Skip to main content

Before hearing on housing bonds Monday, a fact sheet on 535 Carlton tower (298 subsidized units)

There will be a public hearing on Monday, 11/17/14 on tax-exempt bonds for 535 Carlton, built at the corner of Carlton Avenue and Dean Street, the first tower to be built by the Greenland Forest City Partners joint venture (and the first under the name Pacific Park Brooklyn), with 298 subsidized apartments.

More of them are family-sized than the first tower but the configuration disproportionately emphasizes middle-income units. The amount of bonds, $73 million, is less than the $92 million sought for the larger B2 tower, which had half market-rate units.

The hearing, which also will cover applications for numerous other tax-exempt bond requests, will be at 11:30 a.m. in the main Conference Room of the New York City Housing Development Corporation (NYC HDC), 110 William Street, 10th Floor, in Manhattan. (It will also be webcast and on toll-free phone.)

The public is allowed to make comments and, while they surely are noted by staff, they do not--based on the experience with the first tower--make much of a difference. Groundbreaking is expected in December.

The fact sheet

The Pacific Park Brooklyn - 535 Carlton Fact Sheet sent to me by the New York City Housing Development Corporation (below) and also available at the hearing, summarizes the overall project and provides some details on the building, most of them already known. The fact sheet was almost certainly prepared by the developer.

The building will have 298 units for low-, moderate- and middle-income households; as noted in the chart at the bottom of the second page, half the units will go to households earning up to 165% of Area Median Income (AMI).

Given that current AMI is $83,900 for a family of four, 165% is $138,435. They'd pay nearly $3,000--and likely more when the building opens in the fall of 2016.

A couple of self-serving aspects deserve comment:
  • the project is not actually "in downtown Brooklyn," even Forest City describes it as "the dynamic intersection of Prospect Heights, Ft. Greene, Park Slope and Downtown Brooklyn," though it's more precisely Prospect Heights plus a bit of Park Slope--and certainly very close to Fort Greene and DTB
  • it will not contain an "8 acre public park" but rather publicly accessible open space
  • the rendering is flatteringly demure for an 18-story, 193-foot tower (note that 184 feet is supposed to be the maximum height of the last occupiable floor)
  • (they corrected a typo and revised the fact sheet that I published earlier this morning. It now shows the lowest-income band is 5%, not 50%)


More family-sized units

As I've written, the configuration, which overemphasizes better-off households, is a retreat from the promised allotment of subsidized units, but, compared to the first, stalled tower, there would be far more family-sized units: approximately 66 studios (20%), 129 one bedroom units (45%), 88 two bedroom units (30%) and 15 three bedroom units (5%).

NYC HDC confirmed that that configuration will be spread evenly throughout the building, rather than skewing the larger units--as in the first tower--to the upper affordable bands.

There will be approximately 9,610 sf of retail on the ground floor and numerous amenities, including a 24-hour doorman, fitness center, children’s play area, bike storage, resident lounge, and roof terrace. Laundry rooms with washer and dryer appliances to be located on each floor.

Financing plan--less bonding thatn first tower

There's no overall price tag for the building, but, as noted in the fact sheet, it may include up to $73 million in Bonds, as well as Low Income Housing Tax Credits, HDC Second Mortgage & Developer Equity.

That second mortgage, according to the document below, would be $11,785,000--the source of Mayor Bill de Blasio's not-quite-credible claim that the city is getting twice as much affordable housing for the same allotment.

That said, it appears that NYC HDC is allotting a smaller amount of its limited bonding capacity--not a direct subsidy but a finite resource--to this tower, given that the first tower got $92 million for 363 total units, 181 of them subsidized. It's not quite an apples-to-apples comparison, because half the affordable units in this new tower are too expensive to get that second mortgage and thus closer to market rates.

HDC Letter, B14, Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.