Skip to main content

In Ombudsman's response, ESDC maintains dubious timetable, says Carlton Ave. Bridge might reopen for pedestrians

(This is one in an irregular series of articles about issues that a State Senate committee might address when it holds a hearing on Atlantic Yards.)

Atlantic Yards Ombudsman Forrest Taylor has responded with the Empire State Development Corporation's (ESDC) answers to several questions raised at Taylor's February 11 public appearance in Brooklyn sponsored by the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods (CBN).

In one case, at least, the official ESDC answer--that construction would be completed during the ten-year timeframe set out in the General Project Plan (GPP)--contradicts ESDC CEO Marisa Lago's acknowledgment last month that the project would take decades.

So I think any further claim of a ten-year timetable should be backed up not merely by a construction schedule--which indicates technical possibility--but by a "probabilistic" date that indicates what might go wrong.

The ESDC, in its answers, does not offer much in the way of compromise, except for being willing to entertain the option of temporarily reopening the Carlton Avenue Bridge for pedestrians.

CBN shared the document with me. I've bolded the questions and put the answers in italic, all verbatim, then interpolated some of my own comments.

1. Q. Terry Urban, re: Carlton Avenue Bridge.

A. The bridge was expected to be closed for a couple of years as construction progressed; however, as a result of the temporary construction slow down, we are currently working with FCRC on a revised timeline and schedule. ESDC is very focused on the inconvenience that the bridge closure presents and we continue to work with FCRC to make sure the bridge is not closed any longer than is absolutely necessary. The idea of having the bridge opened, at least for pedestrian use in the short term, is an interesting idea that we will raise with FCRC and the City to see if it's feasible while insuring the safety for all pedestrians.

Their willingness to entertain even a short-term reopening suggests that construction work is not expected to resume soon. Urban had asked if a temporary bridge with two-way access could be provided.

2. Q. Daniel Goldstein, re: Parking.

A. Regarding the request for no parking, temporary construction regulations would need to be changed on 6th Avenue between Pacific and Dean Streets. Currently, on the east side, no parking is a permanent regulation and existed before construction commenced; on the west side, DOT could authorize the contractor to replace "no parking" signs with the regulations that were in place before only if no work is planned for this block in the near future. Since ESDC expects FCRC to resume work in the near future, there is no reason to ask DOT to make the change now, only to have to change it again in a few months.

It's unclear why work is expected "in the near future" on this block but not on the Carlton Avenue bridge. Goldstein had asked if "no parking for temporary construction" signs could be removed.

3. Q. Daniel Goldstein, re: Feasibility of project.

A. ESDC and FCRC continue to support the project and believe that the entire project is feasible and will be completed. ESDC and FCRC will soon release an updated construction timetable, which will include any budget and/or design changes to the project.

This begs a question: what exactly is the project?

If the developer has up to six years to build the arena (after delivery of property via eminent domain) and 12 years to build Phase 1, with no timetable for Phase 2 (all according to the State Funding Agreement) and Phase 1 can be 44% smaller (according to the City Funding Agreement), the project looks quite different.

4. Q. Eric McClure, re: FDNY response times analysis.

A. We are unaware of any analysis performed by the FDNY regarding response times for the Carlton Avenue Bridge.

Maybe it's worth asking the firefighters whether the bridge closing has hampered their work.

5. Q. Eric McClure, re: Traffic Plan.

A. The traffic plan during construction continues to be revised pending the resumption of construction activity at the site. Once construction plans and schedules are in place, the traffic plans will be shared with the community.

Let's assume that information will be shared at or before the State Senate hearing May 29.

6. Q. Eric McClure, re: Arena cost.

A. FCRC's most recent estimate of the cost of the arena is $950 million. FCRC has been undergoing an exercise in value engineering to decrease the cost. Once the exercise is completed and the project is ready to resume, the cost, as well as other aspects of the project, will be shared with the community.

Again, this information should emerge sooner rather than later.

7. Q. Joanne Simon, re: When is the project, no longer the project?

A. ESDC and FCRC remain committed to the project in its entirety. Once construction commences, it is expected that the entire project would be completed within the timeframe set out in the GPP.

This has already been contradicted by Lago's statements, the City and State Funding Agreements, and even the latest information from Forest City Enterprises. Simon had pointed to the many announced changes in the project; let's assume we will get some clarification soon about those changes.

Given multiple reports that Forest City Ratner is pursuing indirect subsidies, as well as the New York Observer's recent observation (via NLG) that "large projects seem to rarely provide the public with the value initially advertised, at least not within the time frame once imagined," this issue deserves a lot more scrutiny at the Senate hearing.


Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

No, security guards can't ban photos. Questions remain about visibility of ID/sticker system.

The bi-monthly Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Community Update meeting June 14, held at 55 Hanson Place, addressed multiple issues, including delays in the project, a new detente with project neighbors,concerns about traffic congestion, upcoming sewer work and demolitions, and an explanation of how high winds caused debris to fly off the under-construction 38 Sixth Avenue building. I'll have more coverage.
Security issues came up several times at the meeting.
Wayne Bailey, a resident who regularly takes photos and videos (that I often use) of construction/operations issues that impact residents, asked representatives of Tishman Construction if the security guard at the sites they're building works for them.
After Tishman Senior VP Eric Reid said yes, Bailey asked why a guard told him not to shoot video of the site, even though he was on a public street.

"I will address it with principals for that security firm," Reid said.
Forest City Ratner executive Ashley Cotton, the …

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park graphic: what's built/what might be coming (post-dated pinned post)

Click on graphic to enlarge. This is post-dated to stay at the top of the blog. It will be updated as announced configurations change and buildings launch. The August 2014 tentative configurations proposed by developer Greenland Forest City Partners will change, and the project is already well behind that tentative timetable.

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…