Skip to main content

ESDC CEO Adams, asked about AY at third Senate Committee, calls arena the project's "core," fully supports project, expresses optimism about buildout

This updates and corrects my coverage of last week's set of state Senate hearings on the nomination of Kenneth Adams as President and CEO of the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC).

I mentioned two committee hearings on 4/5/11, but missed another, that involving the Corporations, Authorities and Commissions Committee. And at that hearing, unlike the other two, Adams was asked briefly about Atlantic Yards.

Adams expressed optimism that the delayed project would proceed, spoke vaguely about ensuring community voices would be heard, and, when asked about eminent domain, changed the subject to explain how, with incentives for projects smaller than Atlantic Yards, the state does better to ensure that promised results be delivered before benefits are paid out.

He described Atlantic Yards as a project that his agency fully supports. No one challenged him on how such support, manifested in contracts like the Development Agreement that give the developer a long leash, can be harmonized with incentives that ensure promised results are delivered.

Questions from Perkins

At 8:58, state Senator Bill Perkins (D-Harlem), who, when the Democrats controlled the Senate held a hearing on Atlantic Yards and another on eminent domain reform, brought up both issues.

He pointed to a recent Wall Street Journal article on developer Forest City Ratner and Atlantic Yards, "and how that project, which was heralded as a great opportunity for some important development, very controversial... doesn't seem to be quite getting there."

"So I'm wondering, what is your take on that situation--how do we avoid that kind of debacle, that it's ultimately turned out to be, at least as it's been reported in recent news articles?" Perkins asked.



Adams: arena, "core," moving forward

"I think with respect to Atlantic Yards, I'm new to this obviously," Adams responded. "But it is my sense that the core of the project, the arena, is certainly moving forward. I actually live near the project site and I've seen the construction. So I think the essence of that project--which, this agency, we fully support--is still moving forward. That's not to say it doesn't have its challenges, as you mention."

Given that the project benefits (tax revenue, open space, blight removal, new railyard) have been premised on much more than the arena, it's dubious to refer to the Barclays Center as the "core" of the project, and Perkins later called him on it.

Listening to the community

Adams then turned pensive. "Y'know, one thing that I think could make a difference in projects of that scale is a renewed commitment, which I'm certainly prepared to make, to really listening to the communities affected by large-scale projects. Atlantic Yards is a $6 billion project--it's a very, very big project... as you well know, Senator."

Either Adams is a little fuzzy on the detail or he's privy to details on cost inflation; officially, Atlantic Yards is a $4.9 billion project.

"And I know," Adams added, "because I just coincidentally live within walking district of the project site, I know many of the leaders of community groups that feel... that they haven't always been heard."

"I wasn't engaged--I wasn't involved, I don't know if it's right or wrong"--presumably he was referring to the criticism--"but the point is, as an agency, as an interface between a private sector developer and a major initiative, in this case Downtown Brooklyn but we have other projects like this across the state, it's our job to make sure that the voices of the community are heard and that there's appropriate engagement and discussion of all the aspects of the project."

That's palliative talk, but Adams didn't get to the issue: does the ESDC support any new governance structure to oversee the project and institutionalize community voices?

Beyond the arena

Perkins, rather than follow up on governance, cordially corrected the nominee. "The heart of the project may have been the arena, but the scale of the project was so substantial that the arena, relatively speaking, was insignificant," he said.

"So I'm concerned because--can we accept that as a success if the arena goes up and the rest of the project does not materialize?" asked Perkins, who noted that people were displaced and forced to sell their property, and "promises were made for employment."

That, he said, has left some people "very cynical about the project, because it appears that the only promise to be kept will be that of the basketball arena. The affordable housing, the employment opportunities, the other economic opportunities for small businesses--those seem to be sort of gone by the wayside."

Adams: "eternal optimist"

Adams replied, "I just want to quickly respond that--and, as my colleagues get to know me, they know I'm the eternal optimist--so I believe there are aspects of Atlantic Yards that will be fully built out beyond the arena. In fact, it's been reported to me that the first of the housing--the affordable housing projects--will break ground later this year."

Note that the first affordable housing tower has steadily been postponed, so the report to Adams should be taken with some skepticism. He was not asked about the developer's proposal--risky and innovative--to save money via modular construction at an untested height.

ESDC: "very supportive"

"Undoubtedly, there are aspects, because of the slowdown in the economy and the national recession, big projects like this sometimes get slowed down," Adams continued, "but again, the optimist in me says, over time the goals of the project will be fulfilled. It will probably take longer than what was originally proposed, but the elements are there, we're going to be very supportive."

What does "very supportive" mean? If the state relaxes deadlines, offers more subsidies, or encourages dubious efforts like raising money via the EB-5 program, that suggests the ESDC aims to ensure Forest City Ratner's bottom line ahead of protecting the public trust.

"I'll be optimistic and say to you that I think most if not all of that plan will eventually be built out, it just may take longer, but the communities affected should still get the benefits that they've been promised," Adams said.

But the pace of benefits affects their value; for example, 2250 subsidized housing units over ten years is very different than the same number delivered over 20 or 30 years.

Eminent domain

Perkins moved on to a related issue, "It's about 10 years since the Kelo case"--he chuckled--"and it turns out that community went through the eminent domain process and property was taken and, guess what, nothing has been done."

(The Supreme Court's Kelo v. New London decision came in 2005, but the case began years earlier.)

Noting that Adams is in a position to restore community confidence, Perkins asked how he could "assure folks... that the kind of Kelo situation, ten years later, the kind of situation we're seeing at Atlantic Yards" would be dealt with.

Adams responded, "I think the short answer would be that we have to be very careful when we deploy the special tools that we have as an agency, the tools that you're mentioning, and deploy them in ways where we are guaranteed that, as they are used, the results that have been promised will be fulfilled."

Guaranteed results?

Adams then pivoted to address a related but different subject: "As an example, most of our new--and not for the bigger projects like Atlantic Yards, but things like our Excelsior [jobs] program and other tax credits and benefits--almost all of what we do in terms of economic development tools, require that the company or organization receiving those meet certain milestones in their project before a check is cut. Rarely do we actually do something upfront. So the more we can put those controls in place in the projects that we're supporting, the more we guarantee that the promised result is delivered before the benefit is paid out. And more and more, our programs are structured that way, to protect taxpayers, frankly, and to protect affected communities."

Such controls, of course, were not attached to the use of eminent domain for Atlantic Yards. And, as written in the Development Agreement, the penalties for delays and non-performance are relatively gentle, and kick in late.

Perkins thanked Adams and said he was looking forward to working with him, especially on reform of eminent domain.

"I think that is a very sensitive area that undermines the credibility of government," Perkins said, as people believe such tools don't benefit them but rather special interests.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…