Skip to main content

Bitter lawsuits between Nassau Coliseum project partners Forest City Ratner and Blumenfeld Development Group

First Skanska, now Blumenfeld. In less than a year, Forest City Ratner and Bruce Ratner have become embroiled in bitter legal battles with former partners.

The latest involves a lawsuit (bottom) filed by Blumenfeld Development Group (BDG), a Nassau County-based developer that worked with Forest City on East River Plaza and was a rival bidder for the Nassau Coliseum project before joining up with Forest City's Nassau Events Center (NEC) to win the bid over rival Madison Square Garden.

The lawsuit portrays Ed Blumenfeld and Ratner of having developing significant ties, "beyond a mere business relationship into a long-standing personal friendship and one of confidence and trust." Not any more.

BDG's lawsuit contends that its role--bringing local expertise and connections--was key to the successful bid, and cites email from Forest City principals confirming that.

BDG believed it would be equal partners with Forest City in the retail and entertainment portion of the site. As reported in Long Island Business News, Blumenfeld sues Forest City over Coliseum project:
BDG has been busy designing the retail/entertainment portion of the redevelopment which would have contained about 300,000 square feet of restaurants, retail and entertainment businesses, including a 100,000-square-foot Bass Pro Shops mega-store, a Dave & Buster’s, Modells, an indoor trampoline park, a multi-screen movie theater and a few eateries.
But in February, Forest City Ratner told BDG that it wanted to build a much smaller retail/entertainment component—around half the size of BDG’s plan–that would have a bowling alley, a movie theater and a restaurant to complement its $229 million, 13,000-seat revamped arena.
Forest City spokeswoman Ashley Cotton told Newsday (Blumenfeld Development sues Forest City Ratner Cos. over Coliseum project) that "our concern is the long-term economic viability of a project that we believe meets the needs and expectations of the county. Unfortunately, their vision was at odds with ours."

Dueling lawsuits

Last week, Forest City filed a pre-emptive suit against BDG, asking a judge to formally rule the partnership broken--a move BDG's lawsuit says "contains numerous blatant falsehoods." Long Island Business News reported that Forest City accused BDG of making arrangements with tenants behind its back.

At this point, given that legal documents are by nature self-serving, it's hard to tell who's right. But the more detailed BDG lawsuit has detail that bolsters the argument that the company was, at the least, misled.

Drilling down

The joint venture (JV), according to the BDG lawsuit, meant BDG and Forest City would be 50/50 partners regarding the Retail Space and the Future Development Space, while BDG would have an option to buy 5% in the Arena Space. The lease for the Nassau Coliseum site site listed BDG as a member and owner of NEC.

In August 2014, after working for more than a year, BDG and Forest City executed a Memorandum of Understanding to memorialize the terms of the joint venture, including the 50/50 partnerships.

In September, BDG, on behalf of the JV, signed a letter of intent with Bass Pro Shops to lease 80,000 to 120,000 square feet in the retail space. Ratner sent congratulations. In November, Forest City's Jim Lester sent David Blumenfeld a revised lease for Bass Pro and raised concerns about it.

Although the parties were supposed to sign a formal JV agreement by 11/14/14, Forest City sent BDG a draft with only two days to go. Based on their history of trust and work, the parties "continued to act in furtherance of the Joint Venture" even after the deadline.

The complication, according to BDG's lawsuit, is that Ratner in September "apparently began unilateral discussions with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Hospital (MSK) about building a facility on the Coliseum site. (Ratner's a member of the hospital board.)

Parking became a concern, since the new facility would displace about 1000 surface parking spaces and also would require 450 spaces. But MSK was willing to build parking only for its own needs, not the displaced spaces.

Various parties at a meeting, including Forest City's Jim Lester, agreed another parking structure was needed. BDG and other business groups would ask Gov. Cuomo for state funds for a parking structure.

Ratner's intervention?

"Upon information and belief, Ratner became enraged when he learned that BDG and Forest City's Jim Lester had discussed the need for a parking structure with MSK and the possibility of getting state funding," the BDG suit says. "Apparently Ratner mistakenly believed BDG was somehow trying to unilaterally impose a new, onerous condition."

The suit says that Ratner's personal connection meant he wanted full control, so he wrongfully demanded that BDG stop communicating with any involved parties in the Coliseum Project. In December, Lester canceled weekly meetings regarding the Coliseum plan.

At a dinner 2/10/15, Ratner told BDG he wanted Forest City to control all aspects of the initial development without BDG "interference." Ratner said the parties had different visions; BDG said they'd filed a joint vision: a conceptual master plan (CMP).

But Ratner said he wanted to build only the minimum retail required, not the amount in the CMP, though that plan would not maximize revenues for the county or the JV. Ratner also reversed his previous enthusiasm about Bass Pro and said he was no longer interested.

"When BDG asked Ratner how he thought this new plan would work, Ratner admitted it might not work, and stated all he was really concerned with was 'getting a shovel in the the ground' to protect the arena component of the Lease," according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit says that, after soliciting BDG as a partner, and using its expertise to gain an edge in the bidding and in the company's connections, Ratner wants sole control.

Pushing for resolution

BDG on 2/25/15 asked Ratner to resume the weekly meetings and warned of litigation. Ratner 3/5/15 rejected the request. BDG asked Nassau County Executive Ed Mangano to mediate, but Ratner refused to cooperate, the lawsuit says.

Om 3/26/15, after an article surfaced in Long Island Business News discussing the dispute, Ratner "caused NEC to preemptively file a frivolous lawsuit" that disavowed the JV and sought a declaration that BDG was not a partner in NEC. The earlier lawsuit claims that BDG caused "delays and gridlock," but the new suit says all deadlines have been met.

And while the first lawsuit claims that BDG had a "fundamentally different vision," the CMP filed in December has both firms' names on it and was a joint effort, according to the latest lawsuit.

"There was no 'unwillingness' to work through the issues" regarding MSK, according to the lawsuit, "only Ratner's desire to wrongfully usurp control of the entire Project, to the exclusion of BDG and to the detriment of Nassau County and its residents."

BDG wants the court to order the JV enforced, and asks for unspecified financial damages. BDG also says Ratner's relationship with the hospital means he's breached fiduciary duties to Nassau Events Center. The lawsuit also seeks damage from Ratner personally.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…