Skip to main content

NBA says it has no problem with Prokhorov's presidential run; will he simply be seen as the Nets' owner, or also as a beneficiary of sweetheart deals?

So, as the New York Daily News put it, Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov announces run for president of Russia. Or, in the New York Post, Nets tycoon Prokhorov to run for Russian presidency. Or, in the Times, Billionaire to Oppose Putin in Russian Presidential Election.

Now there's nothing wrong with Prokhorov challenging the autocratic Putin. But the frame is off.

Prokhorov may be best known for being the majority owner of the Nets, but he's also (as noted by me last year, and DDDB today) the beneficiary of eminent domain, tax breaks, and other special governmental favor.

Prokhorov owns 80% of the team, 45% of the arena, and has an option for 20% of the project.

In other words, as the arena opening approaches,  every decision by New York City and New York State to not demand more from the arena operators--more mitigations, more explanations, more traffic agents-- is a decision that boosts Prokhorov's bottom line.

Did I mention that he's also worth some $18 billion? He can afford it.

So too can his partner Forest City Ratner.

NBA: no problem

According to MarketWatch, the NBA says "a political career — even being head of state — is no impediment to owning a team."

That's very interesting. Wouldn't someone cry foul if, say, Mitt Romney bought the New Orleans Hornets--the league wants to sell it--to boost his career? 

Owning a team has already boosted Prokhorov's image, and might well boost his career.

And what's to stop a politically minded owner from using his team, however it seems benign, to promote his political reputation? Say, a barnstorming tour through Russia. Or an effort to recruit support from Russian-Americans, and thus their relatives back home.

It's curious that NBA was willing to step in and stop a trade (maybe two) of Hornets guard Chris Paul. But Prokhorov, who's entering uncharted territory as an owner, is just fine. Until and unless he makes the league look bad.

From the Times


A New York Times sports reporter addressed the issue whimsically:
Indeed, as league officials noted, the Milwaukee Bucks’ owner, Herb Kohl, has been a United States senator since 1988, taking office three years after he bought the team.

But it would be unusual, to say the least, for a professional sports franchise in the United States to be owned by a powerful world leader. It could also pose challenges to the Nets. Prokhorov is already an absentee owner, attending few games and making rare appearances in the New York area on his team’s behalf.

The Nets need attentive leadership now more than ever as they prepare to move to Brooklyn from New Jersey while trying to build a contending team around Deron Williams, their star guard.

It seems unlikely that Prokhorov would miss a Kremlin meeting to attend an N.B.A. board of governors meeting. His political duties might prevent any recruiting trips to see Dwight Howard or to coax Williams into staying.

Or, perhaps, it would make Prokhorov’s mystique that much more powerful.

Comments

  1. "It's curious that NBA was willing to step in and stop a trade (maybe two) of Hornets guard Chris Paul. But Prokhorov, who's entering uncharted territory as an owner, is just fine. Until and unless he makes the league look bad."



    Wow, way to compare apples and oranges.

    The NBA owns the Hornets, at least until it finds a buyer interested to keep the team in New Orleans (and it appears there could be one) and in order to sell the team they need to make it palatable to a potential new ownership. So they needed to make a trade that was in the best interest of the Hornets team, and the trade with the Clippers was much more palatable than the one with the Lakers..maybe not short-term but long-term for sure, which is what could lure much more easily someone to purchase the team. A long-term project.

    The whole Prokhorov thing is totally different....from the way you speak you don't seem enthusiastic over the NBA having no problem with someone running for president.

    The owner can also be an absentee one since the ones making the decisions are the basketball people he hires. He relies to them.

    And, really, it wouldn't even be the first time a (potential) head of state owns a sports team. Silvio Berlusconi, now former Italian Prime Minister, has owned the AC Milan soccer team for decades, during his presidency included. His political presidency was pure crap but his soccer team was run greatly.

    Plus, Prokhorov wants to both run for president and own the Nets. Why forcing him to sell the team?

    Just because you don't seem to like Prokhorov doesn't mean the NBA should force him to sell the team if he wants to run for President.


    Why Prokhorov could make the league look bad if he gets elected? What the frick do his political decisions in Russia even have to do with the NBA? Russia and the NBA/Nets are separate things. I don't see why the way he decides to run Russia could make the NBA look bad. The NBA and Russian politics are two separate things.

    Going back to Berlusconi, he run the country like crap but his presidency didn't make AC Milan, his soccer team, and the Italian soccer league at-large look bad.

    Way to overblow things out of proportion, Atlantic Yards Report.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brave anonymous commenter, you didn't read what I wrote: "And what's to stop a politically minded owner from using his team, however it seems benign, to promote his political reputation?"

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.