Skip to main content

Judge, ruling from bench, dismisses lawsuit aiming to block DOB's approval of modular construction

For a little while, it looked like state Supreme Court Justice Eileen Rakower was sympathetic to the argument that construction of modules for Atlantic Yards was less like a building component such as a dishwasher and more like a building itself--and thus would require the presence of licensed plumbing contractors and fire suppression contractors, who had sued the New York City Department of Buildings (DOB).

However, after a 70-minute hearing today at a small courtroom at 80 Centre Street in Lower Manhattan, Rakower swiftly dismissed the suit, ruling from the bench, "I also find that DOB did not exceed its mandate in permitting the manufacture of these systems."

That wasn't precisely on point, since she was using "permitting the manufacture of these systems" as a shorthand for several issues aired in the legal papers and oral argument, and perhaps will be discussed in her forthcoming written opinion.

One of those issues: why, as the judge's ruling indicated, is a several-ton factory manufactured module--one of the 930 components of a 363-unit, 32-story tower--more like a dishwasher than a building?

Brett Jaffe, representing the Plumbing Foundation and the Mechanical Contractors Associations, pointed out at the start that the suit was not just about B2, Forest City Ratner's under-construction Atlantic Yards modular tower, but any future modular construction, including commercial buildings and hospitals.

He added that the petitioners support modular construction, but only as long as it's in compliance with the construction Code. To a developer like Forest City, cross-trained workers in the factory cost much less than licensed specialists.

Petitioners' case

Jaffe first had to argue that the petitioners deserved standing, that they had an interest at stake, and that no one else could sue DOB to ensure a safe process. (The DOB argued no, suggesting that neighbors and future tower residents might have standing, but the judge granted standing to the petitioners moments before she dismissed the suit.)

Jaffe suggested that, because of strict liability, his clients, after they do the hook-ups at the job site, "they'll have no control of anything that went into it," and thus could suffer a severe injury.

"We're going to hear the word 'deference' a lot," Jaffe said regarding the defense strategy, which argued that the court should defer to agency discretion as long as the DOB acted "rationally," a low bar.

"Not here, Your Honor," he continued. "Not when we are talking about a pure question of statutory interpretation." If the DOB prefers a different regulatory scheme, he said, "they could go to City Council."

Rakower asked about a Council hearing this past January in which some of the issues were raised, and whether the hearing produced any result.

"Not a result," Jaffe said, "and nothing can be taken from that." He said some hearing testimony was appended to show it's "not some sort of proprietary issue" and to show how Forest City Ratner and the DOB typically use the term "plumbing" in colloquial discourse. "The only time they stopped calling it plumbing was when we sued."

Rakower asked why the third cohort of licensed trades--electricians--hadn't sued. Jaffe said his understanding is that there were some differences in the Code, but agreed the policy considerations were the same.

He noted that, if the plumbing and fire suppression work were done on site, it would have to be done by licensed contractors. "They say, when you move from the job site to the factory, magically, the requirement falls away."

Language at issue

He took aim at the DOB's interpretation of statutory language regarding plumbing, reading "in connection with" as "to connect to." With a traditional building, he noted, the system isn't connected to the water supply until the end.

The second DOB argument, he noted, is that the module isn't a building.

The judge noted that there's an exception for modular buildings like mobile homes. That, said Jaffe, is a completed structure, while "this is a 32-story building."

He noted that Forest City must comply with technical requirements of the code regarding materials and process, but not who's doing the work.

Rakower asked if there's a way--presumably for Jaffe's clients--to test the modules for quality before they're brought onto the site. "I don't think there is," Jaffe said.

"You make a good point," the judge said. "If they're going to be strictly liable, they want to know it's  good product."

Jaffe added that, as a matter of common sense, a module is not akin to a Jacuzzi, since the latter is among "listed items" that are produced according to national standards.

"What we're talking about here is an entire bespoke plumbing system for a building," he declared.

DOB defense

Mark Muschenheim, representing the DOB, said the petitioners' analysis was faulty, because a licensed plumber "is obviously not responsible for a defective Jacuzzi."

That argument left unresolved the question about whether it was possible to distinguish between defective plumbing work done at the factory and that done at the site, and whether the plumbers at the site would be liable.

"Location matters," he said, noting that the contracting work must be done in a building. And uninstalled items, he said, are not structures.

The applicable provisions are clear, he said, and if not should be entitled to deference.

Rakower asked a practical question: would the systems in the finished building be tested each year?

Muschenheim, after consulting an associate, said fire suppression systems were tested, but was unsure of the frequency.

Forest City's case

Bradley Ruskin, representing Forest City affiliates--the modular factory and the owners of B2--pointed to "unproved and unprovable allegations" of Forest City's intervention into the process after meeting with DOB.

Rakower said that played no role.

(No one made a big deal about how DOB issued a draft Bulletin requiring licensed plumbing and fire suppression work at the modular factory, then withdrew it.)

The issue, the judge said, is whether modules should be considered the same way as if constructed on site.

DOB's role, Ruskin said, is not to regulate construction of components in places like "Kansas" but rather "where it gets put together" and "connected to the water system," at the building site.

Rebuttal, response, and ruling

In rebuttal, Jaffe said the latter interpretation doesn't make sense: "It means plumbing work isn't plumbing work until its connected to the water supply. That's never been the approach before."

He said terms used by the DOB regarding a building--"stand on its own" and "viable for use and occupancy"--were not found in the Code.

Given a chance to respond, Ruskin said the Code didn't cover a range of systems constructed offsite, including water reclamation systems and firepumps.

But those, said Rakower, were built to a particular standard.

"As is the case here," replied Ruskin.

"The interesting thing about a modular building," mused Rakower, "is you're manufacturing a system."

At that point, she ruled that the petitioners had standing and, in once more sentence, dismissed the case: "I also find that DOB did not exceed its mandate in permitting the manufacture of these systems."

It's unclear whether the petitioners will appeal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.