Skip to main content

Today, state entity poised to approve refinancing of Barclays Center bonds, saving Prokhorov millions

Today, at an 11 am meeting (which will be webcast), the "dummy not-for-profit" Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corporation (BALDC) is expected to approve a refinancing of a "all or substantially all" of the remaining portion of the $511 million tax-exempt bonds used to pay off construction of the Barclays Center.

(The overall total of payments, given interest, is far more than $511 million.)

Details on the amount and interest rate are unavailable in the board materials (also below), but surely the decision, which aims to take advantage of today's local interest rates (versus the original 2009 bonds), will save arena operator Mikhail Prokhorov's Onexim Sports & Entertainment tens of millions of dollars. Prokhorov, who owned 45% of the arena operating company, bought the majority from Forest City Ratner/Forest City Enterprises around the end of last year.

The fig leaf of state ownership of the arena--which is then leased for a song to the arena operator--allows for tax-exempt bonds and lower interest rates. Bonds are repaid out of arena revenues, which are considered payments in lieu of taxes, or PILOTs.

Also planned is approval of an unspecified amount of first-ever taxable bonds, which presumably will have a higher interest rate, but--despite no guarantees of public backing--will benefit from the association with a governmental entity.

(The BALDC, which has no dedicated staff or budget, is a creation of an Empire State Development alter ego/affiliate, the Job Development Authority, or JDA, but is essentially an ESD alter ego. The use of the BALDC meant the bonds avoided the scrutiny of the Public Authorities Control Board.)

Limited details

Limited information on the bond issuance appears beginning on p. 52 of the 61-page of the board materials. The document indicates that some bonds may not be refunded, and also points to "any additional PILOT bonds issued in the future."

Attachments (see. p. 56) include exhibits, such as a Preliminary Official Statement, which are being provided to the Directors only. (The BALDC directors are various state officials.) So much for transparency.

Underwriters = bonus for felon Barclays

The underwriters are Goldman Sachs as "book running Senior Manager," with the participation of Siebert Brandford Shank, a MWBE firm, and Barclays Capital as Senior Managers.

Barclays was chosen (see p. 55) for its "experience with and support for the project." In other words, because Barclays bought naming rights, it gets bond issuance fees. Sweet!

As I've argued, Barclays should not be doing business with New York State, and should lose the naming rights deal, because the company's plea to a felony--for rigging the foreign exchange market--should make it a "prohibited person" under state rules.

Counsel appointment and fees

Most of the board materials related to hiring special counsel and adopting board resolutions.

Counsel fees--see p. 31 of the board materials--can equal up to 2% of overall bond proceeds. Bizarrely enough--see for example p. 31 and p. 38--another entity, the New York Transportation Development Corporation (which has issued bonds for JFK airport work) is also involved in the process. This other development corporation is also a JDA affiliate.

State assistance and the opportunity for leverage

The move today, on the one hand, seems understandable. Who wouldn't want to refinance at a lower interest rate?

However, it should serve as a reminder that New York State actions are now in service to a Russian billionaire and, as I've written, it's unlikely governmental leaders would have been as generous had the applicant been a Russian oligarch.


Also, it could be an opportunity for New York State to exercise leverage.

After all, as I suggested in October 2014, a nonbinding clause in a state document (right) says the arena operator and/or team would pay additional fees to Empire State Development, the public agency that formally owns and leases the arena, for the right to have a second professional sports team.

That clause was in the 2/18/05 Memorandum of Understanding that original arena developer Forest City Ratner signed with New York City and New York State, public parties involved in the Atlantic Yards deal.

But it was nonbinding. And ESD refused to answer my queries about it. It was plausible for the public parties to ask for more, because it implies that the arena would gain additional revenue from another team, eased by the significant public contribution--direct subsidies, tax breaks, giveaway of naming rights, override of zoning, inside deal on railyard development rights--that allowed arena construction.


BALDC Board Materials Aug. 8, 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.