Skip to main content

Another look at the huge benefits from the EB-5 program: perhaps (updated) $128 million to Forest City Ratner, and $36 million to NYCRC

Update 9/25/12: the total loan, it has since been reported, was $228 million, which is 8.43% less than $249 million. Thus, an 8.43% cut on $140 million would mean a decline of $11.8 million, leading to a total of $128 million.

So, how much if Forest City Ratner saving on its $249 million low-interest loan from immigrant investors under the EB-5 program? And what are the earnings of is the New York City Regional Center (NYCRC), the private investment pool that was marketing the project--green cards in exchange for $500,000 in purportedly job-creating investments?

I have to revise some of my reporting from last year, when I calculated a gain of some $191 million to Forest City, based on the difference between the interest rate the developer might have to pay on the open market and the no-interest being offered to Chinese investors.

I also have to revise my calculations regarding benefits to the NYCRC, which I calculated would earn $38,000 per client in fees, or nearly $19 million.

Earning money on the interest

Rather, the NYCRC may be keeping very little of those fees, since it has to share fees with affiliates. It earns its money on the spread between the interest rate on loan offered to Forest City and the return received by the 498 investors.

Forest City likely will pay 4% to 5%, as with other NYCRC projects promoted by the city, while the majority of the investors, from China, will get no interest, and the 40 or so Korean investors will get .25%.

So it's a win for Forest City and the NYCRC: they both make money. I think Forest City's benefit is still more than $100 million, while NYCRC may earn some $50 million (see bottom).

It's a win for the immigrants: they get green cards for themselves and their family, with the cost being the foregone interest on the investment they get back. (Of course there is a risk, and not every EB-5 investor gets a green card.)

What about the public benefit? The investments are supposed to create jobs, but in some case--as I've shown with the Atlantic Yards investment--they don't create new jobs, and the immigrant investors get credit--apparently legal, though logically questionable--for the jobs created by the entire $1.448 billion in the "Brooklyn Arena and Infrastructure Project."

New sources

Insights come from a purportedly confidential NYCRC offering memorandum ( for the $60 million Brooklyn Navy Yard project, posted on a Chinese web site and dated 10/2/09, and an offering memorandum for the NYCRC's $65 million Steiner Studios project, posted on a Russian web site and dated 5/1/10.

The offering memorandum for the Brooklyn Arena and Infrastructure Project has not surfaced, but I assume it shares similarities with the other two, though it's surely not a direct copy.

For each of the initial two projects, each investor had to pay $530,000, which includes a $30,000 fee to the NYCRC, presumably a portion of which went to affiliate agents in China and elsewhere. For the Brooklyn Arena project, the fee was $38,000.

Interest rates

The NYCRC apparently earns money not merely via the fees, but by a spread between the interest rate delivered to the investors and the interest rate charged to the borrower.

As noted in the RFPs for current city projects, the interest rates for city-sponsored project is 4%-5%, likely less than half the rate available on the open market.

The Navy Yard loan was advanced at 3%--likely a low interest rate because it was the NYCRC's first project. The Steiner Studios loan was at 4.45%. Likely the Brooklyn Arena loan is closer to the latter.

The distribution

The Brooklyn Navy Yard memorandum states:
Subject to any adjustment required as determined by the Manager for the expenses, liabilities and other obligations of the Company, the Company will make distributions of the net cash proceeds realized from the interest payments from Investments (the “Interest Income”) to the Members promptly after the end of each calendar quarter to the extent available, as follows: eighty percent (80%) among all Members in proportion to their respective Membership Units owned as of the distribution date and twenty percent
(20%) to the Manager.
For Steiner Studios, the distribution was 50% to the Member, and 50% to the Manager.

But the adjustments, including a management fee, cut down significantly on any potential interest.

Management fee

The Navy Yard memorandum states:
The Company will pay the Manager an annual management fee in the amount equal to the product of $7,000 and the number of Membership Units outstanding (the “Management Fee”).
That works out to 1.4%.

For the Steiner Studios project, the management fee is be 2.2% of the Investment Portion ($500,000) of each Membership Unit, or $11,000 a year.

Steiner disclosure: no income

This was in the Steiner memorandum but not the initial Navy Yard one:

Additionally, during the initial term of the Loan, after payment of the Management Fee, the Manager’s portion of Interest Income and certain expenses, it is likely that there will not be any or any significant interest income to Members. 
Surely this clause, or a variant much like it, appeared in the Offering Memorandum for the Brooklyn Arena project.

How much does Forest City save?

Consider, for example, that Forest City would save more than $140 million if it paid no interest while the regular financing rate is 6.5% (but it's not), as reported last year.


What if it's paying 4.5% interest? Well, the typical interest rate available for non-recourse financing was 12%. That's a 7.5% spread, and thus leaves some wiggle room.

If Forest City is saving 6.5%, it's likely saving some $140 million. If the spread is smaller, the savings likely are still more than $100 million.

How much does NYCRC earn?

Let's say NYCRC earns 4% a year on an investment of $249 million. That's some $10 million a year, or $50 million over five years.

(Update: On $228 million, that would be closer to $36 million.)

Nice work if you can get it.

Job creation

Both memoranda assure potential investors that an economist has calculated that the project would create sufficient jobs to pass muster, but at the same time warns that the economist's report has not otherwise been verified.

The Navy Yard memorandum states:
The Manager, through Company, has partnered with BNYDC to fund a key phase of the Navy Yard’s redevelopment plans. The Company expects to provide a Loan of up to $60 million to BNYDC to facilitate (i) the refurbishment and expansion of a 215,000 square foot industrial building for green manufacturing (the “Green Manufacturing Center”); (ii) the construction of a new 89,000 square foot industrial building (the “Sands Building”); and (iii) a broad range of related infrastructure improvements throughout the Navy Yard. The Loan is expected to be combined with approximately $81 million funding from the New York City, New York State, and the U.S. federal government for an aggregate project budget of up to approximately $141 million.
The Manager has engaged Dr. Michael K. Evans, Chairman of Evans, Carroll & Associates, an economist who specializes in EB-5 immigration analysis and economic impact studies of development projects and new construction, to conduct a job creation analysis of the Project. According to the report, the Project is expected to create in excess of 1,300 jobs. Neither the Company nor the Manager has undertaken any independent investigation to confirm the accuracy of such report.
The Steiner memorandum states:
The Company expects to provide a Loan of up to $65 million to the Borrower, 25 WA Associates, LLC, an affiliate of Steiner Studios, to facilitate (i) the renovation of the Building, a 235,000 sq. ft., seven-story building located adjacent to Steiner Studios’ current facility that will convert the Building into new film, television and commercial production facilities; (ii) the construction of five new film, television and commercial soundstages; and (iii) the construction of a 110,000 sq. ft. parking facility to accommodate increased car traffic into Steiner Studios (items (i)-(iii), the “Approved Improvements”). The Loan will be combined with $10 million of funding from the City of New York in connection with electrical substation upgrades, $3 million from the BNYDC, and $2 million from the United States Economic Development Administration to perform environmental remediation and interior demolition of the Building, for an aggregate Project budget of up to $80 million. In addition, pursuant to the requirements of the Loan Agreement, the Borrower shall be required at all times to contribute not less than 10% of the Qualified Investment portion of the Project’s cost (inclusive of interest service on the Loan and operational costs). As noted, the City of New York has pledged up to $10 million to the Navy Yard to upgrade an electrical substation adjacent to Steiner Studios that will provide increased electrical output needed for expansion of the film, television and commercial studios. 
...The Manager has engaged Dr. Michael K. Evans, Chairman of Evans, Carroll & Associates, an economist who specializes in EB-5 immigration analysis and economic impact studies of development projects and new construction, to conduct a job creation analysis of the Project. According to the report, the Project is expected to create 1,648 EB-5 eligible jobs from the construction and operation of the expanded Steiner Studios. Neither the Company nor the Manager has undertaken any independent investigation to confirm the accuracy of such report.

Comments

  1. Anonymous4:38 PM

    Incredible depth on this site, should be a new category of Pulitzers. FYI the "NYCRC's $65 million Steiner Studios project, posted on a Russian web site" link is down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, sometimes documents in the EB-5 world do not persist after a project has gone through a cycle.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Barclays Center event June 11 to protest plans to expand Israeli draft; questions about logistics

At right is a photo of a poster spotted in Hasidic Williamsburg right. Clearly there's an event scheduled at the Barclays Center aimed at the Haredi Jewish community (strict Orthodox Jews who reject secular culture), but the lack of English text makes it cryptic.

The website Matzav.com explains, Protest Against Israeli Draft of Bnei Yeshiva Rescheduled for Barclays Center:
A large asifa to protest the drafting of bnei yeshiva in Eretz Yisroel into the Israeli army that had been set to take place this month will instead be held on Sunday, 17 Sivan/June 11, at the Barclays Center in Downtown Brooklyn, NY. So attendees at a big gathering will protest an apparent change of policy that will make it much more difficult for traditional Orthodox Jewish students--both Hasidic (who follow a rebbe) and non-Hasidic (who don't)--to get deferments from the draft. Comments on the Yeshiva World website explain some of the debate.

The logistical questions

What's unclear is how large the ev…

Atlanta's Atlantic Yards moves ahead

First mentioned in April, the Atlantic Yards project in Atlanta is moving ahead--and has the potential to nudge Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn further down in Google searches.

According to a 5/30/17 press release, Hines and Invesco Real Estate Announce T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards:
Hines, the international real estate firm, and Invesco Real Estate, a global real estate investment manager, today announced a joint venture on behalf of one of Invesco Real Estate’s institutional clients to develop two progressive office projects in Atlanta totalling 700,000 square feet. T3 West Midtown will be a 200,000-square-foot heavy timber office development and Atlantic Yards will consist of 500,000 square feet of progressive office space in two buildings. Both projects are located on sites within Atlantic Station in the flourishing Midtown submarket.
Hines will work with Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (HPA) as the design architect for both T3 West Midtown and Atlantic Yards. DLR Group will be t…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Not quite the pattern: Greenland selling development sites, not completed condos

Real Estate Weekly, reporting on trends in Chinese investment in New York City, on 11/18/15 quoted Jim Costello, a senior vice president at research firm Real Capital Analytics:
“They’re typically building high-end condos, build it and sell it. Capital return is in a few years. That’s something that is ingrained in the companies that have been coming here because that’s how they’ve grown in the last 35 years. It’s always been a development game for them. So they’re just repeating their business model here,” he said. When I read that last November, I didn't think it necessarily applied to Atlantic Yards/Pacific Park, now 70% owned (outside of the Barclays Center and B2 modular apartment tower), by the Greenland Group, owned significantly by the Shanghai government.
A majority of the buildings will be rentals, some 100% market, some 100% affordable, and several--the last several built--are supposed to be 50% market/50% subsidized. (See tentative timetable below.)

Selling development …

"There is no alternative": DM Glen on de Blasio's affordable housing strategy

As I've written, Mayor Bill de Blasio sure knows how to steer and spin coverage of his affordable housing initiatives.

Indeed, his latest announcement, claiming significant progress, came with a pre-press release op-ed in the New York Daily News and then a friendly photo-op press conference with an understandably grateful--and very lucky--winner of an affordable housing lottery.

To me, though, the most significant quote came from Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen, who, as the Wall Street Journal reported:
said public housing had been “starved” of federal support for years now, leaving the city with fewer ways of creating affordable housing. “Are we relying too heavily on the private sector?” she said. “There is no alternative.” Though Glen was using what she surely sees as a common-sense phrase, it recalls the slogan of a politician with whom I doubt de Blasio identifies: former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a Conservative who believed in free markets.

It suggests the limits to …