Skip to main content

Errol Louis and the "Atlantic Yards pork pool"

Daily News columnist Errol Louis cares about politicians giving away the public's money, but not when it comes to Atlantic Yards.

In a 4/6/08 column headlined Speaker Quinn and her pork pool, Louis wrote:
It seems there is no limit to how much of the public's money politicians will steal, waste and abuse if we don't keep a close and skeptical eye on them. The piggies have been busy lately, and it's going to cost us plenty.

What we know so far about the budget scandal engulfing the City Council is that the Council has, since 2001, allocated $17 million by giving grants to nonexistent organizations.


"Local selfishness"

Remember Louis's exchange about subsidies with Assemblyman Richard Brodsky in September 2006. The “local selfishness” regarding subsidies, Louis said, is something “I accept as the lay of the land… If they’re going to get a billion-dollar TIF [tax-increment financing] deal in Rensselaer County, I think where I live, in Kings County, if somebody wants to bring a billion-dollar deal there, with way too much paid per job, in my neighborhood, where there’s a lot of unemployment, personally, I would say, ‘You know what? I’ll take that.’”

Brodsky was unimpressed. “That is a prescription for a bigger disaster. ‘My pork is good. Your pork is bad.’ is not a principled response to the pissing away of billions of dollars.”

AY subsidies

A day after Louis's column about Quinn, I reported that, despite $305 million in pledged direct public subsidies for Atlantic Yards, a top executive told investment analysts that "we still need more” subsidies.

Will Louis address that? Nah. A column last month about Atlantic Yards suggested that "those who want prosperity and progress in Brooklyn" project should, among other things, "negotiate improvements to the plan with Ratner."

And today, rather than criticize the "Atlantic Yards pork pool," Louis, in a column headlined Building a better economic outlook, writes a valentine to Avi Schick, acting CEO of the Empire State Development Corporation, an "unsung hero" who keeps "the machinery of growth humming in good times and bad."

Community layoffs?


Louis quotes Darnell Canada of Rebuild:
"I had 10 guys straight out of the community who we trained to be apprentices in construction safety, and another 10 in line behind them," Canada tells me.

All the trainees were unemployed, says Canada, half of them living in the Fort Greene housing projects (as does Canada). They took courses on the ins and outs of construction safety, including spotting when a crane is leaning dangerously and learning how to prevent tons of dirt from spilling and suffocating workers.

The first of Canada's trainees were hired at Atlantic Yards but recently got laid off as the souring economy caused the project's developer, Bruce Ratner, to delay the project. According to Ratner, it will take longer than anticipated to build the commercial skyscraper and 6,400 apartments that will surround a planned basketball arena.

"These were real good jobs. After a year as an apprentice, you take a test and start making $55 an hour - not just a worker's position, it's management. And there's so much need for safety management on these sites, it's crazy," Canada says.


(Canada, a veteran community activist, is also known for his ominous "You're the victim" speech at the hearing on the Atlantic Yards Draft Environmental Impact Statement, captured in the film "Brooklyn Matters." Next screening May 1.)

Looking more closely

Louis's summary--"According to Ratner, it will take longer than anticipated"--is supremely sketchy, given the longstanding lack of affordable housing bonds and the fact that the project, when it was approved in December 2006, was behind the announced construction schedule.

As for the jobs, it's not at all clear how many people have been hired from the Fort Greene projects and how many of those jobs are on the $55/hour track.

According to a February 6 Report to the Downtown Brooklyn Advisory & Oversight Committee prepared by Forest City Ratner, about $46 million in contracts had been awarded at the time, with 21 placements from the Community Labor Exchange.

That's about one local job for every $2.2 million in contracts. (Of course there are more jobs in total. Then again, at least $55 million in public funds has already been distributed.) There were only three jobs from any one zip code, including that containing the Fort Greene projects (11201).

A less contentious process for developing at the MTA's Vanderbilt Yard might have resulted in a smaller project but one that proceeded more rapidly, with jobs for community members.

But in this case, rather than "keep a close and skeptical eye" on the politicians, Louis essentially endorses the concept of "My pork is good. Your pork is bad."

He quotes Schick:
"What regular people want is for development to happen," Schick says. "They're not interested in whether it satisfies every critic and whether it's the most perfect thing. They say life is difficult, there's not enough apartments, not enough jobs, not enough transportation and they want better. They just want it delivered.

Maybe they do. And maybe developers want more subsidies, too.

Comments

  1. As usual, the Oder-ized version of reality depends on omission and distortion.

    Oder has repeatedly referenced a panel from 2 years ago at which Assemblyman Brodsky and I expressed differing opinions about how and when economic development subsidies should be used. Oder, who was sitting in the room, always omits my response to Brodsky during the same exchange, in which I pointed out that Brodsky, who postures as a reformer and budget hawk but has voted, year after year, for member items decided without hearings, testimony or disclosure – a scandal that is part of the permanent rot in Albany.

    In recent days, Brodsky was part of the Assembly clique that killed congestion pricing in a back room without a public vote, then voted to pass a pork-laden budget with – as usual – tens of millions of public money spent on member items that neither Oder nor anybody else knows about in detail because the information isn’t disclosed.

    Mr. Brodsky is also one of the politicians who helped kill the commuter tax years ago, saving his suburban constituents a pretty penny while costing the city an estimated $5.5 billion in lost revenue so far, and at least half a billion more every year.

    Think Oder will ever notice or mention these assaults on the treasury by his from Westchester? Nah. He's too busy whining about every stray reference to “Downtown Brooklyn.”

    Further comments will appear in Daily News and/or Our Time Press, where I will continue the same argument I’ve made publicly for over 20 years: that Central Brooklyn needs and deserves massive amounts of investment in the form of foundation grants, fair access to credit, corporate investments, more and better policing – and, yes, government subsidies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brodsky is certainly vulnerable to criticism on multiple fronts.

    Still, it's notable that Louis's skepticism toward Christine Quinn is not matched by skepticism toward Forest City Ratner.

    As for what I "always" omit, had Louis taken the opportunity to post this comment earlier, well, I'd have taken it into account.

    However, a look at the transcript
    http://www.drummajorinstitute.org/transcripts/hottinger_transcript_FINAL.pdf
    shows that the "pork" discussion appears on p. 18 and the response regarding member items--a legitimate criticism but directed more to the legislature as a whole than to Brodsky--appears on p. 26. In other words, it wasn't a direct response.

    Links to the event:
    http://DMIpanel.notlong.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. So what Avi Schick, acting CEO of the Empire State Development Corporation is saying is that when it comes to awarding unprecedented megasubsidies ($2-2.5 billion) he can’t walk and chew gum at the same time?- He is only capable of making delivering development, not capable of delivering good development? Not capable of delivering development with subsides that are bid? Not capable of delivering development that holds a developer to a reasonable timetable? Not capable of delivering good design? Not capable of delivering appropriate density or keeping streets and avenues open and in public ownership? Not capable of delivering appropriate government oversight? Not capable of dealing with more than one developer at a time? Not capable of being a government official who takes the upper hand with a developer? Not capable of adaptively reusing valuable old and historic buildings and engaging in other green development practices? No capable of preventing obvious eminent domain abuse by saying “no” to gratuitous eminent domain just for the purpose of windfall? Not capable of stretching subsidies and awarding no more than needed?

    A capable government official leverages public expenditures by doing all of these things well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Louis writes that "that Central Brooklyn needs and deserves massive amounts of investment in the form of... yes, government subsidies."

    Forest City Enterprises CEO Chuck Ratner said "we still need more" subsidies. The "we" was not referring to Central Brooklyn.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Economic development subsidies, by definition, go to private parties, making Oder's comment nonsensical -- but perfectly consisent with his history of manning the barricades against support for development in Central Brooklyn.

    ReplyDelete
  6. [Errol Louis's previous comment, just posted, didn't show up in my email box but rather on the comments moderation page, which I rarely have reason to check. Hence the delay in posting.]

    I'll trust readers to consider the distinction between subsidies directed at a variety of potential recipients and those directed at, and solicited by, specific parties.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

For Atlantic Yards Quality of Life meeting Sept. 19, another bare-bones agenda (green wall?)

A message from Empire State Development (ESD) reminds us that the next Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park Quality of Life Meeting--which aims to update community members on construction and other issues--will be held:
Tuesday, September 19, 2017 @ 6 pm
Shirley Chisholm State Office Building
55 Hanson Place
1st Floor Conference Room
Brooklyn, NY 11217 The typically bare-bones, agenda, below, tells us nothing about the content of the presentation. One thing to look for is any hint of plans to start a new building on the southeast block of the project by the end of the year.

If not, ESD is supposed to re-evaluate a longstanding request from project neighbors to move back a giant wall encroaching on part of Dean Street between Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues. It's said to enclose construction activity, but, in recent months, has significantly served to protect worker parking.

Also, by the way, if you search for Atlantic Yards on Google or the ESD website, it leads to this page for the Atlantic Ya…