Skip to main content

"It's just not right": City Council term limits override recalls AY hearing plaint

Who would've guessed that Mayor Mike Bloomberg's successful effort to have the City Council overturn and extend voter-imposed term limits (for themselves, Borough Presidents, and citywide office holders) would make the Atlantic Yards approval process look like an exercise in direct democracy?

The Atlantic Yards project was announced in December 2003; in September 2005, the Empire State Development Corporation began the process of the environmental review, which took 15 months.

Bloomberg's power move took all of three weeks. Of course, as with Atlantic Yards, he had supporters lined up.

Supporters' main justification--that the fiscal crisis required stability in office--was bogus. Most of those who will benefit from the opportunity to run again won't help with the fiscal crisis; after all, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz knows more about organizing concert series than municipal finance and some City Council members, if you hear them talk,are not the brightest bulbs.

And it has no bearing on Bloomberg's move to seek a third term, which emerged months ago, as business leaders expressed their desire to have him stay. (Michael D.D. White eviscerates the argument about Bloomberg's financial acumen.)

That's why City Council Member Letitia James (picture from NY Times), a leader of the opposition to term limits (and, not incidentally, to Atlantic Yards) declared, "This is a defining moment, a game-changing moment, that marks not the end of a process, but the beginning of a process.” She must've been hinting at litigation.

In the Observer, she was quoted: "I believe that this is really all about a legacy—about Moynihan Station, about Willets Point, about the West Side, about Ground Zero, and yes, about Atlantic Yards; and about the displacement of low, moderate and working families in New York City. Let me end by decrying, let the people decide."

Had Atlantic Yards gone through the city's Uniform Land Use Review Procedure, the City Council would've had a vote; at the least, dissenters (on both term limits and AY) like James and Council Member Charles Barron would've had a voice. (DDDB expresses no "surprise that this Mayor who unilaterally took the decision making power over Atlantic Yards away from the City Council, fostering Bruce Ratner's land grab, took the next step and grabbed the power, today, with strong arm tactics. What is a bit surprising is that the body whose power was usurped by the Mayor for Atlantic Yards allowed him to do it again.")

Public frustrated

As with the epic Atlantic Yards hearing in August 2006--remember CB 2 Chairperson Shirley McRae's letter of complaint about favoritism at the door--many people couldn't get into City Council last week to testify or today to witness the vote.

The New York Times reported that one of them Dan Cantor, the executive director of the Working Families Party, which has led opposition. "It’s outrageous that they are keeping people out of the meeting,” he said, “They know that this meeting would draw a lot of interest from the public. And they should have made some provisions to accommodate the public.”

In fact, the ItsOurDecision blog reported that security guards today were clamping down not on the rush to a self-serving vote but on people carrying signs larger than 8" x 11".

The "violator" pictured here, with a sign asserting, "When Christine Quinn opens her mouth, Michael Bloomberg's words come out," is Patti Hagan of the Prospect Heights Action Coalition, the first person to organize opposition to Atlantic Yards.

The tentacles of influence

As Noticing New York blogger Michael D.D. White has pointed out, Bloomberg, Markowitz, and Atlantic Yards developer Forest City Ratner wield influence via a web of charitable donations and transfers of governmental funds.

Assuming a legal challenge to the term limits override is unsuccessful, expect Council Members like James and Bill de Blasio to be punished by Quinn and Bloomberg, who will instead direct discretionary funds to more pliant representatives. In fact, such power politics likely got Council Member Darlene Mealy to change her mind, according to the Times.

Ripple effects

The decision yesterday will have enormous ripple effects, likely causing two-term Council Members to seek a relatively safe (because of the power of incumbency) third term rather than pursue a more competitive citywide office. Will Council Member David Yassky--who somehow remained undecided until he yesterday supported an amendment for a referendum, then, when it failed, supported Bloomberg's bill--run for Comptroller, as his web site indicates?

Will de Blasio continue his campaign to unseat Markowitz? Unlikely; I bet he'll try to keep a relatively safe seat. (James is actually still on her first full term--she replaced the assassinated James E. Davis.) In fact, a host of spirited Council candidates (e.g., Mark Winston Griffith) just saw their chances severely reduced.

The role of the press

The three main daily newspapers all lined up to support Bloomberg's effort, and that will tarnish their reputation as much as it tarnishes his legacy. Remember what Times editorial board member Carolyn Curiel said: "We are reasoned, in how we come to opinion. But no, it's not a democracy; it's reflective of the spirit of the Times." And that spirit includes "the opinion of the publisher, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr."

Yesterday, the Times editorial page acknowledged that the public was overwhelmingly against the City Council voting to overturn term limits, but still insisted term limits were bad public policy and should be extended. (They may not be good public policy, but the issue, of course, is changing the rules without a referendum or Charter Commission, and the undeniable power of the mayor's $100 million campaign war chest. Polls indicated an overwhelming 89% against the Council action.)

The Times editorial page didn't acknowledge the public hearing process, in which Bloomberg recruited beneficiaries of his charities to speak on his behalf. (Geoffrey Canada, the founder of the Harlem Children's Zone and the hero of Paul Tough's new book, Whatever It Takes, earned Tom Robbins's scorn.)

The Times, actually, was less brazen when the Atlantic Yards project reached the Public Authorities Control Board for final approval in December 2006. Whle the Post and the News endorsed the project, the Times was silent. I speculated that the Times, while editorially in favor of the project, was unwilling to confront the reality of its own reporting, which had raised major qualms about the credibility of Empire State Development Corporation Chairman Charles Gargano and the agency's work.

"Just not right"

The whole episode yesterday recalled a moment in the 8/23/06 hearing (transcript) on the Atlantic Yards Draft Environmental Impact Statement.

Late into the epic hearing, Steve Espinola, a member of the Prospect Heights Block Association (a member organization of the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods), criticized the Empire State Development Corporation for scheduling a follow-up community forum at a very inconvenient time

"I want to note, again, that you have scheduled a hearing the night of the democratic primary," Espinola said. "By picking this date, the Empire State Development Corporation is giving us all the unfortunate message that it does not respect our City's democratic process. Certainly you could have picked another night. It's just not right. It's just not right."

Espinola wasn't ranting; rather, he had the deeply wounded tone of someone who didn't think his government could do such a thing to his community.

Yesterday was another such day.

Haberman: can New Yorkers believe Bloomberg?

New York Times columnist Clyde Haberman, who, like all the other metro columnists in the city took a pass on Atlantic Yards, writes today:
Having legislatively muscled his way into a possible third term as mayor, Michael R. Bloomberg now faces what may be a more onerous challenge: How to convince New Yorkers that they can believe a single thing he says.

Two other columnists have paid attention to Atlantic Yards. Daily News sports columnist Mike Lupica has been consistently critical; he wrote of the term limits override:
If Mike Bloomberg is such a beloved, indispensable figure in our city, how come he has to keep spending so much of his own money to be mayor?

And Daily News editorial page columnist Errol Louis has been an AY cheerleader--and a forceful opponent of Bloomberg's machinations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…