Skip to main content

On the affordable housing lottery analysis: 1M in Housing Connect; an advocate's concern

I'll be on WBAI/99.5 this morning at around 7:30 a.m. to talk about my housing lottery article.

My City Limits article, headlined The Real Math of An Affordable Housing Lottery: Huge Disconnect Between Need and Allotment, was spurred by two things: the common-sense suspicion that many more lower-income people apply for housing lotteries and my increasing frustration with the use of catch-all statistics by the press and others.

(After all, the developers of Hunters Point South had to advertise and assemble a street team to recruit middle-income households.)

So I got the data and drilled down. As I wrote, such statistics camouflage how low-income applicants face crushing odds compared to middle-income ones:
Exactly 92,743 households (not quite 95,000) entered the lottery for the "100% affordable" 535 Carlton tower, city data show. But only 2,203, according to City Limits' analysis, were eligible for 148 middle-income apartments, such as one-bedrooms renting for $2,680 monthly and two-bedrooms at $3,223, affordable to those earning six figures.
Back in December 2015, I wrote on Twitter: "Prediction: 1st #AtlanticYards @pacificparkbk "100% affordable" towers will get 10Ks of applicants. Most willB4 low-income units."

That was right, I finally determined after analyzing the massive spreadsheet with the list of applicants. And, I learned, no one else--advocate, researcher, journalist--had ever done that analysis.

An astounding number

One astounding statistic I learned: there are more than 1 million people in the Housing Connect system, more than three times the 290,000 figure in January 2015.

Once people have their profile fully filled out--surely some, like me, just logged on to check out the system--they can then easily apply to multiple lotteries. That ensures a large number of entrants to any lottery that includes low-income units.

In other words, while there were more than 170,000 applications for 535 Carlton and 50% affordable 461 Dean, it's likely many were the same.

City framing

It's understandable that city officials want to make the case for below-market but not cheap housing. They have arguments, though not the strongest ones.

When NY1 "Inside City Hall" anchor Errol Louis in July 2014 suggested it was "a bit of a shock" to allot so many units to better-off households, Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen responded, "I think it's shocking that the city has gotten so expensive... that people who make $100,000 a year are now considered really in the sweet spot for needing affordable housing."

Maybe some need it, but the lottery results suggest otherwise.

In a Twitter exchange last December, mayoral spokesman Wiley Norvell contended that 100% affordable towers like 535 Carlton represented a step up from 50% affordable 461 Dean (aka B2). "That same 50% in B2 is straight market rate," Norvell wrote. "We tugged market to middle, mid to mod and mod to low."

That wasn't quite so, given that, in the universe of Atlantic Yards affordable housing, the low-income units should have meant 40%, not 30% of the total.

More importantly, Norvell didn't acknowledge that 535 Carlton and the similar 38 Sixth wouldn't fully replace 50/30/20 towers but instead enable future 100% market towers. In other words, "affordable" units have been front=loaded, but they're not that affordable.

It should be noted that only about 11% of de Blasio's affordable housing plan is supposed to go to middle-income households, so a 100% affordable building with 65% middle-income units is unusual. That said, the lottery for 461 Dean, which has a more varied allotment of units, was nearly as skewed toward lower-income households.

Concern from an advocate

One interesting thing that surfaced in my article was the criticism from Ismene Speliotis, Executive Director of Mutual Housing Association of NY (MHANY) Management, which manages the affordable housing process for Pacific Park.

“Not to say that people in those higher bands aren’t looking for apartments,” said Speliotis, “[but] there’s a disconnect between the population’s need and the apartment distribution.” She spoke with Jarrett Murphy, editor of City Limits, who contributed to my article.

Speliotis, formerly of ACORN's housing arm, is a longtime advocate for affordable housing, and has publicly testified in favor of moving Atlantic Yards ahead and increasing affordability. Unlike some, she did not publicly cheer the "100% affordable housing" that's mostly aimed at middle-income households. But it sounds like she'd like more of a focus on low-income units, in both this project and in general.

Speliotis knows that Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park is behind on its low-income affordable housing obligations, and she said the developer is well aware of the issue. (Developer Greenland Forest City Partners wouldn't respond to queries.)

What does that mean down the road? More subsidies for lower-income units? More political pressure? Or promises averted?

The lack of the promised Independent Compliance Monitor--required under the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement but never hired--means a lack of publicly accessible oversight.

We do know that the Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park market-rate housing is significantly delayed, with developer Forest City Ratner--presumably in concert with joint venture partner/overseer Greenland USA--citing uncertainty about the 421-a tax break, increased construction costs, and the glut of market-rate units in and around Downtown Brooklyn.

The large majority of below-market units are expected to come in large buildings over the Vanderbilt Yard, for which a deck is still being constructed.
My October 2016 annotation of an August 2014 tentative schedule
Middle-income rejections

From the article:
Reflecting on the lottery process, Speliotis said it was “really tough” to lease middle-income units, because lottery winners—some of whom may pay below 30 percent of their income right now—have more options than their lower-income counterparts. Some are wary of disclosing their financial information or prefer apartments larger than those produced under new city design guidelines for subsidized buildings.
Along with that, only 360 households initially qualified for the 44 two-bedroom apartments renting at $3,223 a month. Those are pretty good chances, and even more for the 111 applicants who could take advantage of the community preference, which designates half of 535 Carlton’s units are designated for residents from nearby Community Districts.

Middle-income households, even if they find tempting a new apartment near transit, have other options. Consider this quote from a forum for applicants to the 461 Dean housing lottery, where the middle-income units were less expensive, with two-bedrooms at $2,400 and $3,012:
after a lot of thinking between my husband and myself we have decided to turn down the 461 dean apt. We have to do what is best for our family. And the 2 bedroom we were offered is not it. It is way too small for a family to live and grow. In the same price range, granted in a less "desireable" neighborhood we can find something 2 times the size. Something we can grow in, not these tiny apartments. I may sound ungrateful since lottery apts are so hard to get but its just not for us.
Here's a quote from a forum for applicants to the 38 Sixth housing lottery:
I am actually eligible for studios in both the 145% [$1,713/month] and 165% [$2,121/month] tiers but would definitely have to turn down an offer in the 165% tier because that is unaffordable for me and I would have to think very hard if I want to pay the $1713 in the 145% tier. Plus I am currently in the running for 1 of 2 one bedrooms in Harlem that are $150+ less in rent through another lottery. So I don't know why I feel so in limbo about this one, lol.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…