Skip to main content

Fifth Annual Brooklyn Blogfest = first Absolut shillfest?

Oh, here's how Absolut recruited bloggers. Here's an report on the actual event.

As with the borough, the Brooklyn Blogfest sure has changed.

There's a lot of shilling for Absolut Brooklyn before the Fifth Annual Brooklyn Blogfest, which is sponsored by Absolut. And surely there will be more, thanks to Absolut's Brooklyn Stoop Life campaign, where "Bloggers Share Their Love for Brooklyn."

Absolut has generated sponsored blog posts as well as other posts that sure look like they're sponsored, since the bloggers have "been chosen to collaborate with Absolut Vodka, to celebrate Absolut Brooklyn."

Renaming Brooklyn

So let me suggest an update of John Pinamonti's classic Atlantic Yards elegy/fight song, "The Burrow."

Original version:
"It makes me mad/and it's such a pity/they're trying to rename Brooklyn/Forest City"
My update:
"It makes me mad/and for so little loot/they're trying to rename Brooklyn/Absolut"
Absolut accountability

Yes, as I wrote after last year's Blogfest, the disparate blogs of Brooklyn all have their role.

But relatively few people in the “bloggiest place in America” provide what we need most: solid civic information, "holding institutions accountable on a daily basis," to quote author, The Wire creator, and former reporter David Simon.

Still true. Absolut-ly.

Comments

  1. Thanks for the link to my video post, Mr. Oder on the "that sure look like they're sponsored" tab. I wonder if you are familiar with my blog beyond this. I'm betting, no. It's http://sogood.tv, please click around.

    Just to be clear, Absolut DID NOT SPONSOR this video or any other on my blog, no one has. I'm a filmmaker as well as a chef, and my partner and I crank out good quality on our OWN COIN, thank you very much. I have no advertisers and make a SMALL bit of change on YouTube as a content partner. A quick email could have confirmed this, but you only implied otherwise so no need to double check. Forgive the snark, but I'm feeling offended.

    So in full disclosure, I got one bottle of Vodka at the time of shooting, I later received a flip. There is some promise I'll be on their facebook page. Frankly many of my subscribers assumed I was actually getting real money for this. But, true, I did not detail my big windfall. Won't happen again, that's for sure. Always a pleasure to feel community support from fellow bloggers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolut engaged bloggers to promote the new vodka, in part by promising certain goodies. That's what I meant by posts that sure look like they're sponsored, and I take your belated disclosure as a recognition that there was a connection regarding that specific post.

    It doesn't mean you get rich off it. Nor does it mean that your blog isn't valuable. Nor does it mean that your blog is sponsored by Absolut. It's just an example of Absolut's "viral, underground" marketing strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I never ever implied there was NOT a connection to the vodka. I stated in my video that I was working with Absolut. Work means compensation. Which are certain "goodies" in this case. My "belated disclosure" was of the details NOT the connection.

    I'm still not sure what you are trying to establish here.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Heather, I'm sure you think I'm splitting hairs here, but "chosen to work with" and "chosen to collaborate with" is pretty ambiguous.

    You could've won a contest, or lottery, rather than be part of their viral marketing.

    It's a well-done video.

    I'll point to today's post to elaborate my general concerns:
    http://atlanticyardsreport.blogspot.com/2010/06/absolut-and-authenticity.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. I surely could have been clearer, but that this is in line with Brooklyner or the Barclay's Center? Really, Mr. Oder? I despise both.

    I disagree about contests. They are just another way huge corporations get content, and sometimes quality content, for free. Totally exploitive. Even if every contestant got a free flip, I would not have entered on principal.

    I chose to be part of the viral marketing, your term not mine, in a spirit of community with the Blogfest (I like Louise and what she does) and because saying I was working with Absolut offers my small blog a little credibility in the broader context of YouTube. I NEVER intended to imply there was no compensation or gain for me.

    Now if I said I discovered this wonderful product that I could make Sangria and Barbecue sauce (next video) with no mention of a collaboration or working relationship, that would be some seriously inauthentic viral marketing, but I didn't. I do think intention counts here.

    Obviously, I too, can split hairs. Thanks, hj

    ReplyDelete
  6. Heather,

    Yes, intention counts. I didn't suggest that what any individual blogger did was in line with Brooklyner or the Barclays Center.

    But, as I wrote, I do think that the overall Absolut marketing effort aims (in an underhanded way) at authenticity, just as do the suite-marketers at the arena and those trying to imply that the Brooklyner is located in a brownstone neighborhood.

    The term "viral, underground effort" comes from Absolut's marketing letter.

    I'll stand by what I wrote: "Blogfest organizers should've provided some leadership. And bloggers in general are getting a reminder that even if they don't think of themselves as journalists they may have some ethical responsibilities."

    That doesn't make anyone evil. Nor does it mean they're not well-intentioned. It just means they should think things through.

    There's a lot of celebration at the Blogfest. It's a fun party for a lot of people.

    For years, though, some participants have raised questions as to whether the Blogfest--or another event--would provide an opportunity for bloggers to confront some tough questions about things like commenting, fact-gathering, and conflict-of-interest.

    See Benjamin Kabak's post from May 2008:
    http://www.benjaminkabak.com/blog/2008/05/14/a-meeting-of-the-blogging-minds-but-to-what-end/

    ReplyDelete
  7. You should stand by your statement re ethical responsibilities, it is accurate. However I think the issue was one of disorganization and ignorance and not a matter of being underhanded. I should have been more clear and not made assumptions about my audience's understanding of the situation. I can't pass that buck to anyone.

    And yes, I have lots to say about blogging that hasn't been addressed at Blogfest, I actually backed up what Kuntzman said on the mike at Blogfest 2008. I spoke right after he did.

    But, in defense of Blogfest, as someone who has volunteered and organized more than her fair share, (PTA,SLT,etc) I hesitate to bring it up, lest I'm heading up yet another labor of love. She is putting in the work, not me. I respect that. Thanks for the exchange. Take care, hj

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barclays Center/Levy Restaurants hit with suit charging discrimination on disability, race; supervisors said to use vicious slurs, pursue retaliation

The Daily News has an article today, Barclays Center hit with $5M suit claiming discrimination against disabled, while the New York Post headlined its article Barclays Center sued over taunting disabled employees.

While that's part of the lawsuit, more prominent are claims of racial discrimination and retaliation, with black employees claiming repeated abuse by white supervisors, preferential treatment toward Hispanic colleagues, and retaliation in response to complaints.

Two individual supervisors, for example, are charged with  referring to black employees as “black motherfucker,” “dumb black bitch,” “black monkey,” “piece of shit” and “nigger.”

Two have referred to an employee blind in one eye as “cyclops,” and “the one-eyed guy,” and an employee with a nose disorder as “the nose guy.”

There's been no official response yet though arena spokesman Barry Baum told the Daily News they, but take “allegations of this kind very seriously” and have "a zero tolerance policy for…

Behind the "empty railyards": 40 years of ATURA, Baruch's plan, and the city's diffidence

To supporters of Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project, it's a long-awaited plan for long-overlooked land. "The Atlantic Yards area has been available for any developer in America for over 100 years,” declared Borough President Marty Markowitz at a 5/26/05 City Council hearing.

Charles Gargano, chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, mused on 11/15/05 to WNYC's Brian Lehrer, “Isn’t it interesting that these railyards have sat for decades and decades and decades, and no one has done a thing about them.” Forest City Ratner spokesman Joe DePlasco, in a 12/19/04 New York Times article ("In a War of Words, One Has the Power to Wound") described the railyards as "an empty scar dividing the community."

But why exactly has the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Vanderbilt Yard never been developed? Do public officials have some responsibility?

At a hearing yesterday of the Brooklyn Borough Board Atlantic Yards Committee, Kate Suisma…

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

So, Forest City has some property subject to the future Gowanus rezoning

Writing yesterday, MAP: Who Owns All the Property Along the Gowanus Canal, DNAinfo's Leslie Albrecht lays out the positioning of various real estate players along the Gowanus Canal, a Superfund site:
As the city considers whether to rezone Gowanus and, perhaps, morph the gritty low-rise industrial area into a hot new neighborhood of residential towers (albeit at a fraction of the height of Manhattan's supertall buildings), DNAinfo reviewed property records along the canal to find out who stands to benefit most from the changes.
Investors have poured at least $440 million into buying land on the polluted waterway and more than a third of the properties have changed hands in the past decade, according to an examination of records for the nearly 130 properties along the 1.8-mile canal. While the single largest landowner is developer Property Markets Group, other landowners include Kushner Companies, Alloy Development, Two Trees, and Forest City New York.

Forest City's plans unc…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…