Skip to main content

State Senator Perkins sets oversight hearing on Atlantic Yards for May 29

After one postponement and some questions as to timing, the oversight hearing regarding Atlantic Yards has been scheduled by the Senate Standing Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions, chaired by Senator Bill Perkins, for the afternoon of Friday May 29.

I've posted several questions/issues I think the hearing should address, and will be posting more.

Among the issues to be covered in all of four hours: the current status of the project; the public cost; the process behind and impact of eminent domain; the cost of the arena and impact of default; and conditions under which a developer is considered in default.

(Scroll to bottom for information on submitting testimony)

Looking at the timetable

Note that the announcement states that the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) gave Forest City Ratner Companies (FCRC or FCR) 10 years to develop the project but the developer has not begun construction almost three years after gaining approvals.

Well, given that approvals from the ESDC and Public Authorities Control Board (PACB) came in December 2006, the time lapse is about 2.5 years.

More importantly, the timetable, according to the State Funding Agreement, hasn't even started. It gives FCR six years to build the arena after the close of litigation and the ESDC's exercise of eminent domain to acquire needed properties. It gives FCR 12 years to build the five towers of Phase I after the close of litigation and the ESDC's exercise of eminent domain to acquire needed properties. And there's no timetable for the eleven towers of Phase II.

Official announcement

The announcement, via NLG:

SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON Corporations, Authorities and Commissions, Senator Bill Perkins, Chair

Subject
Atlantic Yards: Where are we now; How did we get here; Where is the Project going?
Testimony by invitation only. Written submissions welcome!

Purpose:
To elicit recommendations for improved accountability, and transparency, land use planning, and community participation for large scale development.

Friday, May 29
1PM - 5 PM
Pratt Institute, Higgins Hall
61 St. James Place (corner Lafayette Ave.)
Brooklyn, NY 11238

Description
The Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Plan (AY Plan) was announced by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), a public authority, in 2003. The plan includes a 19,000 seat Arena and 16 high rises which are to be built during a ten year time period. The 22 acre site adjoins the neighborhoods of Fort Greene, Prospect Heights, Parks Slope and Boerum Hill in Brooklyn. It includes an 8 acre site owned by the MTA, and other properties owned by the City and private property owners. The Plan received all of its approvals in December 2006. The approval includes an override of the local zoning laws; an override of a more strict NYC Environmental Review; and approved taking properties by Eminent Domain.

The ESDC designated Forest City Ratner Corporation (FCRC) as the sole developer. New York State and New York City have committed to subsidize the Project through issuing bonding debts, infrastructure improvements, and other subsidies.

The Committee will hear testimony regarding financing, project oversight and the role of the Empire State Development Corporation, a public authority, in the Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Plan (AY Plan).

The Committee will hear testimony to ascertain:

(1) The status of the Brooklyn Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Plan (AY Plan).

After approval of the project in 2006 FCRC has been quoted in various media as having delayed the opening date of the arena, changed the number of affordable units and the scale of the project. What is the plan now?

(2) Cost, the extent of public financing commitments through bonding, Payments In Lieu of Taxes (PILOTS), infra-structure improvements, and other public subsidies.

· What is the total public expenditure and cost of subsidies through infrastructure improvements, tax breaks, abatements, undervalued land, Brownfield tax credits, green construction tax credits, and reimbursements for land acquisition? · FCRC has applied for bonding to build affordable housing. Where has the developer applied for bonding, for how much and what is the per unit subsidy? · What amount has been set for the non arena PILOTS, and what is the formula for reimbursement for city services?

(3) The process for use and the impact of eminent domain.

(4) The cost of the arena

· How much will the arena bond issue be and the PILOT to pay off the bonds? · If there is a default on the arena bond who will be responsible to pay off the debt?

(5) Conditions under which a developer is considered in default.

· The ESDC gave FCRC 10 years to develop the project. FCRC has not yet begun construction almost three years after gaining approvals. The ESDC has given the developer extensions. At what point will the ESDC say “Enough is enough,” no more extensions because of the lack of activity. · Where is the point at which the ESDC will consider FCRC in default vis a vis the Memorandum of Understanding between the City, State and FCRC? And, if and when FCRC is declared in default does the ESDC agree that FCRC loses all rights to transfer, and/or sell any aspect of the project to another developer or entity.

Persons wishing to present testimony at the hearing should complete and return the attached reply form by Wednesday, May 20. You may reply by email, regular mail, or fax. It is important that the reply form be fully completed and returned so that persons may be notified in the event of postponement or cancelation of the hearing.

Testimony at the hearing is by Committee invitation only. However, written comments will be accepted by all who wish to submit comments.

The Public is encouraged to attend the hearing.

Witnesses are asked to keep oral testimony to no more than ten minutes. Written testimony will also be accepted and may be sent to the contact person listed on the reply form. In preparing the order of witnesses, the Committees will attempt to accommodate individual requests to speak at particular times in view of special circumstances. If you are testifying, please submit ten copies of any prepared testimony at the hearing registration desk. In order to further publicize the hearing, please inform interested parties of the Committee’s interest in receiving written testimony from all sources.

In order to meet the needs of those who may have a disability, the New York State Senate and Assembly have made their facilities and services available to all individuals with disabilities. Accommodation will be provided to individuals with disabilities upon reasonable request, to afford such individuals access and admission to Senate and Assembly facilities and activities.

Addendum: Reply Form

PUBLIC HEARING REPLY FORM

Persons wishing to present testimony at the Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions public hearing on May 29, 2009 regarding the status and progress of the Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment project are requested to complete this reply form and return by email, regular mail, or fax.

To Reply by e-mail
1. Click on your email program's Reply button.
2. You can then complete the form on your computer. (The correct email addresses should already be in the Reply form It should be addressed to dannyserranoesq@gmail.com.)
3. Click on Send.
To reply by regular mail or fax
You can print out this email message or print out the attachments. Complete the form and send using the information below.

Daniel Serrano, Esq.
Director of Public Policy
Office of Senator Bill Perkins, Chair Corporations, Authorities and Commissions Committee
New York State Senate
163 West 125th Street
New York, NY 10027
Phone: 212-222-7315, Fax: 212-678-0001

I would like to testify at the hearing on May 29, 2009.

I plan to attend, but will not testify at the hearing on May 29, 2009.

I plan to submit written testimony, only, at the hearing on May 29, 2009.

I will require assistance and/or handicapped accessibility information.

Please indicate the type of assistance required (enter response in box below):

NAME:
TITLE:
ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESS:
E-MAIL:
TELEPHONE:
FAX:

Comments

  1. I couldn't find the "attached reply form" that must be filled out for those wishing to present testimony. I didn't find anything, not even the press release, on a search of the Senate's site.

    Do you know where to find this reply form?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…