Skip to main content

Video: lawyer fighting condemnation for Atlantic Yards talks about case heard January 29 before Justice Gerges

After the hearing Friday in Kings County Supreme Court on eminent domain for Atlantic Yards, Matthew Brinckerhoff, attorney for those challenging eminent domain, answered a few questions at a brief press conference outside on Jay Street.



(Video courtesy of Michael Galinsky, who's working on the Battle of Brooklyn documentary.)

Expectations from hearing

Had he had expected Justice Abraham Gerges to transfer title, as had been sought by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) or had he expected the judge to put the condemnation on hold, as he did.

"I did not expect him to issue an order today; I would've been very surprised," responded Brinckerhoff, noting the flurry of legal arguments that had been submitted in just the past few days. "He has to at least consider in some way, shape, or form all the arguments we submitted.

The Leichter case

I pointed out that ESDC lawyer Charles Webb had told the judge that a case known as Leichter, regarding change in the plans for Times Square, controls the issue and that Brinckerhoff's clients had no case.

"He's really wrong about that," Brinckerhoff responded. "That's in the EDPL [Eminent Domain Procedure Law] 207 context. All that case says--it recognizes there can be some changes [in a plan]... If they had done their findings in December 2006 and three months later there were some changes, that alone wouldn't require them to start all over again."

"The question ultimately that that case doesn't address and no case addresses," he said, "is at what point do the changes become so significant that they have to result in an amended finding? As I said in court today, I think that we really can all agree that there is a point. What nobody knows is what that point is. Obviously I feel very strongly we've gone well past it over the course of the last four or five months, particularly in the past week."

(The latter was a reference to revelations, in the master closing documents, of extended deadlines and lenient demages for delays.)

New case

What about the additional case against the ESDC that was revealed in court, having been filed ten days earlier?

"That case is an Article 78 proceeding, filed on behalf of all the same entities and parties as I was representing today," Brinckerhoff said. "Basically, it's a defensive proceeding. We knew the ESDC was going to say today what it said... that 'you're in the wrong place.' As you heard today, we're happy to be in any place, and we're trying to be in every place."

"We feel some place should listen to us and actually rule on these arguments," he said. "If this court were to rule we're in the wrong place... we still have another place to go."

Procedural questions

What would happen if Gerges agreed to a transfer of title and Brinckerhoff's clients or project opponents win a case?

"This is like a proceduralist nightmare," Brinckerhoff said. "We would defnitely be in a court, seeking to have title transferred back."

He said that if his clients win the most recent case, or if Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn (DDDB) and other community groups win their case challenging the ESDC's approval of the 2009 Modified General Project Plan (pending before Justice Marcy Friedman), they will request--in some court--that the title be transferred back.

Candace Carponter, DDDB legal chair, pointed out the importance of addressing pending issues before title transfers, because that would lead to removing people from homes and businesses--well, not for at least three months--further demolition and then construction. So it could become meaningless.

"It could be a completely pyrrhic victory," Brinckerhoff added, saying that's why Gerges should decide, "because he's the one who's the trigger for the actual transfer of title."

Carponter said that, it's not unusual, "in the general scheme of litigation," for a judge to give time to get other issues decided before a ruling.

Fewer names

Brinckerhoff is only representing five or six people/businesses (in multiple entities), none of them residential renters. A couple of previously occupied buildings, according to a map shown in court, are now empty; one may have had renters who were plaintiffs in the eminent domain case. (I'll check.)

"The people I'm representing now are all the people who had a fee property interest that are therefore appropriate respondents in this case," Brinckerhoff said. "Residential tenants would not be."

Comments

  1. In our case before Judge Tolub, he ruled, and the Appellate Division affirmed, that rent regulated residential rental tenants are condemnees within the meaning of the EDPL law. No court had ever said that before.

    Therefore, residential rental tenants could properly be before Judge Gerges in the current vesting proceeding.

    This includes the residential rental tenants who are still on the site, but who appear to have no representation.

    Public Advocate DeBlasio - you are needed!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.