Skip to main content

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

Official attendance for basketball
According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official attendance refers to tickets distributed, not gate count.

As I reported 4/24/14, a report  on traffic by Empire State Development, the New York state agency that oversees the arena and larger project, stated, "Actual attendance during the 2012-2013 season (including Playoffs) averaged approximately 14,974." Previously, a memo from transportation consultant Sam Schwartz suggested that gate count in that season was closer to 15,500.

Real gate count

According to the report from consultant Conventions Sport & Leisure (CSL; excerpt below), the Nets averaged approximately 14,900 fans per game over the first three years, which I calculate as about 13.2% less than announced attendance.

More dramatically, in the most recent season, "average attendance fell by 22% over the previous three-year average." That's a drop of 3,278, which works out to 11,622 fans. That 11,622 figure suggests 3,503 no-shows, or 23.2%, from the announced 15,125 figure.

(It's unclear whether CSL figures include playoff and pre-season games, but I believe they do, since such games were included for the Islanders.)

Reassuring potential bond buyers, the document does suggest the Barclays Center will meet revenue projections for the Nets, but "it will be important for the Arena that the Nets field a competitive team on the court into the future."

Indeed, though also bringing in unusual players like Jeremy Lin might expand the casual fan base, even if the team doesn't improve tremendously.

Attendance policies

I wrote in 2008 about the curious dichotomy between announced attendance and gate count for the then-New Jersey Nets. Tickets distributed sometimes vastly exceed actual attendance. Freebies do count as attendance if the people show up, because, after all, those fans typically spend money on concessions, another profit center for the arena.

It's not uncommon for professional sports to count tickets distributed as attendance. In a definitive 5/18/06 article headlined Mythinformation, the San Diego Union-Tribune's Mark Zeigler explained how attendance figures were skewed, and suggested that the National Basketball Association's policy is among the least transparent:
NBA: A strict leaguewide policy of announcing tickets distributed, including comps. It refuses to release turnstile counts.
NHL: Announces tickets distributed, but the difference between that and turnstile counts appears to be growing.

Islanders attendance

The New York Islanders, which played their first season at the Barclays Center, experienced a similar divergence between official attendance and actual gate count.

The Islanders averaged 13,626 fans for regular season home games, according to league figures, or 13,900 announced attendance overall, including three pre-season games and six playoff games, according to the CSL report.

(The Islanders had three low-attendance preseason games, one of which had an announced attendance of 7,046, with the other two lacking announced attendance. But all six playoff games sold out, at 15,795.)

But the report reveals that the team actually averaged 11,200 fans per game, which is 2,700 fewer people than announced, or 19.4%. Overall, 11,200 fans is 70.9% of arena capacity.

Prospects for the Islanders

As noted in the excerpt above, as previously reported in the New York Post and other outlets, the unusual financial arrangement is that the arena pays the Islanders an annual guarantee of $53.5 million (and climbing 1.5% a year) in exchange for ticket, advertising, sponsorship, and concession revenues--though the team keeps certain playoff revenue.

It is reasonable to expect attendance growth, the CSL report says, as the Islanders continue to field a competitive team and develop new fans. Indeed, per-game attendance grew over the past season.

However, a decline in attendance as a result of poor on-ice performance or other factors--the report doesn't mention how fans find the arena awkward for hockey, with bad sightlines--could impact revenue.

CSL notes reports that the Islanders are exploring moving to a new arena--which I think is a stretch, given the cost of construction. Note that the Barclays Center is still making money from the Islanders, despite the relatively low attendance:

And if the Islanders leave?

If the Islanders were to leave after the 2018 or 2019 seasons, the Barclays Center could leverage existing relationships to fill "a portion" of the lost 44 dates with concerts and other events. Of course they could; the question is what portion. 

The Preliminary Official Statement explains that, as described (in less precise detail) elsewhere, how, after the next season, AreanCo--the arena operating company--and the Islanders could renegotiate the 25-year license agreement:
If the parties are unable to reach an agreement on a modification to the NYI License Agreement, either party, through delivery of a notice no later than January 30, 2018 (an “Opt-Out Notice”), may elect to terminate the NYI License Agreement effective as of the conclusion of the fourth (4th) NHL season of the NYI License Agreement term (i.e., conclusion of the 2018-2019 NHL season); provided, however, that, in the event that an Opt-Out Notice is delivered, the Islanders shall also have the right to terminate the NYI License Agreement effective as of the conclusion of the third (3rd) NHL season of the NYI License Agreement term (i.e., conclusion of the 2017-2018 NHL season). 
In other words, the Islanders could be gone after three years. That seems unlikely. But the threat, as many agree, could be leverage for improvements, some of which Barclays Center has begun to make.

How many arena events per year?

In another section of the Preliminary Official Statement, it's revealed that the Barclays Center "averaged approximately 180 to 200 events each year since its opening in September 2012, which has increased to over 240 events with the addition of Islanders Home Games in 2015."

That's a significant different, and it suggests that the originally projected 225 events a year was a stretch.

The arena also might lose--or have to renegotiate--sponsorships that were predicated on a two-team venue.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…