Skip to main content

At what Forest City Ratner calls a press conference, the temporary alliance between Bertha Lewis and Marty Golden

I finally got video (by Adrian Kinloch) excerpts of the "press conference" organized by Forest City Ratner during the July 29 Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) hearing on Atlantic Yards at the Klitgord Auditorium of New York City Technical College.

It was more of a "press event" than a press conference, given that there was no opportunity for questions, supporters kept cheering, and the timing was organized for the arrival of television cameras.

Strange bedfellows


Though several Atlantic Yards backers (union leaders, Kathryn Wylde of the Partnership for New York City) made speeches for the cameras, the stars, so to speak, were State Senator Marty Golden (R-Bay Ridge) and ACORN Chief Organizer Bertha Lewis.

They make for some strange bedfellows.

The ethically-challenged Golden, for example, has long sided with the real estate industry, not tenant groups, in refusing to support the repeal of vacancy decontrol, which currently allows rent-stabilized apartments to leave the system. ACORN, of course, opposes vacancy decontrol and recently led a rally outside Golden's office.

Golden's moment

The video begins with Lewis offering a chant, "Fired up. We can't take delays no more."

Then a man in a cap protests people being moved out of their homes--I'm not sure if he was referring to the AY footprint or, more likely, general displacement in Brooklyn.

Then Golden, a former cop, tells the group--mostly union members and ACORN members--that police have warned them to stop the screaming and the chanting. After all, there's a hearing going on nearby.

(By the way, in the background, the dark-haired fellow with the yellow tie is newly elected Queens City Council Member Eric Ulrich, from distant Ozone Park, like Golden one of the relatively few Republican elected officials in the city. Remember, the Republicans usually steer clear of ACORN.)

Golden's analysis

"It's important that focus on why we're here." Golden continues. "There's been stalling tactics going on on this property for over four years. We are denied jobs. We are denied housing. We are denied income in the communities. We are denied tax revenue for the city and state, and this is plain wrong."

"This is the last hurdle, ladies and gentleman. This is the last hurdle today. When we get the final approval, God willing, which will be shortly, we will start building the Atlantic Yards and putting the Nets in Brooklyn..."

The question of course, is: who's we? Since when was the Atlantic Yards project a project under public ownership or public control? Golden did not see fit to mention the name of developer Forest City Ratner. (Nor did he bother to testify publicly, subjecting himself to potential hisses or jeers from both AY opponents and ACORN members experiencing cognitive dissonance.)

"We need those 17,000 jobs," he continues. "We need those 8000 permanent jobs. We need that 5.6 billion dollars in revenues to the city and the state."

Some of Golden's numbers come from statements he made at the state Senate oversight hearing May 29 (see video, at about 8:30) but they're still bogus. Then-ESDC CEO Marisa Lago said that the General Project Plan estimated about 12,000 construction jobs.

(Actually, it would be 12,568 job-years, which means about 1257 jobs a year over the announced ten years or, if the project takes 25 years, 503 jobs a year.)

That $5.6 billion figure appears nowhere in state documents, as I've written. It is a figment from Forest City Ratner, though FCR lawyers have claimed it was a government statement. All the government numbers are based on a ten-year buildout, as well as an office tower built early in the first phase, both of which are completely unrealistic.

Golden on housing

He went on to erroneously describe the housing plan: "The 2245 low-income housing [units]."

No, of the 2250 subsidized "affordable" units, 900 would be considered low-income, for households under 50% of the Area Median Income (AMI), which--given that it incorporates wealthy suburban counties--is well above Brooklyn's AMI.

"The 450 senior housing apartments," he continued.

Actually, ten percent, or 225, of the 2250 subsidized units would be for senior citizens, as Lewis herself has stated.

"Almost 6000 apartments for the people of Brooklyn," he continued.

Well, the apartments would be for people who end up in Brooklyn, but there's no guarantee they would go to people from Brooklyn. Half of the affordable units, or 1125 units, are designated for people from the three adjacent community boards, but that's it; the rest would be via lottery.

Lewis's analysis

Though Lewis made a partial attempt in her testimony to use logic (her biggest selling point was that the units would be rent-stabilized, even though most would be too expensive for her followers), at the press conference, it was all about emotion: "Enough of the stalling," she bellowed. "Enough of folks trying to make Brooklyn their own little bucolic playground."

Does she really equate people questioning Atlantic Yards as an effort to make Brooklyn a "little bucolic playground," especially since the alternative UNITY Plan proposes high-density (though not as high-density as AY) and a significant slice of affordable housing?

"We need real jobs here," she continued. "Five and a half years ago, we were in an emergency situation. People needed jobs then. People need housing now more than ever. Here we are five and a half years later."

Note that ACORN is contractually obligated to support the project and in debt to FCR to the tune of $1 million. So Lewis wasn't about to acknowledge any skepticism about the project, such as the likelihood, acknowledged in ESDC documents, that only one tower would be built for several years.

In closing

"Ladies and gentlemen, we are fired up," Lewis continued. "We can't take it no more. Enough is enough. You better build it, and build it now."

Was that a threat? Does that constitute cogent testimony on the pending project plan? 

Has Ulrich, who has said that "taxpaying citizens" shouldn't bear the brunt of the economic crisis, looked into the numbers regarding AY?

Behind Lewis, in the light-colored blouse and designer glasses, is Delia Hunley-Adossa, who's challenging incumbent City Council Member Letitia James, the project's leading political opponent.

Comments

  1. This post asks the question whether Queens City Council Member Eric Ulrich, who has said that "taxpaying citizens" shouldn't bear the brunt of the economic crisis, looked into the numbers regarding AY?

    At the press conference we were asking Council member Ulrich about his political credentials and whether he could identify the biggest boondoggle project in the city. He noted that this seemed to be a baited question. He said “certainly not this one” but could not identify another project. We asked him whether he knew how much subsidy was proposed to be going into Atlantic Yards. He said he did not and suggested perhaps Kathy Wylde would know how much subsidy was going into the project. But when we asked Ms. Wylde whether she knew how much subsidy was going into the project she did not give us a response that convinced us that she actually knew. We also asked Delia Hunley-Adossa whether she knew how much subsidy was going into the project and she simply ignored us.

    Our bet is that none of the those who showed up at the press conference to politically support the megadevelopment, including Mr. Eric Ulrich, know how much subsidy is going into the project. That was not the point of their showing up.

    But it is irresponsible of Queens City Council Member Eric Ulrich to show up not taking this into consideration. The fact of the matter is that the subsidies are so massive they could make a very big difference to every New York including his Queens constituents if those billions were redistributed where they ought to go.

    Michael D. D. White
    Noticing New York

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …