Skip to main content

Brutally weird: a CBA block party on Pacific Street in the AY footprint

Permits for block parties in the city must be acquired 60 days ahead of time, so let's assume that the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement BLOCK PARTY! was scheduled well before the Supreme Court decision Monday not to accept the AY eminent domain appeal. Still, the event was not announced until late Monday afternoon.

That's curious. Stranger still, and brutally weird, is the location of the party: Pacific Street between Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues in the AY footprint, opposite the under-demolition Ward Bakery, where a stop-work order exists and where the handful of residents left are, as far as I know, plaintiffs in the eminent domain case or their relatives. As Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn comments, "Call us crazy but we thought block parties were thrown by PEOPLE LIVING ON THE BLOCK."

In other words, the "community" celebration is on a block scheduled for Phase 2 of the project, without start date or deadline, threatened by "condemnation blight." (And, as I've been reminded, the block will be demapped for the project, so it won't exist.) An email informs us that the organizer is Delia Hunley-Adossa, who also MC'd the strained "Brooklyn Day" rally.

Comments

  1. Brutally weird, and pretty desperate and pathetic. It might even be funny if it not for the fact that FCR will leave our community in shambles for the next 20 or 30 or ?? years.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eerie

    “Eerie” is in the title of the other most excellent AYR post of this date but perhaps it should have been in the title of this post as well.

    This is a story complete with a ghost town and other wandering phantoms as well.

    The block where this “block party” has been called for a by phantom non-residents is a ghost town slated for non-existence under the Ratner plan. How appropriate that it is to celebrate another phantom, the “community benefits agreement” set up in all it curled-parchment-promoted glory as if it is a real thing!

    Anyone thirsting to find benefit in the community benefits agreement will find themselves extremely “parched” indeed.

    Housing is probably the most important theoretical benefit provided for under the community benefits agreement but the agreement obligates Ratner to provide virtually no housing at all. Though lots of people who should know this, they apparently don’t. The housing components of that “agreement” negotiated by Bertha Lewis and ACORN afford an instrument for Ratner to provide only the most minimal housing conceivable. I think this has gone largely unappreciated. If anything, the agreement can be an instrument for Ratner to escape what would normally be his obligation to provide affordable housing as is his demonstrably wont (Remember his lobbying to escape housing obligations under the 421-a law?)

    For a detailed analysis of the virtual nothing that ACORN and Bertha Lewis negotiated in terms of housing under the “Community Benefits Agreement” see my extended comment at: “As groups lobby against tax-exempt bonds for sports facilities, is WFP hamstrung by ACORN's AY deal?” http://atlanticyardsreport.blogspot.com/2008/06/as-groups-lobby-against-tax-exempt.html)

    The other “eerie” AYR post of today includes a quote from Betha Lewis in the film “Brooklyn Matters”- “They had their bean counters and we had our bean counters.” - In my comment I mention the same quote pointing out that “Bertha Lewis obviously doesn’t know beans about counting beans.”

    As for being able to count, I find it ironic that delivery of other public benefit under the agreement is heavily dependant on Darryl E. Greene of the one-time Darryl E. Greene & Associates whom, not only from the headlines, but also because of work with him we know to have a suspicious amount of trouble when it comes to counting. (See: New York Times, “Lawyer Is Accused of Bilking City Agencies” Published: December 5, 1997 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B02EFDF103DF936A35751C1A961958260 and City of New York Department of Investigation Press Release “Government Contract Attorney-consultant Pleads Guilty in $500,000 Theft of Public Monies” http://www.nyc.gov/html/doi/pdf/pr022499.pdf)

    On whose side is the Darryl Greene who has a record of conveniently mangling numbers to take home a check? His relationship to Ratner apparently goes back to at least 2004. That makes it before the May 17, 2005 day that Bertha Lewis and ACORN signed away their right to speak credibly about Atlantic Yards.

    In an article in the Brooklyn Rail “Ratner Applies Full-Court Press on the Downtown Arena” (http://www.thebrooklynrail.org/local/nov04/ratner.html) which also includes information about BUILD and ACORN the following appears:

    “Specifics relating to terms of the agreement are few and far between. Its intention is to bind Forest City to certain standards that would ensure that Brooklyn Atlantic Yards would benefit Prospect Heights and the surrounding areas. At an October 26 BUILD meeting, Darryl Greene, a consultant for Forest City, laid out some of the points to expect.”

    The complicated reporting of important community benefit numbers is being handled and can only be seen through the fishily suspect eye of reports for which Greene is responsible- For a little on this see: Thursday, April 10, 2008: Errol Louis and the "Atlantic Yards pork pool"
    http://atlanticyardsreport.blogspot.com/2008/04/errol-louis-and-atlantic-yards-pork.html

    AYR has some information about Greene in a previous post: (See: Friday, December 01, 2006
    “The Darman Group (AY minority contracting coordinator) and the Malcom Smith connection”
    http://atlanticyardsreport.blogspot.com/2006/12/darman-group-ay-minority-contracting.html.

    **

    Back to housing- Maybe in honor of its ghost-town theme the block party should be attended exclusively by families with incomes between $38,407.00 and $46,086.20 eligible to reside in the “affordable housing”- Phantoms again!- Because the ACORN MOU with Ratner specifically provides that no such families shall be eligible for “affordable” housing (monthly rents of $2,880.45 for abnormally small apartments) though families (of four) earning much more ($122,899.20) and, under the federal tax code requirement, some families earning less will be eligible. Why were the families in this precluded income range consigned to phantomhood? Do you think that Ratner is in the business of negotiating benefits that might actually affect his bottom line?

    Michael D. D. White
    Noticing New York

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…