Skip to main content

Looking at the 33rd district race, AY, and some undercurrents

So, the debate Monday night among six of the seven candidates running to succeed City Council Member David Yassky got a significant amount of coverage, but, since no one looked closely at the Atlantic Yards angle, I’ll address AY and some other issues.

(I didn’t attend the debate at St. Francis College, but Noticing New York’s Michael D.D. White shared a digital file.)

The Brooklyn Paper’s Politicrasher columnist didn’t mention the AY issue. (Clarified: I originally attributed the column to the prolific Gersh Kuntzman, who was spotted at the debate, but can't be certain, though I do believe he at least had a hand in it.)

The column called the debate “the latest in a seemingly endless series of mirth-free events that are doing more to drive people away from the political process than towards it. The main problem is that the candidates differ little on substance, leaving an audience member to ponder the not-so-subtle, and not-so-appealing, differences in each candidate’s style.”

Here’s more from Aaron Short (“Fascinatingly normal debate”), Sarah Portlock (“long and routine”), and Louise Crawford (“But for the most part, they're all on the same page...).

Political undercurrents

While the candidates bring different (and significant) experience, the insider newspaper City Hall points to some political undercurrents; candidates Jo Anne Simon, a lawyer and district leader from Boerum Hill, has longstanding tensions with Brooklyn Democratic leader Vito Lopez, whose chief of staff, Stephen Levin, was the one candidate who didn’t attend the debate. (Nor has Levin yet returned a questionnaire to CBID.)

And Yassky has yet to endorse his former chief of staff, Evan Thies, apparently because he’s agreed to stay neutral to gain Lopez’s endorsement in his run for Comptroller.

City Hall suggests that the leaders are Levin and Simon (who has ties to Assemblyman Joan Millman)--though the number of candidates can make the race interesting, and the presence of Hasidic candidate Isaac Abraham could cut into Levin’s hope for a strong Hasidic vote.

During the debate, longtime activist and affordable housing developer Ken Diamondstone cited his independence, saying the “critical and unspoken subtext” of the race was the candidates’ relationship to the Democratic party. He took a potshot at Simon for claiming to be a reformer but, according to the City Hall report, agreeing with Lopez 80 percent of the time.

Against Bloomberg

On the Brooklyn Paper’s web site, White commented that the event “could hardly be considered a “yawn” given the candidates’ pretty much universal objections to the current administration’s development policies and big project initiatives. Isn’t Bloomberg’s ability to create such unity a fascination in itself?”

(Interestingly enough--most of the comments on the Brooklyn Paper’s web site came from supporters of Isaac Abraham, who’s lagging in fundraising.)

Indeed, all the candidates endorsed a statement that the mayor did an end-run around the public in extending term limits.

Perhaps the hosts, the Central Brooklyn Independent Democrats and the Independent Neighborhood Democrats, might have put the candidates more on the spot, asking them, for example, what they think of Yassky’s performance and how they differ with the absent candidate, Levin.

An odd district

Given that the 33rd District (I’m a resident) is shaped somewhat like a bat, reaching from Greenpoint to Park Slope, the race has attracted candidates from various places: Abraham from Williamsburg; environmentalist Ken Baer from Park Slope; Doug Biviano (who spoke with authority, focusing on education) from Brooklyn Heights; Diamondstone from Boerum Hill; Levin from Greenpoint; Simon from Boerum Hill; and Thies from Williamsburg.

(Map from City Hall)

Not surprisingly, in comments at the debate and on their web sites, the three candidates from the northern part of the district focus on development challenges in those areas, but Thies--who’s been involved in development issues in Northern Brooklyn--also stressed Atlantic Yards.

Other factors beyond geography include gender--Simon is the only woman in the race--and potential bloc voting in the Hasidic community.

About AY and development

From comments at the debate, Baer, Biviano, and Diamondstone all opposed Atlantic Yards, standing with the Develop Don’t Destroy Brooklyn coalition. Baer and Diamondstone have been longstanding opponents.

Simon, who has paid critical attention to Atlantic Yards, has allied herself with the mend-it-don’t-end-it coalition, BrooklynSpeaks. She announced that she promised not to take contributions from developers.

Thies, who has not been associated with DDDB, forcefully criticized AY as “a gaping monument to how bad the city and state have gotten at these development plans.”
While Abraham didn't say anything at the debate about Atlantic Yards, a questionnaire he returned to CBID indicated his opposition "from the very first minute."

Baer, Diamondstone, and Thies agreed that AY was the biggest boondoggle among projects. Simon said it’s very hard to know, “because we don't have good numbers” on many of the projects, though she also criticized “single site control,” which also applies to AY.

Several of the candidates emphasized community planning and community board reform, an issue that Borough President Marty Markowitz has yet to endorse. Simon cited her work on shaping development at Hoyt and Schermerhorn.

Thies has probably the most extensive set of suggestions, proposing "360 Degree Planning":
Evan has proposed that the Uniform Land Use Review Process – the City’s planning process – be amended to include input on any major project from the departments of education, transportation, sanitation, buildings, police and fire.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

For Atlantic Yards Quality of Life meeting Sept. 19, another bare-bones agenda (green wall?)

A message from Empire State Development (ESD) reminds us that the next Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Quality of Life Meeting--which aims to update community members on construction and other issues--will be held:
Tuesday, September 19, 2017 @ 6 pm
Shirley Chisholm State Office Building
55 Hanson Place
1st Floor Conference Room
Brooklyn, NY 11217 The typically bare-bones, agenda, below, tells us nothing about the content of the presentation. One thing to look for is any hint of plans to start a new building on the southeast block of the project by the end of the year.

If not, ESD is supposed to re-evaluate a longstanding request from project neighbors to move back a giant wall encroaching on part of Dean Street between Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues. It's said to enclose construction activity, but, in recent months, has significantly served to protect worker parking.

Also, by the way, if you search for Atlantic Yards on Google or the ESD website, it leads to this page for the Atlantic Ya…