Skip to main content

When AY GPP was "released" in July 2006, was that preliminary approval?

Yesterday, I questioned Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn's contention that the Atlantic Yards arena wouldn't be grandfathered in under a new Internal Revenue Service rule regarding tax-exempt bonds.

I still question that contention, but additional evidence suggests that, however much the project received "preliminary approval," the public sure didn't know it.

The grandfather clause

To grandfather in a project, the rule requires a governmental entity to have taken "official action evidencing its preliminary approval of the project before October 19, 2006."

While the Modified General Project Plan for Atlantic Yards was formally approved in December 2006 by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), a slightly different version, the General Project Plan (GPP), had been "adopted" (according to an agency press release) by the ESDC on July 18, 2006.

Though that ESDC board action in July was likely cursory, the IRS rule still seems tailored to comments filed by the city and state regarding the definition of "preliminary approval." Thus I (and most others) concluded that the ESDC's "adoption" of the GPP qualifies as "preliminary approval" under the regulation.

Even less deliberation

However, there's another indication that the ESDC's action was even less deliberative than adoption.

Developer Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards web site does not use the term "approval" to describe the action at that July ESDC board meeting.

It does not use the term "adopted."

It uses the term "released," adding that the ESDC's action "formally started the public review process."

In other words, the board's action was a starting point of sorts--not the beginning of the agency's involvement, but the beginning of the public review. Writing in this blog on 7/19/06, I described the main action of the day as the "release" of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.

The New York Times's coverage that day used "release":
The report’s release sets into motion a public comment period. The project faces a final vote by the development corporation’s board this fall, and if it is approved, it will face a vote by the state Public Authorities Control Board.

The IRS may well consider that "preliminary approval." But the public sure didn't know it.

From the official AY web site

The official Atlantic Yards web site has a page on the Public Process (click on graphic to enlarge):
Atlantic Yards was approved through an extensive environmental review pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The project received its final approvals in December 2006. Demolition and preparatory work has been under way at the project site since February 2007.

Important Dates in the Public Approval Process

On December 20, 2006, the PACB unanimously approved the Atlantic Yards development, marking the culmination of a years-long planning and public approval process.

On December 8, 2006, the ESDC Board of Directors gave final approval to the FEIS and the General Project Plan (GPP). The development was referred to the Public Authorities Control Board (PACB).

On November 27, 2006, the ESDC Board of Directors certified the Amended and Corrected FEIS, which addresses a number of comments inadvertently left out of the November 15th FEIS.

On November 15, 2006, the ESDC Board of Directors certified the Final EIS (FEIS) as complete. The FEIS studied a reduced program and other modifications to the proposed project as recommended by City Planning, as well as comments received from the public on the DEIS. The FEIS included a list of all substantive comments on the DEIS, and responses to each.

On September 27, 2006, the New York City Planning Commission voted on recommended changes to Atlantic Yards, and FCRC accepted these recommendations, which included, among other things, a reduction in the project’s overall size by 8 percent.

In August and September 2006, the ESDC hosted a public hearing and two community forums, during which members of the public had the opportunity to comment on the record regarding the DEIS. Hundreds of people participated in the public comment period for the Atlantic Yards DEIS, which closed September 29, 2006. Every substantive comment submitted during this process was responded to directly in the ultimate Final Environmental Impact Statement.

On July 18, 2006, the ESDC released the Atlantic Yards DEIS and GPP, formally starting the public review process and opening a public comment period that closed September 29, 2006.

On Friday, March 31, 2006, the ESDC released the Final Scope of Analysis, which was modified based on comments received at the Public Scoping meeting in 2005. In the Final Scope several areas of analysis were expanded or otherwise modified, and the proposed development was reduced in size by 475,000 gross square feet and in height by 231 feet or 23 stories. These reductions were made primarily in the market-rate housing component and did not affect the affordable or middle-income housing component.

A public meeting was held by ESDC on October 18, 2005, to discuss the Draft Scope of Analysis, which explains in detail the environmental issues that will be analyzed in the DEIS. The public submitted comments on the Draft Scope at this hearing and in the weeks following.

On September 16, 2005, the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) established itself as lead agency pursuant to statute and is responsible for overseeing the public review process. The public review includes a scoping process to determine what will be studied in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).

(Emphasis added)

What's missing

Note that the chronology provided in a letter to the IRS from the city and state includes one example of governmental action that, at least according to developer Forest City Ratner's web page on Public Process, does not constitute a serious part of the public process.

The city and state cite a February 2005 Memorandum of Understanding as an example of preliminary approval. That document certainly described what was contemplated, but it was non-binding.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…