Skip to main content

Justice Friedman limits oral argument to issue of whether case involving Development Agreement should be transferred to Gerges in Brooklyn

Yesterday, I asked: will the Atlantic Yards Development Agreement--which gives far longer deadlines than officially proclaimed when the project was approved--get its day in court?

Well, it didn't happen today and it's looking less likely (though not impossible).

In a hearing that lasted little more than 20 minutes, Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman limited argument in the case, known as Peter Williams Enterprises, et al., vs. New York State Urban Development Corporation (aka Empire State Development Corporation, or ESDC), to questions of venue--whether the case even belonged in her court.

Her announcement at the start perked up ESDC attorney Philip Karmel and left the 15 or so project opponents in the audience somewhat frustrated. (Also in the audience, a few attorneys for Forest City Ratner, the meter ticking.)

Should she agree that it does, rather than move the case to a condemnation judge in Brooklyn who has ruled without question in the ESDC's favor, she'll then entertain arguments on the merits of the case.

(Sketch via Michael D.D. White's Noticing New York blog, which offers further commentary on the proceedings.)

In dispute

The plaintiffs argue that the ESDC should not have relied on the 2006 Determination and Findings (D&F) to exercise eminent domain but instead should have issued a new D&F describing the public use to be served by the project as of 2010, given that the Development Agreement, among other documents, points to a much longer buildout.

The ESDC says the case belongs before Supreme Court Justice Abraham Gerges because, should the plaintiffs prevail, it would affect the transfer of title he already approved.

If relief is granted, Karmel told the court, the ESDC would not be able to continue with the condemnation process--specifically removing two companies owned by Henry Weinstein from possession (though no longer ownership) of lots and a building at the corner of Carlton and Vanderbilt avenues.

It also "would serve judicial economy," Karmel said, "all the issues have already been argued before Justice Gerges." (He didn't exactly grapple with the Development Agreement, however.)

Moreover, said Karmel, a notice of appeal has been filed with respect to Gerges's condemnation order, setting up a situation in which that appeal would be heard by a different appellate court than the one that would hear an appeal of Friedman's decision.

(That case hasn't been appealed yet. If it is, it would have to be filed by October.)

Petitioners' case

Matthew Brinckerhoff, attorney for the petitioners, noted that one of them, The Gelin Group, occupies a house on Dean Street slated to be subject to eminent domain at a later date, and was not the subject of Gerges's decision.

Friedman asked whether The Gelin Group had standing, since the ESDC had pointed out that the family represented is not the owner of the house. Brinckerhoff said he had an affidavit from the owner, who assigned his right to The Gelin Group to defend against eminent domain. (Karmel later disputed it, but Friedman said her ruling would not be based on the issue of standing.)

He noted that the ESDC did not file any motion to dismiss the case when it was first filed in January, but rather waited until Gerges's decision.

Friedman's other case

Friedman, who in January held oral argument on a challenge--based on the State Environmental Quality Review Act, or SEQRA--to the 2009 Modified General Project Plan brought by several community groups and dismissed the case in March, said, "This [new] case is certainly not related to the SEQRA case."

Given that motions have been filed for Friedman to rehear the latter case, again based on the Development Agreement, it is, arguably, and Brinckerhoff tried to say so.

"I don't think that this case in in any way related to the SEQRA challenge," responded Friedman, with world-weary skepticism. "This involves findings leading to condemnation. I see them as totally different."

Brinckerhoff added a layer of diplomacy. "I hear what the court is saying," he said.

Friedman allowed that he had a good-faith basis to say they're related, but she disagreed.

Brinckerhoff tried to make his point, but also returned to the argument that Gelin has every right to be in Friedman's court.

He also urged Friedman to consider the issue of "public perception" in moving the case to Brooklyn.

Karmel defended the ESDC's motion, saying that it was made in a timely manner, only after Gerges's decision on title complicated the case.

Bottom line

Friedman said she'd rule on the venue issue shortly and, should she keep the case in Manhattan, she'd schedule oral argument on the merits of the case within two weeks.

Brinckerhoff asked for one more bite at the apple. "The Gelin Group has absolutely the right to have its case heard here," he asserted.

Friedman, slightly peeved at Brinckerhoff for trying to squeeze in another argument, gave Karmel a chance to respond. He passed.

The other Williams case


Though Peter Williams has his name on the case heard today, he and two other plaintiffs, Daniel Goldstein and Freddy's Bar, left the case after reaching settlements regarding their property.

Brinckerhoff said afterward that a separate case involving an easement owned by Peter Williams is still pending.

However, that didn't stop the ESDC from declaring vacant possession, setting the stage for the transaction in which Russian billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov bought 80% of the team and 45% of the arena holding company.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.