Skip to main content

Today, state entity poised to approve refinancing of Barclays Center bonds, saving Prokhorov millions

Today, at an 11 am meeting (which will be webcast), the "dummy not-for-profit" Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corporation (BALDC) is expected to approve a refinancing of a "all or substantially all" of the remaining portion of the $511 million tax-exempt bonds used to pay off construction of the Barclays Center.

(The overall total of payments, given interest, is far more than $511 million.)

Details on the amount and interest rate are unavailable in the board materials (also below), but surely the decision, which aims to take advantage of today's local interest rates (versus the original 2009 bonds), will save arena operator Mikhail Prokhorov's Onexim Sports & Entertainment tens of millions of dollars. Prokhorov, who owned 45% of the arena operating company, bought the majority from Forest City Ratner/Forest City Enterprises around the end of last year.

The fig leaf of state ownership of the arena--which is then leased for a song to the arena operator--allows for tax-exempt bonds and lower interest rates. Bonds are repaid out of arena revenues, which are considered payments in lieu of taxes, or PILOTs.

Also planned is approval of an unspecified amount of first-ever taxable bonds, which presumably will have a higher interest rate, but--despite no guarantees of public backing--will benefit from the association with a governmental entity.

(The BALDC, which has no dedicated staff or budget, is a creation of an Empire State Development alter ego/affiliate, the Job Development Authority, or JDA, but is essentially an ESD alter ego. The use of the BALDC meant the bonds avoided the scrutiny of the Public Authorities Control Board.)

Limited details

Limited information on the bond issuance appears beginning on p. 52 of the 61-page of the board materials. The document indicates that some bonds may not be refunded, and also points to "any additional PILOT bonds issued in the future."

Attachments (see. p. 56) include exhibits, such as a Preliminary Official Statement, which are being provided to the Directors only. (The BALDC directors are various state officials.) So much for transparency.

Underwriters = bonus for felon Barclays

The underwriters are Goldman Sachs as "book running Senior Manager," with the participation of Siebert Brandford Shank, a MWBE firm, and Barclays Capital as Senior Managers.

Barclays was chosen (see p. 55) for its "experience with and support for the project." In other words, because Barclays bought naming rights, it gets bond issuance fees. Sweet!

As I've argued, Barclays should not be doing business with New York State, and should lose the naming rights deal, because the company's plea to a felony--for rigging the foreign exchange market--should make it a "prohibited person" under state rules.

Counsel appointment and fees

Most of the board materials related to hiring special counsel and adopting board resolutions.

Counsel fees--see p. 31 of the board materials--can equal up to 2% of overall bond proceeds. Bizarrely enough--see for example p. 31 and p. 38--another entity, the New York Transportation Development Corporation (which has issued bonds for JFK airport work) is also involved in the process. This other development corporation is also a JDA affiliate.

State assistance and the opportunity for leverage

The move today, on the one hand, seems understandable. Who wouldn't want to refinance at a lower interest rate?

However, it should serve as a reminder that New York State actions are now in service to a Russian billionaire and, as I've written, it's unlikely governmental leaders would have been as generous had the applicant been a Russian oligarch.


Also, it could be an opportunity for New York State to exercise leverage.

After all, as I suggested in October 2014, a nonbinding clause in a state document (right) says the arena operator and/or team would pay additional fees to Empire State Development, the public agency that formally owns and leases the arena, for the right to have a second professional sports team.

That clause was in the 2/18/05 Memorandum of Understanding that original arena developer Forest City Ratner signed with New York City and New York State, public parties involved in the Atlantic Yards deal.

But it was nonbinding. And ESD refused to answer my queries about it. It was plausible for the public parties to ask for more, because it implies that the arena would gain additional revenue from another team, eased by the significant public contribution--direct subsidies, tax breaks, giveaway of naming rights, override of zoning, inside deal on railyard development rights--that allowed arena construction.


BALDC Board Materials Aug. 8, 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

So, Forest City has some property subject to the future Gowanus rezoning

Writing yesterday, MAP: Who Owns All the Property Along the Gowanus Canal, DNAinfo's Leslie Albrecht lays out the positioning of various real estate players along the Gowanus Canal, a Superfund site:
As the city considers whether to rezone Gowanus and, perhaps, morph the gritty low-rise industrial area into a hot new neighborhood of residential towers (albeit at a fraction of the height of Manhattan's supertall buildings), DNAinfo reviewed property records along the canal to find out who stands to benefit most from the changes.
Investors have poured at least $440 million into buying land on the polluted waterway and more than a third of the properties have changed hands in the past decade, according to an examination of records for the nearly 130 properties along the 1.8-mile canal. While the single largest landowner is developer Property Markets Group, other landowners include Kushner Companies, Alloy Development, Two Trees, and Forest City New York.

Forest City's plans unc…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…