Skip to main content

Deconstructing Marty Markowitz on Atlantic Yards blame (it's all the fault of lawsuits), residential permit parking, and his claim of being underpaid

In a recent interview by Roberto Perez on The Perez Notes, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz gave what likely will remain his standard line on Atlantic Yards: it all would've worked out if there had been no lawsuits.

Well, that ignores the fact that developers of large, multi-phase projects must plan for up-and-down development cycles, and, as already noted by DDDB and NLG, developer Bruce Ratner admitted that his announced plan was never feasible.

The question

At 10:06, host Perez opened up the mike: "Borough President, talk a little bit about Atlantic Yards. There are both sides, of course, the people who are upset about eminent domain, people who are upset that the jobs, supposedly promised by Bruce Ratner have not materialized, and the job training, and the people that are upset over gentrification. Talk about some of the positives of the project, and what do you think of the overall so far, there's a lot of development left that's part of the final project that hasn't happened just yet."

The answer

Markowitz took to it like catnip: "Well, let me just say that, if the folks that opposed this hadn't tied the project up for seven years in litigation, Atlantic Yards, a good piece of it would have been built. The affordable housing would've been on its way. The Nets would be playing in the arena and defeating the Manhattan Knicks. I'm sure, I'm confident. And people would've been working, and it would've been the jobs that were promised. Because when this project was first proposed, the economy was strong in new York and in America. Sadly, seven years of lawsuits that sucked up time, money, and everything else and then we get into the middle of a deep recession."

Wait, the developer originally promised 10,000 office jobs in four office tower. That was bogus from the start. Now there's one office tower planned.

Damning the critics

"Listen, now the critics are complaining that there's not enough jobs," Markowitz continued. "Before, they couldn't care less about the jobs. They couldn't care less about the jobs. they couldn't care less about affordable housing."

Actually, critics and opponents backed alternative plans for development, which would've produced jobs and affordable housing. And some of those now protesting (and suing) the developer for false promises about jobs were long project supporters.

Eminent domain

"Let me tell you, the folks that were impacted with eminent domain,, overwhelmingly, most of them did very well in terms of accepting the package from the developer and relocating and finding good places to live," Markowitz said.

Well, homeowners did much better than renters. And the "package from the developer" was paid, in large part, by the public. Beyond that, Forest City Ratner gained the benefit of a state override of zoning--essentially a private rezoning--allowing a much larger development to be built.

"I must tell you, the developer, the owner, did not start off wanting to throw people out of their homes, that was never the case," Markowitz said. "They tried every configuration. And this was the very best configuration in this time frame."

What? It was the best configuration for Ratner's purposes. For example, the plot 100 feet east of Sixth Avenue between Dean and Pacific Streets was needed, initially, for staging and temporary parking.

Criticizing the "gentrifiers"

"So, they can complain all they want," Markowitz continued. "I'm hopeful that, once the buildout is completed over the next decade or so that the jobs promised will be delivered. And people will be working in and around the arena,. People will have affordable housing, which is promised, and by the way, the folks that are the loudest complainers, some could argue, are the gentrifiers, because the homes they bought were formerly--the folks that were in their homes were of low and moderate incomes. And they came in--and by the way, I have no problem with them coming in and helping to flourish neighborhoods, which I think is fabulous, but the truth be told, when Atlantic Yards is fully built out, the promised amount of affordable housing will preserve income and ethnic diversity, rather than gentrify it totally, that's the beauty of the project. From Day One, all of us insisted, and to the credit of Forest City Ratner, they wanted from Day One for the project to reflect the population in New York, which means people of means, affluent, as well as working class folks. And that's what Atlantic Yards will represent in the days to come."

Gentrifiers or not, the loudest complainers are the neighbors and, as noted on Atlantic Yards Watch, they have a lot to complain about.

Would Markowitz prefer a development, as with Yankee Stadium, where residents are pressured by just keeping afloat that they struggle to exercise civic obligations?

Also, Forest City now says that affordable housing as promised wasn't feasible.

The lure of the arena

"And the naysayers, they'll be among the first customers in the Barclays Center," Markowitz continued. "They may say no right now, I'm never gonna walk in, but as soon as they have children, or if they have children, and the Ice Capades are there, and the circus, and all the other great events you used to have to leave Brooklyn to enjoy, they'll have it within a few steps from where they live."

I think he's got a point--some "naysayers" will attend arena events with their kids. And for others, it will leave a bad taste in their mouths.

The parking issue

Perez asked Markowitz about permit parking, which several Atlantic Yards-area officials recommend as a solution to the inevitable scramble for parking around the arena site in Prospect Heights and adjacent neighborhoods.

"I have significant reservations about permit parking," responded Markowitz. "I don't think it can work here. If you do it for one neighborhood, no matter what justification, every other neighborhood in Brooklyn will say, We got something special too, we want resident parking. And before we know it, you've got a problem on your hand."

Well, even the city Department of Transportation thinks the issue is worth studying around huge parking magnets like the Brooklyn arena and Yankee Stadium.

"You'd be surprised how many families in Brooklyn have more than one car, have two cars," he continued. "So I don't know how you're going to regulate it, I don't know how you're going to control it. Of course it could be a great way for the city of New York to raise more money."

"Now, is there a legitimate concern about traffic patterns around Atlantic Yards? Listen, from Day One, of all the arguments concerning Atlantic Yards, I would say the most legitimate one was the issue of traffic and parking," he said. "I know they've got some of the best traffic engineers in the country. I know that the Department of Transportation works closely with the developer."

Dissing the DOT

Then he got on his soapbox: "And by the way, they are no friends of automobiles, this current Department of Transportation...  as you know, much of our parking has been taken away for bike lines. As long as the current administration is in office, they'll continue to take away parking to make more room for bike lanes."

That's a slight exaggeration.

Then Markowitz offered some veiled class antagonism: "I'm kind of surprised that this would be an issue, in the area around Atlantic Yards, that they're concerned about parking. I'm surprised to hear that."

They're concerned about parking because an arena is placed in a residential neighborhood.

Maximizing parking?

"But the truth of the matter is that, listen, anything we can do, and I fully support ensuring that we maximize the amount of parking, because people in Brooklyn still significantly need their automobiles for many different reasons, and we should not decrease the amount of parking available."

Actually, the issue with Atlantic Yards is maximizing incentives for people to take public transportation.

"I know there are committees meeting, right here at Borough Hall," he said. "Carlo Scissura, my senior advisor just had a meeting over this very issue of traffic and parking."

Yes, and neighbors and Council Member Letitia James were troubled about the lack of a promised transportation demand management plan, among other things.

"But understand that overwhelmingly the folks that have that concern opposed that project from Day One," Markowitz said. "They don't want the arena, they don't want the housing. They don't want the project, period. Now they gotta deal with reality."

Yes, the reality is that the state overrode local zoning to impose what architect Frank Gehry called a project that is "out of scale with the existing area."

"Hopefully there is reasonableness. And I think it is absolutely reasonable," Markowitz closed, "I feel the same way, I don't want to see the traffic pattern as such that it causes gridlock there, because, ultimately the success of the arena depends upon the ability to move people in and out quickly. If folks are gonna be in gridlock, and they can't move, the arena will not succeed, and we want it to succeed."

Living wage?

Those listening to the interview would hear Markowitz asked about a bill requiring a living wage for workers in city-subsidized development projects.

"I have some questions about the living wage," Markowitz responded, then donned his "man of the people" mantle. "Listen, if it was up to me, everybody should be making $100,000 a year or more. I wish I got paid more, by the way, Borough Presidents don't get paid a lot of money."

Markowitz earns $160,000.

"The truth of the matter is, however, we live in a free, capitalistic system, we have minimum wage rules, which is a necessary thing.. I think it is quite appropriate for the national government... I don't know if the state can do it independently from the feds."

Yes, states can set their own minimum wage laws.

Markowitz called it an entry-level position but produced an anecdote about how he met an entry-level worker who, four years later, had been promoted to manager of a large store retail section.

That works for some people, but not necessarily for most.

Comments

  1. 160k and he's underpaid? what a tool. that guy makes my blood boil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:33 PM

      Wait until Markowitz is termed limited out as Brooklyn Borough President and ends up on the payroll of Forest City Ratner or Barclays Center as vice-president or something for "community relations" at $200,000 to $300,000 per year as what Ralph Nader has termed a deferred bribe. Markowitz is one of the sorriest--and broadly speaking--corrupt elected officials (State Senator and now Borough President)in long memory.

      Delete
  2. Don't worry, Marty, I don't have a car. So they can have my parking spot for the bike lanes. Mine and the majority of Brooklynites who also don't have a car.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sarah -- he also has three drivers on call for 16 hours a day; at a taxpayer cost of $177K/year.

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/driven_to_excess_JK3Hww4bDKlX0LJWQ2IDAJ

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.