Skip to main content

Featured Post

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park FAQ, timeline, and infographics (pinned post)

Making Sense of the 962 Pacific Street Rezoning Story (Substack)

Making Sense of the 962 Pacific Street Rezoning Story (link)

The New York Times wrongly posited a NIMBY backlash, missing the Community Board's affordability gain, and downplayed reasons for skepticism. But yes, it was Council Member Hudson's call.

From the article:

Why should I write about a New York Times series on the ā€œaffordability crisis,ā€ which included two articles chronicling 962 Pacific Street, an empty lot that might have delivered a new 150-unit building with affordable housing in Crown Heights?

Because 1) yes, itā€™s Atlantic Yards-adjacent, in a few ways; 2) the Times got some key things wrong; and 3) such coverage furthers the simple ā€œbuild more homesā€ narrative. As the only reporter to steadily cover 962 Pacific, I know the story of this failed rezoning is far more complicatedā€”and strangeā€”than presented.

Notably, Brooklyn Community Board 8 didnā€™t offer knee-jerk opposition, but successfully negotiated more affordable housing than landowner Nadine Oelsner initially proposed and some CB 8 leaders, as well as Oelsnerā€™s nonprofit housing partner, were willing to accept.

From version of developerā€™s presentation with 38 affordable units

For the rest of this long article, click here.



Comments