Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, with one big twist--the beginning of a slow goodbye for the New York Islanders--but continued delays for towers, a lost (mostly) 421-a subsidy for condos, and new skepticism about unfilled not-so-affordable housing units.

So ongoing questions linger regarding the project's pace, affordability, and even future ownership.

In my 2017 preview, I predicted--not exactly going out on a limb--that two and likely three more towers would open, though it would be unclear how fast they'd lease up and sell.

Indeed, we've learned that the middle-income below-market units at 461 Dean (which opened in 2016) and 535 Carlton have leased very slowly, while it's too soon to assess progress for commensurate units at 38 Sixth. (At 535 Carlton and 38 Sixth, middle-income units make up half the "100% affordable" buildings.) Meanwhile, many apartments are up for rent at the 550 Vanderbilt condo buildin…