Skip to main content

ACORN past president on AY: (white) AMBIENCE vs. (black) SURVIVAL

Isn't the most important color in the Atlantic Yards debate green, as the Daily News' Michael O'Keeffe wrote back in June? O'Keeffe pointed out that some prominent supporters of the project received financial support from developer Forest City Ratner and emphasized the importance of analyzing the project's costs and benefits.

And the racial rhetoric has diminished, right? In an 11/12/06 New York Times article, ACORN executive director Bertha Lewis of ACORN was quoted:
“Everybody said crazy things on both sides,” Ms. Lewis said. “I’ve apologized to folks and folks have apologized to me.”

But there, in the Atlantic Yards Final Environmental Impact Statement, are some rather polarizing comments from Gloria Waldron, past president of ACORN, a group that stands to benefit by managing the affordable housing aspect of the plan and has received donations from Forest City Ratner.

The remarks differ significantly in tone, if not content, from Waldron's oral testimony at the August 23 public hearing. (All emphases are in the original.)

AMBIENCE for the white folk

In her written testimony (right), Waldron said, in part:
I have been here for previous debates and if I had to give it a title it would be AMBIENCE versus SURVIVAL
The all white people with token blacks are against the project, their qualms AMBIENCE
--The building is too tall and would case a shadow on the other buildings
--There would be too much noise when the games are going on
--We would not be able to use our parks
--And two legitimate ones traffic and eminent domain which is being addressed.
Also those that lived there would have first choice to return.

Waldron's summary is a truncated, conclusory, and dismissive list of the environmental concerns identified by numerous community groups and the Empire State Development Corporation.

And, of course, there are many other concerns. Black folk nearby have testified about their concerns about asthma. (City Council Member Letitia James got booed when she mentioned asthma!).

City Council Member Charles Barron, who along with James probably takes issue with being called a "token black," has criticized the project as "instant gentrification."
(Graphic from the Council of Brooklyn Neighborhoods. Click to enlarge.)

Note that, while ACORN members polled supported the project after they were told it would include affordable housing, most would not qualify for most of the AY affordable housing because their incomes are too low. Other long-established housing advocacy groups, including the Fifth Avenue Committee and the Pratt Area Community Council, have criticized the affordable housing component for not accommodating a broader income range.

SURVIVAL for the black folk

In her written submission, Waldron continued:

Then there was the all black with a token white contingency, their qualms SURVIVAL
--JOBS: There are 56% blacks that are not in prison and out of jobs, without jobs the prison number could raise. Also the contractors that are assured that for a change minority and women contractors would be given contracts.

--HOUSING: There is need low cost housing, this is one of the few known housing projects of the numerous that is going out all over the country that has even considered low and middle income housing.

There is indeed a need for subsidized housing; the question is: where do the subsidies go? Is this the only alternative? How many jobs would by generated by the public investment?

... But He [Jesus] considered the many as opposed to the few. The few who would be the residents of the area of the Atlantic Yards, the many is Brooklyn, the youth especially....

The building got taller with the inclusion of the low and middle cost housing; hence the other projects could be shorter because they did not include low and middle income homes. Gentlemen and Women we cannot have our cake and eat it too....

Waldron touches on an important issue--there can be tradeoffs between affordability and livability, and Forest City Ratner and ACORN's Lewis justify the size of the project because it includes affordable housing. But without any sense of the developer's bottom line (a billion dollars in profits?) and the total of the subsidies included, there's no way to assess the argument, only to know that the state is overriding zoning.

Also, the buildings were tall to start with, and the market-rate units would help cross-subsidize not just affordable units but also an arena.

Oral testimony

In her oral testimony (p. 330 of PDF; note that the transcription is inexact), Waldron was far less inflammatory:

I'm Gloria Waldron, the Executive Director of the new American Chamber of Commerce, that encourages black men and women to start their own businesses because the jobs are not here. The jobs are in China and India and what's here is downsize or legal. And we have so many black men in prison and they be left outside. Fifty-six percent are unemployed, that is why I support the Atlantic Yards.

She doesn't try to analyze how many people actually would be helped, and how many jobs would go to the people she cites.

I start by thanking New York ACORN. We asked about Atlantic Yards. We went around and found out what was the project in the area, they said eminent domain and getting the houses back. So we said we will address that and you can tell ACORN if you have a problem with that, call us because we want to address that. And the number is 718-246-7900 or just look up ACORN. And I want you to know that it is important for us to have this project. I live in East New York. Some of the schools are using oil heat, but there's a big prison there for children seven to fourteen years old, no hearing, you know.

I can't -- if Atlantic Yards -- if the Atlantic Yards had failed to be a process I suggest you putting up a building, a building like everybody else, we would not be here today. But they choose to call the entire community in to see that everybody gets a fair deal and that is why we are here today.

For the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement, signed by eight groups, most of them fledgling, "the entire community" was not called in.

I say we need the community benefits agreement to be sure that everybody got a fair deal. And if you have a problem with that, talk to us, we still -- we still will work with you, but the project must go on for Brooklyn, for our young people -- (Audience participation) -- for our black men that are unemployed. We need the project. (Audience participation.)

The "audience participation" consisted of cheers.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…