Skip to main content

ACORN, the disconnect in the crowd, and the absence of facts regarding affordable housing

The housing advocacy group ACORN sure inspires loyalty in its followers, given that dozens showed up last Wednesday, attired in red, to the public hearing held by the Empire State Development Corporation regarding  the Atlantic Yards project.

What ACORN does not do, however, is keep its members informed about details in the Atlantic Yards affordable housing agreement. Nor do those members apparently feel obligated to get their facts straight. Testimony from its members on Wednesday was heartfelt, but often distracting, erroneous, or even pie-in-the-sky.

There was a lot of cheering and chanting of "Build It Now." There weren't a lot of facts. Actually, there's been more faith--and, as I write below, there may be a theory to explain it.

(Photos by Tracy Collins)

One woman testified that "Forest City Ratner was shaken down" because it "paid market rate for housing." Not at all.

ACORN head Bertha Lewis said that all the rental units would be rent-stabilized. Not unimportant, but a distraction from the questions at issue:
--how long would it take for housing to be built?
--is the announced ten-year timetable remotely realistic?
--how much subsidy is needed and is it available?
--could the subsidies be steered to other projects to produce housing faster?

Also unmentioned: what would the rents actually be? The last time Lewis had to face questions about those numbers, more than three years ago, the crowd was quite disappointed. After all, most of the affordable housing--1350 out of 2250 announced units--would be unaffordable to the low-income people who make up the majority of ACORN's membership.

Also unmentioned: ACORN, by virtue of the 2005 Affordable Housing Memorandum of Understanding, is obligated to publicly support the project. Also, ACORN has been bailed out by Forest City Ratner, gaining $500,000 in grants and a $1 million low-interest loan.

Time for a decent apartment

One woman, a Ms. Boyd, testified poignantly, “I’m 72-and-a-half, and it’s time for me to get a decent apartment.”

Surely it is. But it's not realistic to expect that apartment to arrive via the Atlantic Yards project. 

Let's do some math. First, the ESDC acknowledges that the potential for a delayed buildout, in which only one tower gets constructed.

That would mean 200 subsidized units, with 20 of them designated for senior citizens. Given that half the affordable units are designed for people in the three adjacent community boards, that means Ms. Boyd--who's either in one category or another--has a shot at ten of those units.

But wait. If the units are distributed evenly across all the income bands--from 30% of Area Median Income (AMI) to 160% of AMI--only four of those senior citizen units would be low-income. (I'm assuming that Ms. Boyd, like most followers of ACORN, is in the low-income category, with income at 50% of AMI or lower.)

There would be only four apartments--or, perhaps, even fewer, in case some of them are studios designated for people living alone and others one- or two-bedroom units for seniors with family members.

Trusting the contract

Another member, George Finley, testified, "Just like [ACORN leader] Ms. Bertha Lewis got up here and told you that, no matter what you hear in the public, we have the original contract with Forest Ratner and the downtown community of Brooklyn."

There's no contract with the "downtown community" and, of course, the developer is Forest City Ratner. Finley apparently doesn't know that the "original contract" signed in 2005 included three scenarios, and that the first scenario announced was quickly dropped.

As I wrote in July 2006, no longer would 900 of the 2250 affordable apartments be promised to moderate-income people earning 50%-100% of the AMI.

Rather, only 450 units would go to moderate-income people, and 900 would be aimed to the middle-class, earning above the AMI. Thus, some 40% of the units in the affordable allotment would have relatively high rent; a family of four would pay more than than $2000 a month.

Ratner's willingness to deal

ACORN's Pat Boone testified, "I’m very very much afraid that if we do not allow this project to go through, thousands of people will not get affordable housing. Because of all the developments I’ve seen around in this neighborhood, nobody has spoken out against them."

It is an article of faith that Bruce Ratner was extraordinarily magnanimous in agreeing to include affordable housing, given that other developers nearby said no. The reason is that the other developers were able to build as of right, thanks to the rezoning of Downtown Brooklyn, which ACORN did not protest, as the Observer reported.

Other developers have been required to include subsidized housing as part of other rezonings. Atlantic Yards was essentially a privately negotiated rezoning, with a bonus in square footage for affordable housing. Ratner made promises and, in turn, got an organization willing to turn out its followers to cheer for the project, no matter what.

Source of affordable housing

Despite what Boone said, it's not a zero-sum game. If Atlantic Yards is not built, the housing subsidies can be directed to other affordable housing projects. As for the long-term creation of affordable housing, it may depend more on infrastructure improvements--such as the provision of new transportation options that spur building--than direct subsidies.

"We’re not going to stand by and try to have some agency take care of us," Lewis trumpeted. "ACORN will take care of us.”

It's the opposite. "Some agency" will have to supply subsidies to create affordable housing.

Notes toward a theory

Beyond the support for affordable housing in general, and beyond the financial and contractual obligations, is there any way to explain the fervor for this deal?

Exploring the history of subprime loans in her new book Our Lot: How Real Estate Came To Own Us, Brooklyn-based journalist Alyssa Katz writes:
The experience in neighborhoods confirmed what Fannie Mae's market research also was discovering. Borrowers who were new to homebuying, especially if they were members of minority groups, tended to care more about how they were treated by the person selling them a loan than about the financial soundness of the loan itself.

The parallel isn't direct, but instead of "borrowers new to homebuying" substitute "signatories to the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement (CBA)."

In this case, ACORN and other project supporters have frequently saluted Forest City Ratner's willingness to sit down at the table regarding something new, the CBA.

After that, however, most haven't looked closely or skeptically at a changing deal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…

Former ESDC CEO Lago returns to NYC to head City Planning Commission

Carl Weisbrod, Mayor Bill de Blasio's City Planning Commission Chairman and Director of the Department of City Planning, is resigning,

And he's being replaced by Marisa Lago, currently a federal official, but who Atlantic Yards-ologists remember as the short-term Empire State Development Corporation CEO who, in an impolitic but candid 2009 statement, acknowledged that the project would take "decades."

Still, Lago not long after that played the good soldier at a May 2009 Senate oversight hearing, justifying changes in the project but claiming the public benefits remained the same.

By returning to City Planning, Lago will join former ESDC General Counsel Anita Laremont, who after retiring from the state (and taking a pension) got the job with the city.

Back at planning

Lago, a lawyer, in 1983 began work as an aide to City Planning Chairman Herb Sturz, and later served as the General Counsel to the president of the NYC Economic Development Corporation, Weisbrod himself.