Skip to main content

Delia Hunley-Adossa's stealth candidacy for the 35th Council District; will there be a September push?

While candidates for open seats in the 33rd and 39th Council Districts are eagerly debating with and even sniping at each other, in the 35th District, the main challenger--who has championed Forest City Ratner's Atlantic Yards project but has avoided questions about it--is playing very hard to get, as the New York Times's blog The Local reported yesterday.

[Update: Hunley-Adossa finally talked to The Local, but didn't say much, though she did defer to her campaign manager about participating in an online Town Hall. Note that this allows candidates to answer questions in writing, rather than (more vulnerably) in real-time. Ok, she will participate.]

So, what to make of the stealth campaign of Delia Hunley-Adossa, known for her work as president of 88th Precinct Community Council and her questionable ties to the Atlantic Yards project? Perhaps because of the latter, she's avoiding the press and public debates. But is that the way to win a Council seat held by incumbent Letitia James, who won her last primary with 84% of the vote?

I don't think so. I doubt even the AY-loving Daily News could legitimately endorse her after her unwillingness to subject herself to public scrutiny.

Has Hunley-Adossa given up, concluding that the political fight is not for her? Maybe, but I doubt it. Perhaps she'll pour her remaining resources into a final push during the week before the election--remember (pro-AY candidate) Tracy Boyland's stealth campaign in 2006 for (anti-AY) Velmanette Montgomery's state Senate seat.

And Hunley-Adossa or her allies just might gin up a mini-scandal involving James, to be leaked in that final week to the Courier-Life's notorious Stephen Witt, who in the spring broke the news that James was late on her tax bill.

It was a legitimate (if overblown) story, but no one has asked Hunley-Adossa the more important question she wouldn't answer in March: does her dubious organization Brooklyn Endeavor Experience (BEE), a signatory of the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) get money from Forest City Ratner? (Answer, as FCR executive MaryAnne Gilmartin revealed July 22: all CBA signatories are funded by the developer.)

Among the other unanswered questions:
  • what environmental expertise does Hunley-Adossa have to run BEE, which aims to address green issues?
  • why has BEE distributed more money in compensation to Hunley-Adossa than it has spent on program services?
  • why does half the BEE board consist of Hunley-Adossa family members?
  • how does she feel about MCing rallies for Forest City Ratner, as she did in June 2008, taking direction from the developer's staff?
(Photo by Adrian Kinloch, who also shot video excerpted by The Local at top.)

"Have You Seen This Woman"?

The Local looked into Hunley-Adossa's mysterious campaign in a piece, as the screenshot above indicates, headlined The Day: Have You Seen This Woman?

Though Hunley-Adossa has spent $23,392 and raised $22,585, according to her latest campaign finance filing, she wouldn't return calls to The Local, her friends and supporters wouldn't comment, and her rivals, incumbent James and longshot Medhanie Estiphanos, said they hadn't seen her lately. The Brooklyn Paper has also run into roadblocks.

James's campaign Tweeted a response: "wondering where the transparency is," with a link to the story in The Local.

Questions coming

The Local plans an online town hall, with readers' questions aimed at the candidates; James and Estiphanos "pledged their participation without hesitation." The Local points to Hunley-Adossa's presence at the July 29 public hearing on Atlantic Yards; I noted that she didn't mention her candidacy when she testified.

The Local did do some sleuthing:
Her campaign Web site doesn’t even show up in the first 100 results of a Google search of her name.....

We found her Web site only by combing through Facebook, where she has 119 friends and 81 fans.

As the screenshot shows, only three people--one of them me (undecided--it's not my district)--answered the web site's online poll about people's priorities.

The platform

Hunley-Adossa's web site is long on biography and pictures of her in the community, long on generalities, short on policy. Her home page offers redundancies and banalities:

Delia M. Hunley-Adossa has a proven leadership record in the community as an advocate and a voice for this community. Speaking out against injustice and standing up when it counts. She believes the priorities for this community are Economy, Education, Affordable Housing and the Environment. Delia believes that people are always first.

It also describes the CBA in generalities, without mentioning Atlantic Yards (though the next paragraph does note that BEE is a partner on AY):
Chairperson of the Community Benefits Agreement Coalition

The Coalition was created to assist with the implementation of the Community Benefit Agreement and facilitate an ongoing dialogue between the Coalition and the Developers, the Coalition and the Developers established a working group known as the Executive Committee, comprised of representatives from the Coalition members and the Developers.

By contrast, Estiphanos addresses issues like the MTA, Education, and Housing, as well as "My Opponent"--criticizing James but ignoring Hunley-Adossa.

James uses a Facebook page for her campaign and has a Twitter feed, as well as the advantages of incumbency, like a Team Tish blog.

On video

Hunley-Adossa's statements in a video interview for Brooklyn Independent Television's Brooklyn Review (4/13/09) are similarly innocuous. "I want to see more amenities brought into the community," she says, also mouthing the mantra of "green jobs."

Estiphanos speaks with far more verve. James, for whatever reason, chose not to participate.

The narrator notes that Hunley-Adossa's campaign treasurer, Charlene Nimmons, also runs another group that signed the CBA, "causing some to accuse both of them of being loyal to Ratner." Um, I guess AYR is part of the "some." It's still a legitimate question, given that Forest City Ratner almost certainly pays their salaries.

The Boyland example & Musa Moore

In September 2006, I described how Boyland's campaign had been sending fliers and putting up posters in the 18th Senatorial District, while skirting the rules regarding campaign finance. Hunley-Adossa has been complying with the rules, but has been similarly unavailable.

The Local's Michael Szeto reported that he did reach Musa Moore, Hunley-Adossa’s campaign manager, who promised to put the candidate in touch, but it was not to be.

Moore has a long history in Brooklyn machine politics. In July 2006, Wayne Barrett of the Village Voice wrote about Brooklyn Democratic boss Clarence Norman (since convicted of extortion) and his ally, then-state Senator Carl Andrews.

In the article, headlined Andrews Amnesia: Why are the media giving the scandal-ridden Norman pal a pass?, Barrett wrote:

While Andrews and Boone were two of the Norman associates routinely placed on the payroll of Norman-endorsed candidates, the new star in that boutique business is Moses "Musa" Moore, who's collected over $370,000 from at least 18 candidates, most of it since 2005. At 34, Moore, who was also paid a total of $110,000 as a senate aide to Andrews until this January, is now coordinating the congressional campaign out of his Visibility Consulting storefront headquarters at 1622 Bedford Avenue. Moore is an Andrews protégé put on the senate payroll in November 2001, four months before Andrews formally assumed the senate seat vacated by Marty Markowitz, who was elected borough president in 2001. Marty Connor, the senate Democratic leader then, said Andrews asked that Moore be hired.

Moore worked on James's campaign in 2005. Now he's working for her rival.

(Update: I'm reminded that James was fined for overpaying Moore.)


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…