Skip to main content

At last Congressional hearing on EB-5, little skepticism, some evasion, calls for streamlining program

Given the upcoming Senate Judiciary Committee hearing December 7 on the EB-5 investment immigration program, it's worth a look back at a House hearing 9/14/11 held by the Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement.

Unsurprisingly, the hearing, titled "The Investor Visa Program: Key to Creating American Jobs"  (video), featured little skepticism about the program and some fudging from witnesses. One evaded the fundamental reason why developers and entrepreneurs like EB-5: foreign investors are willing to accept little return in exchange for green cards. (Hence the support for Atlantic Yards.)

Statements by Representatives

In a statement, Subcommittee Chairman Elton Gallegly (R-CA), led off with enthusiasm:
Almost 10,000 green cards a year are available through the investor visa program for foreign businessmen who invest in American businesses and create jobs for American workers. If investors and their families utilized all these visas, and each investor created the 10 jobs called for by the program, tens of thousands of jobs a year would be created. That is something I’m sure all of us could all rally around.
And yet, the investor visa program is presently underutilized. DHS issued only 749 investor visas in 2006, rising to 2,480 in 2010. The program has the potential to be a far larger job creator.
The recent growth we have seen in the investor visa program has come from the regional center pilot program. A regional center pools investments in defined economic zones. The establishment of a regional center may be based on general predictions concerning the kinds of commercial enterprises that will receive capital, the jobs that will be created directly or indirectly as a result of such capital investments, and the other positive economic effects such investments will have. Numerous regional centers exist in my state of California.
The regional center program expires in a year. We will examine today its level of success in generating jobs, the merits of a reauthorization and the appropriate length of a reauthorization.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), said, "This program seems like a no-brainer, but it is severely underutilized." She noted uncertainty that the regional center program would be renewed, and a lack of consistency by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a subsidiary of DHS, in adjudicating EB-5 petitions.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), who chairs the overall committee, stated that the program plays a part in the number one job of Congress, "to create jobs." He acknowledged a dollop of concern about fraud:
Just as in any visa program, there is the potential for fraud in the investor visa program. We have to ensure, both for the sake of the American people and potential foreign investors, that regional centers operate at the highest levels of professionalism and integrity. The business plans and promotional materials that regional centers produce should meet the same standards as if they were to be submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Supportive testimony from Dallas

In a statement, Daniel J. Healy, CEO of Civitas Capital Group, a boutique asset management firm based in Dallas, described how his firm collaborated with the city of Dallas to set up the City of Dallas Regional Center, which, in 17 months, "has committed to six high-quality investments totaling $91 million," from 182 foreign nationals who will create at least 1,820 new jobs.

He noted how, in 2008, there were perhaps 35 Regional Centers but as of September there were180 in 36 states--what he called "success stories like the CDRC’s all over the United States."

Given the growth of the program--an expected 3,200 petitions in fiscal 2011, "it is clear that the annual allocation of 10,000 EB-5 visas will soon become a constraint on the program’s ability to create more jobs for U.S. workers and bolster local economic development." After all, each petition likely requires three visas, one for the primary investor and also two dependents.

Healy recommended that the USCIS speed processing times--currently six months each for both processing Regional Center applications and individual investor petitions. He applauded news that  USCIS was "hiring a large number of adjudicators, economists and other personnel in order to expand the agency’s capacity and bring processing times down," as well as offering “premium processing” for a fee.

Supportive testimony from Vermont

In his statement, Bill Stenger, President of Jay Peak Resort, Jay, VT, called the EB-5 Program "a win-win-win program for all involved," saying his firm gained access to equity capital to create needed facilities and jobs, while the foreign investor gets the green card

He recommended that Congress make this program permanent to make planning more effective, and USCIS should strive for efficiency and predictability.

Gallegly asked Stenger, "Where would you be without EB-5?"

Stenger said the resort would be confined to winter operation only, as "equity capital is just not available."

Q&A: buying their way in?

"How do you respond to those who that claim that the investor visa program simply allows aliens to buy green cards?" asked Gallegly.

Stenger gave a roundabout answer: "What I see in our investors, and I think in all of the quality programs in the country, you see people who are interested in being in this country, they have the capacity to invest in a project that's job-creating. Yes, they're getting a preference, but they're bringing something that we desperately need: we need equity capital. You asked the question earlier: what would we be if we didn't have access to this? The banking community is just not available to us in the manner that we'd like it to be. And that's not just true at Jay Peak, that's true for small business throughout this country. So, when our investors come, they bring their capital, they bring their good educations, many of them invest in other communities that they live in. It's truly a win-win-win situation, in that they bring capital, they bring their education, they bring their family, they bring their love of this country, and their desire to be here, and it's a great economic benefit, and it creates jobs everywhere along the way."

He wasn't pressed on it.

Q&A: fraud

Gallegly asked Healy, "From your perspective, do you see any fraud or dubious investment vehicles in the regional center program?"

"From my perspective, no, I don't regularly see fraud or dubious investments," responded Healy. "I have seen--I think what's important to keep in mind, in any market, there's a range of investments... our program... has a particular approach... some of my competitors I would invest in, some I would not. In terms of fraud or abuse, I really don't see that. We see a great number of investment opportunities--we try hard to monitor our competition... But where I have seen problems is not really in people entering the market or attempting to game the system, it's much more on the regulatory and adjudication side."

(Even supporters of the program acknowledge fraud; check the "EB-5 Fraud" tag at

Q&A: rival programs

What about competition from Canadian and Australian immigration programs?

It's sometimes quite stiff, Healy said. "Very recently, the Canadian program doubled the required investment... There's no question that when investors in other countries are considering immigrating, they look at other options. One of the challenges we face at regional center, is the U.S. remains the gold standard, [but] the process... is arduous, time consuming and expensive."

Q&A: why no local investors?

Smith asked, "Why is it we can't find more American investors to participate in these kinds of programs?"

Stenger responded by fudging the issue, that foreign investors are willing to accept little return in exchange for green cards.

"Our particualr program is very attractive to EB-5 candidates around the world. And we have reached out to various parts of the world," he said. "There's an investment market, there is interest in coming to this country, there's a tremendous amount of capital that's looking to be part of programs in the United States. So we have reached out to various parts of the world to welcome investors to the United States. The return on investment is competitive. To reach out to U.S. investors, we have other investments that U.S. investors can participate in. This particular EB-5 program is focused on foreign investors who have capital, who have a good background and are capable of investing and making job-creation occur in rural areas such as ours. So the program is specifically for the foreign investor, bringing capital, creating jobs, in rural high unemployment area such as ours, and that's where we have focused, and we're seeing substantive results."

Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA) asked, why a regional center was needed to attract foreign investors when presumably local investors are available.

Healy was more candid than Stenger, "There are areas of Dallas that are underserved for years," he said. "While the investment climate in Texas indeed strong, there are always areas that are underserved and that, in particular, EB-5 capital can facilitate transactions occurring... because the capital can be much lower cost and more flexible than traditional investment capital or bank financing."

Q&A: improving the program

Smith asked, "How would you suggest we improve the program... How can we prevent individuals from gaming the system, how can we better protect investors?"

Healy responded, "I think that the way I would suggest that most of the regional centers that are operating now are very high quality and are not attempting to do anything that would be gaming the system. But I think that in order to ensure that doesn't occur, all of the best practices suggested by IIUSA [Association to Invest in the USA], which include complying with and being subject to the regulation of the SEC, with respect to unregistered securities , to the extend that these regional center projects are structured as limited partnerships or other forms of unregistered securities would be appropriate. My background is in institutional investments. I was chief compliance officer at a broker dealer. We are approaching the threshold for being required to register as an investment advisor with the SEC. This is not new to us. For people who are operating at a high quality level, this is not going to be a [problem]."

The Ombudsman's report

USCIS, in its Ombudsman's Annual Report 2011, issued 6/29/11, indicated concerns that "inconsistent administration of the EB-5 program is undermining confidence in the program and, ultimately decreasing the job growth potential that it was designed to create."

The Ombudsman recommended implementation of reforms and cited concerns about "reportedly inappropriate or unduly burdensome RFEs connected with employment-based applications and petitions."


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…