Skip to main content

In last-minute lawsuit, owner of easement in arena block seeks to preclude claim of vacant possession; his goal is money, not to stop arena

Peter Williams, who owned an industrial building-turned-home (occupied by his two adult children, and a third person) in the Atlantic Yards arena block, settled weeks ago with Forest City Ratner.

Now he's brought an unusual lawsuit claiming that the state made a "colossal mistake" in not pursuing eminent domain for the easement bordering and above the Spalding Building at Sixth Avenue and Pacific Street. He acquired the easement in 2001 and owned adjacent 38 Sixth Avenue.

This could stop the Empire State Development Corporation and Forest City Ratner from claiming they have achieved "vacant possession" of the arena block when current occupants leave by Saturday.

The easement prevents anything more than four stories from being built at the corner of Sixth Avenue and Pacific Street--presumably precluding an arena.

(Photo and set by Tracy Collins)

ESDC response and impact

The ESDC, in turn, asserts that the record of the easement is merely "a mechanism used for tax billing purposes,” rather than “a separate property lot."

Should the case proceed, it could slow vacant possession of the arena block, which was presumed after May 7, paving the way for consummation of Forest City Ratner's deal to sell Russian billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov 80% of the New Jersey Nets and 45% of the Atlantic Yards arena.

Though the lawsuit raises the spectre of requiring a whole new process under the Eminent Domain Procedure Law (EDPL), Williams, a former plaintiff in the Atlantic Yards eminent domain cases, has not displayed a particular ideological bent. Rather, he's publicly said he's in it for the money.

All about easements

Here's some legal background on easements. Easements can be taken via eminent domain, though presumably they must be identified.

In New York City's Determination & Findings for the expansion of the 7 train, five subsurface easements were approved for eminent domain. The ESDC's Determination & Findings for Atlantic Yards doesn't mention Williams's easement.

The charges

According to a press release, Peter Williams Enterprises (PWE) filed suit in state Supreme Court in Kings County seeking a declaration of its ownership of the easement, identified as Block 1127, Lot 7501. (Other documents are embedded below.)

While the condominium lots at 24 Sixth Avenue were condemned by the New York State Urban Development Corporation (UDC), or ESDC, Lot 7501 was ignored.

Unmentioned is that, in both the federal and state eminent domain lawsuits, Williams's property was described as both a house at 38 Sixth Avenue and "an easement preventing building outside the current zoning envelope of the abutting property, 24 Sixth Avenue."

Failure of notice?

According to the press release:
Indeed, the UDC did not identify Lot 7501 in either its Notice of Public Hearing, pursuant to Article 2 of the EDPL, dated July 24, 2006 (the “Notice”), or its Determination and Findings, pursuant to EDPL § 204, dated December 8, 2006 (the “Determination”). Both the Notice and the Determination identified the property subject to acquisition by condemnation by block and lot. Both listed Lots 1001-1021 as the only lots UDC sought to acquire located at 24 Sixth Avenue. Both expressly provided that the “street addresses are included for ease of reference only,” and that in the “event of any inconsistency between the street addresses and the tax blocks and lots, the block and lot information shall control.” Because Lot 7501 was never identified, it cannot be, and has not been, taken eminent domain.
Attorney Matthew Brinckerhoff, who represented plaintiffs in the eminent domain cases, represents Williams. "If defendants want to acquire title to Lot 7501, they must do so through legal means," he said.

"The UDC must follow the procedures set forth in the EDPL; it must hold a public hearing to consider condemnation of Lot 7501 and thereafter issue the predicate findings and determination," he said. "It cannot simply take that which it does not own."

ESDC response

The complaint says the ESDC has not been cooperative:
In recent days, defendants have made it clear that, notwithstanding UDC’s undeniable failure to condemn one of the property tax lots necessary to allow Forest City Ratner to build an arena for its professional basketball team, it intends to proceed as if it owns property in [sic] plainly does not.
PWE wrote to attorneys for the defendants, advising of the facts. According to the complaint:
In the letter, the UDC claimed that its EDPL Determination “adequately identified the parcel by its former lot number before the condominium conversion occurred, the present condominium lot numbers and the street address,” and that the “Lot 7501 designation for this property is merely a mechanism used for tax billing purposes,” and “is not a separate property lot.”
I asked the ESDC today for comment but haven't heard back.

Williams's legal goal

Williams seeks a judgment in court:
By its letter, defendant UDC made it clear that it will not recognize PWE’s property and will thus continue with its plans to build a professional basketball arena on that property.

On information and belief, the UDC will soon declare—falsely—that it has “vacant possession” of the project site for the arena, including Lot 7501, thus triggering a cascade of events pursuant to various agreements.
Williams's ultimate goal

What next? In an AY-related segment of the April 30 Brian Lehrer Show, at about 18:50, Williams called in.



He explained that, when he settled regarding the sale of his property adjacent to Freddy's Bar & Backroom, "they purchased just my building... I have ownership of an easement… That easement has its own tax block and lot number; it was not taken."

Lehrer asked, "So, are you going to use this little claim that you may have to the easement rights to try and leverage delay in the whole project?"

"I’m a capitalist pig," Williams responded candidly. "All I want is money."

"You just diminished your bargaining position," Lehrer riposted.

Perhaps. But it's likely that he and Forest City Ratner are looking through the same type of lens.

Eric McClure of NoLandGrab comments: What's a few million when you could be a hero to millions? Don't forget, Ratner had your son thrown in jail — for taking one of Ratner's spycams off your own building!
Complaint by Peter Williams in Easement Case related to Atlantic Yards

Public Hearing Notice, July 24, 2006 regarding Atlantic Yards

Recorded Indenture for easement owned by Peter Williams

Comments

  1. This is certainly an interesting case. Have a new blog post up giving more background on air rights in eminent domain proceedings.

    Been following your blog for awhile, thanks for the continued updates on the Atlantic Yards project.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.