Skip to main content

After costly season and flurry of change, Brooklyn Nets rebuild at somewhat lesser cost. The Boston legacy is down to (maybe) Garnett

Always remember: basketball, like the other pro sports so many people put their hearts into, is a business.

So this advertisement from last year, featuring the three players--two of them aging stars--the Brooklyn Nets got from the Boston Celtics, is already way out of date.

Jason Terry, on the right, got traded last February, after an ineffective few months. Kevin Garnett, in the center, is the oldest, and it's not clear if he's returning after a season in which he struggled beyond shorter stints.

And Paul Pierce, on the left, after a strong year, decided to join the Washington Wizards when the Nets decided to be more conservative about spending.  A tweet from NetsDaily's Bob Windrem (aka NetIncome):
As the New York Post's Tim Bontemps reported, in Here’s the Truth: Paul Pierce signs with Wizards:
Paul Pierce agreed to sign a two-year deal with the Wizards worth $11 million, league sources confirmed to The Post.
...The Nets had the chance to match the offer to Pierce, sources said, but passed, determining the luxury tax burden — which would have been in excess of $20 million — too steep a price to pay after the franchise shelled out roughly $193 million in combined payroll and luxury tax commitments for the 2013-14 season...
The move means the Nets, once they complete the expected signings of 2011 second round pick Bojan Bogdanovic and Markel Brown — the first of the team’s three second round picks in last month’s draft — will have committed more than $120 million in payroll and luxury tax commitments to 13 players for their 2014-15 roster.
...Pierce’s decision caps a crazy two weeks for the franchise, which began when The Post first reported Jason Kidd had been granted permission to speak with the Milwaukee Bucks about becoming their head coach after a failed power play to be placed over general manager Billy King atop the team’s basketball operations department.
Since then, Kidd has left for Milwaukee and the Nets have hired Lionel Hollins to replace him, traded for Jarrett Jack and Sergey Karasev, will soon have officially agreed to terms with Bogdanovic and now have seen Pierce move on.
And that means, according to NetsDaily's quotation of announcer Ian Eagle: Brooklyn Nets may be headed back to a "core" of Deron Williams, Brook Lopez and Joe Johnson.

It's about money

The Nets are also saving money, at least compared to last year. And the team--principal owner Mikhail Prokhorov, along with his brain trust--spent big on a gamble at short term success.

In What NBA teams spent the most money per win this season?, the Brooklyn Game's Devin Kharpertian described the Nets as the least cost-effective team in the league, with the San Antonio Spurs the most:
With the latest luxury tax information, we've learned that the Brooklyn Nets spent a ridiculous amount of money this season, and it added up to 44 wins and a second-round exit. But just how much were those wins -- and that payroll -- worth?
The Nets spent nearly $4 million per win with the playoffs included.



Of course the value of the team continues to skyrocket, so in the long run the spending may matter less.

New perspective

Wrote Kharpertian:
So signing Pierce to a deal worth $5 million would've actually cost them about $22 million this season, or about the same salary LeBron James is getting from the Cleveland Cavaliers. Then it would've put them in definite repeater tax territory in the next year. Given that LeBron is a four-time MVP and dropped 49 points on Pierce's head in the playoffs, that's not smart spending no matter how you look at it.
But that fact right there -- that it's smart spending for the Nets not to make the deal -- is kind of the point. This is a telling moment in Nets history: the days of spending for the sake of spending are over. The mantra of "spend if it adds talent, regardless of cost" did not apply.
...But Pierce is gone, and ultimately [GM] Billy King will be judged on what it cost to bring him here in the first place for just one season. The facts won't go away no matter how many times you try to bury them with the BrooklyKnight: the Nets traded away three future unprotected(!) first-round picks, plus the option to swap a fourth first-round pick, for the luxury of adding Pierce for one year and a rapidly aging Garnett for two, falsely presuming they would keep Pierce around. That's an incredible amount of assets gone on the rickety chance that they could develop a championship team around those two guys, an idea that died in the second round of the playoffs and was buried for good today. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.