Skip to main content

Forest City Ratner's new Chinese partner will help revamp Barclays Center roof. Are architectural/environmental "enhancements" a fix to limit escaping bass?

It's been barely acknowledged, and clearly obscured, but the Shanghai-based Greenland Group, Brooklyn developer Forest City Ratner's new partner on Atlantic Yards, will help fix the Barclays Center roof.

In response to my query, Empire State Development (ESD), the state agency overseeing/shepherding Atlantic Yards, said Forest City "is considering improvements that would enhance the architectural and environmental attributes of the roof."

What could that mean?

Well, right now the roof --once billed as public space, with green elements--now offers a logo'd advertisement for Barclays. Also, it serves as a sieve for noise, allowing bass from particularly loud concerts to penetrate residents' apartments.

So, enhancing the "environmental attributes" could mean prettying up that roof with some vegetation, taking a cue from that green roof over the subway entrance in the arena plaza.

That might boost the value of the apartments overlooking the arena, including the B2 tower, slated to open in December. After all, who wants to pay $3,300+ for a one-bedroom and look down at a logo?

After all, few of SHoP's renderings in the press handout for B2 show any hint of the roof, and the "night [helicopter] view from Flatbush Avenue," at right, omits the logo.

As for enhancing, the "architectural attributes," well, the arena's built. The roof is built.

How could the roof need an expensive design improvement--and, if it's part of the Greenland deal, it won't be cheap? The only architectural enhancement I could imagine would involve tamping down that pesky bass. (Yes, there were defective bolts on the building's exterior, but that involved the facade, not the roof.)

As I've written, that's been a periodic problem--and source of a $3200 fine--during the arena's initial 17 months of operation. Also, arena operators arena spent more than $500,000 to install 1,800 acoustic baffles last year.

Arena "excluded" from Greenland deal

The process has hardly been transparent.

When, on 10/11/12, Forest City and the Chinese government-owned Greenland announced the signing of a memorandum of understanding regarding the Atlantic Yards project, the companies said the "joint venture would cover both phase one and phase two of the project--excluding Barclays Center and the first housing tower, B2--including infrastructure, a platform and residential units."

In December, documents from parent Forest City Enterprises, including a Form 8-K and a Form 10-Q submitted to the SEC, plus three press releases, similarly said the pending joint venture would exclude the Barclays Center and B2.

Not quite.

While the Greenland Group won't own any of the arena--the operating arm of which is owned 55% by Forest City and 45% by Brooklyn Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov--it will play a crucial role regarding the roof.

From the Final Scope; click to enlarge
Role revealed

On 2/7/14, ESD let slip some information about the roof, in the Final Scope for a Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement, a pending, court-ordered review of the potential community impact of the 25-year buildout ESD quietly approved--but didn't disclose--in 2009.

The Final Scope noted that the planned joint venture, which is still subject to some regulatory approvals, would address all buildings going forward, complete construction of the new LIRR rail yard, build the platform over the rail yard to achieve vertical development, create the planned eight acres of publicly accessible open space, "and make certain modifications to the Barclays Center roof."

What does it mean?

What does "certain modifications" mean? I initially speculated that the changes could regard integration with towers yet to be built, or better sound insulation, or even a new Greenland logo to accompany the Barclays Center one.

My query to ESD was met with the one-line response regarding "architectural and environmental attributes."

So I wouldn't bet that integration with the towers or a new logo are on the table.

But an enhanced (green?) roof could be a two-fer for Forest City Ratner: they could present it as an environmental and esthetic boost, while aiming to fix a pesky problem.

I'll bet Forest City plays down the latter, since it would acknowledge a significant flaw in the arena design. Maybe that's why they omitted the roof revamp in those initial statements about the Greenland deal.

Local impact?

The time to perfect the roof, of course, was when the arena is under construction. Depending on the size and scale of the roof revamp, the work could require disruption on the sidewalks, arena plaza, and/or adjacent streets.

If so, that'll be another Atlantic Yards element--like the impact of the escaping bass--neither disclosed nor acknowledged in any phase of the environmental review.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.