Skip to main content

Senator Perkins begins to gear up for Atlantic Yards oversight hearing, but it won’t be held April 24

If a legislative oversight hearing on Atlantic Yards scheduled this month sounded too soon to be true, well, that was right.

More pressing Senate business has delayed the tentatively scheduled April 24 hearing by the Senate Standing Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions regarding the performance of agencies like the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA).

It may make for a more thorough hearing, as well, since Senate Committee Chair Bill Perkins, as well as his main staff member working on the issue, are clearly still getting up to speed on Atlantic Yards.

Coming to Brooklyn

Perkins, a Harlem Democrat who last September held an oversight hearing on eminent domain, came to Brooklyn Saturday to meet with about 15 people--mostly but not exclusively critics and opponents of AY--to be briefed on the project.

Among the group were State Senator Velmanette Montgomery, City Council Member Letitia James, City Council candidate JoAnne Simon, Prospect Heights Action Coalition founder Patti Hagan, Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods (CBN) co-chair Terry Urban, and Lincoln Restler, who was appointed by Council Member David Yassky appointment to Community Board 2. (A CBN officer, Jim Vogel, now works in Montgomery's office.)

The group met privately with Perkins. Then, introduced by Montgomery, Perkins held a brief press conference for, well, myself and a reporter and photographer from the Courier-Life chain.

After the press conference, Perkins and his group left the Fort Greene meeting place for a planned walk around the AY footprint.

Given wind and rain, that plan was untenable, so the group wound up on the third floor of Forest City Ratner’s Atlantic Center, where a good view was available of the MTA’s Vanderbilt Yard and the rest of the AY footprint’s first phase, checkerboarded with both existing buildings and vacant lots.

(In photo above, Perkins, center, is flanked by Eric McClure of Park Slope Neighbors/NoLandGrab at right and Ron Shiffman of Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn at left. To the left of Shiffman in the photo, in partial view, are Montgomery and Regina Cahill of the North Flatbush Business Improvement District. Photos of group by Steve Soblick.)

Hearing goal

Montgomery explained that Perkins “has agreed to use the experience we had here as an example of what happens or does not happen in terms of megadevelopments around the state.”

Perkins pointed out that, in light of the economic downturn, there are many questions about the viability of Atlantic Yards and other projects, so “it’s appropriate and necessary from the perspective of the public interest, to review where the project is at.”

That involves a look at issues that may need to be reconsidered, modifications that may need to be made, and what additional public resources are being considered for this project.

CBA role

The Courier-Life's Steve Witt asked if Perkins had spoken to any of the signatories of the controversial Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement.

Perkins said he wasn’t sure. Montgomery--a foe of the project--noted that no CBA signatories were present. Perkins followed up by saying he’d look at a broad range of agencies and community groups, but “we’re not at that point yet... we’re just getting a sense of what the project looks like.”

Asked about the priority issues, Perkins focused on the need for transparency regarding changes in the project, the prospect of federal stimulus funding, the current time frame, and community involvement. Eminent domain will remain a theme, as well questions of community benefits, in both their broad and narrow sense, he said.

The walkaround

During the walk to the mall, veteran community planner Shiffman pointed out how the term blight had been used to pursue the project.

“One of the things we’ll have to do is get a real definition of blight,” said Perkins, raising an issue that has been proposed but never moved forward in the legislature.

Perkins was informed of some basic elements of the AY project: the number of housing units planned, the need for major and concentrated housing subsidies, the bid process for the railyards, and the provision--or absence--of public services like schools.

What about the empty buildings and lots? Forest City Ratner bought them, under the threat of eminent domain, McClure pointed out.

(Yards photo adapted from Atlantic Yards site. Red ovals mark buildings since demolished.)

Many property owners did benefit from increased prices, noted Cahill, though commercial businesses, added Peter Krashes of the Dean Street Block Association, did have a harder time.

Of course, the gains made by homeowners came thanks not to Ratner’s generosity but to public funding--and, even if the developer had paid from its own pocket, the benefit in terms of vastly incrased development rights would have been worth it.

Perkins was told of the history of spot rezonings, converting former manufacturing buildings into housing, and of the organic development that emerged along Vanderbilt Avenue (a visit precluded by the rain).

The UNITY alternative

Shiffman explained the UNITY plan he helped devise, in which the railyard site, at least, would be divided into smaller develoment sites, “so you’re not dependent on the economics of one builder and one developer.” The plan, he added, would also connect better to adjacent Fort Greene.

Development over the railyards, Shiffman acknowledged, would not be cheap, but the direct footprint might be reduced, and it may not even be necessary to store trains in Brooklyn should, for example, the Long Island Rail Road and New Jersey Transit become knit in a regional transportation system.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…