Skip to main content

In lawsuit over promised union jobs/careers, FCR CEO Gilmartin also proves slippery in deposition

Several people reading my coverage of the lawsuit filed against Forest City Ratner and its community partner Brooklyn United for Innovative Local Development (BUILD) commented that developer Bruce Ratner seemed particularly adept at not saying much.

For example, Ratner was asked, in his deposition, if he had “discussions with your staff” about BUILD CEO James Caldwell’s promises of union jobs and careers to those in the pre-apprenticeship training program, or PATP. (Some 20 of the 36 trainees are plaintiffs, seeking compensation for the careers they didn't get and the work they say they did during training.)

“I have had them subsequent,” he answered. “I don’t remember that period of time that I did. I don’t remember that I did. Or didn’t, frankly. But I don’t know.”

What about Ratner's successor?

Though I didn't focus on the testimony of his successor as CEO, MaryAnne Gilmartin, she too proved somewhat slippery, at least at one key point in her deposition.

The excerpt from her deposition is brief--full depositions are not available--but it concentrates on whether and how the trainees were told the PATP would not lead to a union apprenticeship, as Caldwell promised (and some documents suggest), but instead to another, already-established PATP.

(As I wrote, that would mean that BUILD's program more accurately should have been called a pre-pre-apprenticeship training program.)
Q. And was that path, when I talk about path, I'm talking about through the three programs that you mentioned, Construction Skills 2000, Helmets to Hardhats and NEW, was that path to possible -- to hopeful union membership, was that communicated to BUILD?
A. I believe so.
Q. And how was it communicated to BUILD?
A. I'm thinking meetings and correspondence, both. Conversations. 
It's unclear from the deposition what time frame is being referenced.

Note that, in contrast with Gilmartin's recollection, one of her deputies, Jane Marshall, wrote to one of her deputies, Sonya Covington, on 10/5/10, well after the PATP had begun, "Where is it explicitly stated either in emails or other documents that they HAD to go through union programs? We need documentation in ADDITION to plain fact because these people are snakes.”

“Always been discussion,” Covington responded. Marshall asked her to send documentation to Gilmartin because “with this group, and any CBA group, documentation is the key.”

More from Gilmartin

The plaintiffs' attorneys tried to get some clarity from Gilmartin.
Q. Did you ever get -- first of all, when you're talking about documenting the work that we have accomplished this past year, are you talking about the work to get to the path of those three programs, is that what you're referring to?
A. I think so.
Q. And when you sent this -- when you forwarded it to Sonya [Covington], was Sonya ever able to provide you with documentation or papering that you were saying --
A. Look, we all knew that we made it clear --
Q. -- didn't exist?
A. Over and over and over again in meetings and conversations and even written word. But it's just one of these hypercommunication things that I always felt like for good measure, just say it over and over again. You know, tattoo it on your own forehead, if you have to. It's just one of those things where it probably can't be said enough, because of this issue of communication or lack of a sort of appreciation or sophistication where we're on a path, we're on a path, we're on a path, everybody's on the boat, and you find out that --
Q. And again, you're referring --
MR. WEINBERGER [defense attorney]: Did you finish?
Q. Did you finish? Go ahead.
A. I just want to say that -- yeah, I'm finished.
Q. And the path that you're talking about, again, just to clarify the path that you said over and over again was the path that was going to go through these three programs? That was made clear to them over and over again?
A. Well, from the point that we created that path. Because the getting to the path we've sat here and picked apart for the last few hours that we were on a road to getting to a path. And got on that path.
Q. That was sometime in May when Bob Sanna was able to get the 200 slots?
A. That was a definitive milestone in that, yes.
Gilmartin was asked when it was made clear to BUILD that the PATP would not lead to union apprenticeships. But her response--"That was a definitive milestone in that, yes"--leaves some wiggle room.

The court record, as I wrote, is convoluted, but it's odd that, if Forest City were truly certain this would not lead to apprenticeships, the company chose to fund not just merely "life skills" training but also construction skills. Could it be that they were "humoring" BUILD to keep the non-profit's public posture of support?

Looking for evidence?

The questioning continued:
Q. Okay.
A. And this is October.
Q. Okay. All right. Do you know if Sonya was ever able to come up with evidence that you were indicating that you couldn't -- you were asking can we produce --
A. Let me make it clear, my statements were not intended to produce evidence, because I knew what we were doing. We were all there. So it wasn’t like, this was almost like rhetorical, you see. I wasn't looking for somebody to show me a piece of paper because we were living it. It wasn't that kind of a thing. It was more here we are, in October, and there is a bit of amnesia going on.
Q. Tell me about amnesia. Is this amnesia from Mr. Caldwell?
A. Yes.
Q. And what was it that he said in this email that was amnesia?
A. That there would be no construction jobs for the BUILD training students upon completion of the program.
Q. And so that was, why was that amnesia?
A. Do I have to tell you? I mean, we just got through saying what was supposed to happen. It was another important step to getting there. And I also think I pointed out the hyper-concern about creating expectations that nobody's ever guaranteed a job anyway. This is about opportunity. So getting the opportunity to get the job. That’s the point.
Q. Okay.
A. So this so misses the point, that it's frustrating.
Q. Do you have any reason to believe that he is not being truthful in what he's writing to you, that he believes something else but is saying this?
A. I don't think he's a detail man on these things. I think for him it was really not about how you get there. He just wanted to be successful in delivering for the people he promised things to. And I think that it's really just about the shortcuts that he would take generally in thinking, in processing information, than in execution. Some people just don't focus on details.
(Emphasis added)

She wasn't looking for a piece of paper, but Marshall sure was.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.