Skip to main content

The dialogue (imagined) behind yesterday's court non-drama; what if someone challenged Justice Friedman on the Development Agreement?

I wasn't privy to the discussions among lawyers yesterday before state Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman, so I don't think this was the discussion that led to the lifting of a request for a stay on project construction.

I suspect the discussion was far more limited and politic.

But this is what might have happened had there been a law clerk in the room raising inconvenient arguments.

Dramatis personae include:
  • State Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman (MF)
  • Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn attorney Jeff Baker (JBa)
  • BrooklynSpeaks attorney Al Butzel (AB)
  • Empire State Development Corporation Phil Karmel (PK)
  • Forest City Ratner attorney Jeffrey Braun (JBr)
  • Friedman's imaginary, impudent law clerk (LC)
MF: OK, so you asked for a stay--

JBa: Right.

MF: Until they completed a response and they--

PK: Did just that. We submitted it. AKRF works very fast.

AB: We just think it's vastly inadequate. They completely ignored the real impacts of 25 years of construction.

JBa: Not to mention that the meeting was illegal. That executive session--

JBr: They haven't submitted any papers on that.

MF: Don't you realize, I can only decide the case before me. I ordered them to deliver findings and they did.

JBa: Did you read those findings?

MF: It's not the court's job to evaluate those findings. I'm not an environmental analyst.

PK: It's the court's job to determine whether the agency acted rationally. We submit we did.

AB: Well, we submit that the agency does not deserve standard deference. Look at the record.

JBa: Did you watch the board meeting? You really need to have been there.

JBr: It should be pointed out that Mr. Baker's office is in Albany.

JBa: OK, I watched the webcast. And I distinctly heard this board member use the term "rubber stamp"--

MF: Gentlemen. Gentlemen. Do you really think I'm going to stop construction of a billion-dollar basketball arena just because you disagree about the impacts of a parking lot that will linger 25 years--and you haven't briefed it fully?

JBa: That's not--

AB: --the only thing.

MF: You need a little more meat on the record. You can file a supplemental petition next month, and we'll proceed from there. For now, please work on a stipulation. We'll announce that in open court.

The attorneys exit. The court session ensues. The parties leave.

LC: Judge, you really didn't have any choice, right?

MF: None whatsoever. The law in New York is the law. If they want the law changed, they should go to the legislature. Lotsa luck.

LC: But, really, judge, wasn't it kind of your fault? In court last January, when it mattered, the ESDC kept talking about this Development Agreement they'd signed that would ensure the project would get done in ten years, but it wasn't available.

MF: True.

LC: And then it emerged a week later, and the penalties were pretty weak. Baker and Butzel asked that you get it into the record and--

MF: I said no. And, in my decision in March, I said the ten-year timetable was rational, but barely.

LC: And then they filed for reargument, and there was finally an oral argument in late June and a decision last month. Meanwhile, Forest City broke ground on the arena, and made significant progress on excavation and even erecting steel.

MF: What can I say--the judicial process takes time.

LC: In your decision November 9, you admitted it was a "misapprehension" on your part to not let in the Development Agreement back in the winter.

MF: If I made a mistake, they're not going to push me. The only people who can tell me I made a mistake serve on the Appellate Division.

LC: But if you'd ruled differently in March Forest City might not have been able to draw down the bond proceeds and construct the arena.

MF: That's what the petitioners say. The briefs on this seem to clash.

LC: Still, the ESDC gets rewarded for its willingness to withhold the Development Agreement, and Forest City Ratner benefits too. Then, when the ESDC finally complies last week and makes findings on the 25-year buildout, the report's not available until after the time for public comment.

MF: It's not pretty, but that hasn't been fully briefed. My job is to approach the next set of briefs with an open mind.

LC: I'm beginning to think Mr. Butzel has a point. He says Atlantic Yards, "though wrapped in ESDC's gauze, is clearly a private development project proposed and being implemented by a private for-profit developer." Didn't you read that law review article about "judicial deference to unaccountable agencies"?

MF: C'mon, I already criticized the ESDC for "what appears to be yet another failure of transparency." Has any elected official--beyond Sen. Bill Perkins--said as much regarding the ESDC's performance with Atlantic Yards? Is anyone going to reform this agency? I rest my case.

LC: OK, let's have lunch.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

So, Forest City has some property subject to the future Gowanus rezoning

Writing yesterday, MAP: Who Owns All the Property Along the Gowanus Canal, DNAinfo's Leslie Albrecht lays out the positioning of various real estate players along the Gowanus Canal, a Superfund site:
As the city considers whether to rezone Gowanus and, perhaps, morph the gritty low-rise industrial area into a hot new neighborhood of residential towers (albeit at a fraction of the height of Manhattan's supertall buildings), DNAinfo reviewed property records along the canal to find out who stands to benefit most from the changes.
Investors have poured at least $440 million into buying land on the polluted waterway and more than a third of the properties have changed hands in the past decade, according to an examination of records for the nearly 130 properties along the 1.8-mile canal. While the single largest landowner is developer Property Markets Group, other landowners include Kushner Companies, Alloy Development, Two Trees, and Forest City New York.

Forest City's plans unc…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…