Skip to main content

Featured Post

Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park infographics: what's built/what's coming/what's missing, who's responsible, + project FAQ/timeline (pinned post)

DDDB breaks down the "bait and switch"; New York magazine critic seems to agree

Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn distributed a flier today and has posted it on the web. (Click to enlarge)

The text of the flier

World-renowned architect Frank Gehry was used by Bruce Ratner to gain public and political support for his Atlantic Yards proposal. But on June 4th Ratner officially fired Gehry from the entire project and released a new design for the arena.

DDDB’s opposition to Atlantic Yards was never about the architect, it has been guided by the fact that the whole project and process is a violation of the public trust, not just the recent bait and switch with Frank Gehry. The Gehry bait and switch is emblematic of a pattern with the Atlantic Yards project. Just some of the earlier examples are:

BAIT: 50% “affordable” housing...
SWITCH: 37% “affordable” housing, with no answers about how many units there will be or when (and most units wouldn’t be affordable to most Brooklynites.)

Actually, only 30 percent of Phase 1 must be affordable, and there's no timeline for Phase 2.

BAIT: 8 acres of “publicly accessible open space”
SWITCH: 6 acres of inner condo courtyards & the once promised public arena rooftop park is gone.

Actually, the statement about six acres is murky. Perhaps more importantly, all the permanent open space would be in Phase 2, which is unscheduled.

BAIT: 10,000 office jobs
SWITCH: Zero office space is now planned.

When approved, the project was to have space for 1344 jobs but perhaps 375 new jobs. More recently, an office tower of more than 500,000 square feet has been announced--with space presumably for 2000+ jobs--but there's no market for it.

BAIT: 4,500 housing units
SWITCH: 6,430 units

The switch from office space to housing might be considered an accommodation to the market. But the office market was already tanking when AY was announced.

BAIT: Commitment to buy MTA’s rail yards for the lowball sum of $100 million at closing & construct a state-of-the-art, new rail yard and a platform over the yards.
SWITCH: $10 or $20 million at closing and no state-of-the-art rail yard or platform.

We'll see discussion of this Monday morning at the MTA Finance Committee meeting.

BAIT: Construction timeline when approved was 10 years for the whole project
SWITCH: Marisa Lago, CEO of Empire State Development Corporation (the state agency overseeing the project) says it will take “decades.” Nearly half a year after approval Ratner got agreements with City and State to take 6 years to build just the arena, 12 years to build Phase 1 (arena & 4 towers), no timeline for Phase 2 where the bulk of the affordable housing was proposed.

BAIT: Would remove alleged “blight”
SWITCH: Ratner has created real blight.

In New York magazine

New York magazine architecture critic Justin Davidson seems to agree, at least in part, writing:
Ratner didn’t just toss Gehry into the drink; he betrayed the city, blighted a neighborhood he promised to transform, validated his opponents, and blew a colossal opportunity to bring great architecture to a city that badly needs it.

And why won't Gehry criticize Ratner? Davidson points to Gehry's other work for Ratner (as I have):
The completion of Beekman Tower keeps Gehry yoked to Ratner for now, and the normally unguarded architect has retreated into silence, broken only by a single boilerplate press release. (“We remain extremely proud of our work … ” etc.)