Skip to main content

MTA board member "concerned" about amended Vanderbilt Yard plans, says board has yet to be fully briefed

The one Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) board member who voted against the deal to award the Vanderbilt Yard to Forest City Ratner said he remains “concerned” about reports of amended plans, but can’t formulate his position on the issue until board members are provided with briefing materials in about two weeks.

Mitchell Pally, who represents Suffolk County, told me that, at the MTA board meeting last Wednesday, members were briefed verbally about negotiations regarding Forest City Ratner’s request for extending payments rather than paying the pledged $100 million at the time of closing. (Press reports have indicated FCR wants to pay just $20 million up front.)

He said board members were not briefed regarding a reconfigured Vanderbilt Yard replacement, though Williams testified Friday at a state Senate oversight hearing that the MTA and FCR reached an agreement—to go from the planned nine tracks to seven—before Memorial Day. Pally told me that, while the agreement had been reached by MTA management and staff, the board had not yet weighed in.

Losing bidder penalized?

His concerns about fairness, he explained, apply to any project, not merely the one under consideration: “When you have a variety of bids, and then changes are made, you end up with an amended situation which is significantly different, and penalizes the non-winner of the original bid. I don't know what is happening in this situation, but obviously that is a concern.”

(Noticing New York's Michael D.D. White offers several arguments about why compromising with Forest City Ratner might not be such a good deal for the public.)

Later this month

Pally said that, according to typical protocol, the deal would first be discussed at the MTA Finance Commitee meeting June 22, two days before the full board meeting June 24. Typically board members get summary materials during the previous week.

Pally said he recognized that the economic situation had changed, but suggested that the financial return to MTA should be compared against three things: the original bid, zero (meaning the deal fails), or a potential alternative.

Will the MTA provide board members with a cost-benefit analysis regarding the revised bid? “Obvious if the project changes, the benefits have to change,” Pally said, expressing hope that such details would be provided.

Vote in 2005

In 2005, Pally supported development at the Vanderbilt Yard, but voted against Forest City Ratner’s bid, because of the contrast between the $100 million cash offered by FCR, with an MTA appraisal at $214.5 million: “My concern was, were we getting fair market value for our asset?”

He said he had not supported the rival bid by Extell, which offered $150 million cash. “We never got to that point,” he said, noting that there was never a full analysis of the value--in cash and other benefits--for the Extell bid. But the appraisal, he said, was “very clear regarding what the property was worth, and I did not believe at that the current developer met that criteria.”

Pally’s prescience about delay

As the Brooklyn Paper reported, during a September 2005 board meeting, Pally questioned why the board didn’t insist on getting more money, or ensure that Forest City Ratner paid the full price up front. 

“Why is the MTA making closing contingent on these other bodies?” asked Pally at the time. “We don’t know when this sale will close. It could be two years, it could be five years, it could be 10 years.”

Indeed, it has been nearly four years.

As for a new railyard, one of the reasons MTA Chair Peter Kalikow touted the FCR bid, Pally pointed out that the MTA’s needs assessment had not mentioned upgrading the railyard.

Fast track

Pally indicated yesterday that the revised deal is on a fast track. “We were told that, at MTA, decisions have to be made rather quickly, because of a variety of dates,” he said. 

Those dates could be the Empire State Development Corporation’s need to issue a revised Modified General Project Plan (Plan) as a prelude to a public hearing and condemnation, on a schedule designed to ensure that arena bonds are issued before a crucial December 31 deadline.

Is this basically a done deal? Pally said there was significant backing, from both the political structure and from many individual board members, for the project, and to make changes to continue to make it happen. “What those changes are I don’t know yet, and how they’d impact the project,” he said.

FCR’s payments

As I wrote last month, according to the ESDC’s Modified GPP, Forest City is supposed to consummate its purchase prior to or contemporaneously with the first acquisition by ESDC of a parcel not owned by the MTA--presumably by eminent domain.

The 9/15/05 sale letter indicates that, of the $100 million, a 10% non-refundable deposit was payable on contract execution and the balance at the closing.

The contract, apparently, will be executed at closing, an MTA spokesman told me--essentially conflating the two events.

When is closing? Only after the completion of all approvals, including a GPP. Given that there may be another GPP, closing may have to wait until later this year.

The deal was once expected to close at the end of 2007. It looks to be nearly two years late.


Popular posts from this blog

Forest City acknowledges unspecified delays in Pacific Park, cites $300 million "impairment" in project value; what about affordable housing pledge?

Updated Monday Nov. 7 am: Note follow-up coverage of stock price drop and investor conference call and pending questions.

Pacific Park Brooklyn is seriously delayed, Forest City Realty Trust said yesterday in a news release, which further acknowledged that the project has caused a $300 million impairment, or write-down of the asset, as the expected revenues no longer exceed the carrying cost.

The Cleveland-based developer, parent of Brooklyn-based Forest City Ratner, which is a 30% investor in Pacific Park along with 70% partner/overseer Greenland USA, blamed the "significant impairment" on an oversupply of market-rate apartments, the uncertain fate of the 421-a tax break, and a continued increase in construction costs.

While the delay essentially confirms the obvious, given that two major buildings have not launched despite plans to do so, it raises significant questions about the future of the project, including:
if market-rate construction is delayed, will the affordable h…

Revising official figures, new report reveals Nets averaged just 11,622 home fans last season, Islanders drew 11,200 (and have option to leave in 2018)

The Brooklyn Nets drew an average of only 11,622 fans per home game in their most recent (and lousy) season, more than 23% below the announced official attendance figure, and little more than 65% of the Barclays Center's capacity.

The New York Islanders also drew some 19.4% below announced attendance, or 11,200 fans per home game.

The surprising numbers were disclosed in a consultant's report attached to the Preliminary Official Statement for the refinancing of some $462 million in tax-exempt bonds for the Barclays Center (plus another $20 million in taxable bonds). The refinancing should lower costs to Mikhail Prokhorov, owner of the arena operating company, by and average of $3.4 million a year through 2044 in paying off arena construction.

According to official figures, the Brooklyn Nets attendance averaged 17,187 in the debut season, 2012-13, 17,251 in 2013-14, 17,037 in 2014-15, and 15,125 in the most recent season, 2015-16. For hoops, the arena holds 17,732.

But official…

At 550 Vanderbilt, big chunk of apartments pitched to Chinese buyers as "international units"

One key to sales at the 550 Vanderbilt condo is the connection to China, thanks to Shanghai-based developer Greenland Holdings.

It's the parent of Greenland USA, which as part of Greenland Forest City Partners owns 70% of Pacific Park (except 461 Dean and the arena).

And sales in China may help explain how the developer was able to claim early momentum.
"Since 550 Vanderbilt launched pre-sales in June [2015], more than 80 residences have gone into contract, representing over 30% of the building’s 278 total residences," the developer said in a 9/25/15 press release announcing the opening of a sales gallery in Brooklyn. "The strong response from the marketplace indicates the high level of demand for well-designed new luxury homes in Brooklyn..."

Maybe. Or maybe it just meant a decent initial pipeline to Chinese buyers.

As lawyer Jay Neveloff, who represents Forest City, told the Real Deal in 2015, a project involving a Chinese firm "creates a huge market for…

Is Barclays Center dumping the Islanders, or are they renegotiating? Evidence varies (bond doc, cash receipts); NHL attendance biggest variable

The Internet has been abuzz since Bloomberg's Scott Soshnick reported 1/30/17, using an overly conclusory headline, that Brooklyn’s Barclays Center Is Dumping the Islanders.

That would end an unusual arrangement in which the arena agrees to pay the team a fixed sum (minus certain expenses), in exchange for keeping tickets, suite, and sponsorship revenue.

The arena would earn more without the hockey team, according to Bloomberg, which cited “a financial projection shared with potential investors showed the Islanders won’t contribute any revenue after the 2018-19 season--a clear signal that the team won’t play there, the people said."

That "signal," however, is hardly definitive, as are the media leaks about a prospective new arena in Queens, as shown in the screenshot below from Newsday. Both sides are surely pushing for advantage, if not bluffing.

Consider: the arena and the Islanders can't even formally begin their opt-out talks until after this season. The disc…

Skanska says it "expected to assemble a properly designed modular building, not engage in an iterative R&D experiment"

On 12/10/16, I noted that FastCo.Design's Prefab's Moment of Reckoning article dialed back the gush on the 461 Dean modular tower compared to the publication's previous coverage.

Still, I noted that the article relied on developer Forest City Ratner and architect SHoP to put the best possible spin on what was clearly a failure. From the article: At the project's outset, it took the factory (managed by Skanska at the time) two to three weeks to build a module. By the end, under FCRC's management, the builders cut that down to six days. "The project took a little longer than expected and cost a little bit more than expected because we started the project with the wrong contractor," [Forest City's Adam] Greene says.Skanska jabs back
Well, Forest City's estranged partner Skanska later weighed in--not sure whether they weren't asked or just missed a deadline--and their article was updated 12/13/16. Here's Skanska's statement, which shows th…

Not just logistics: bypassing Brooklyn for DNC 2016 also saved on optics (role of Russian oligarch, Shanghai government)

Surely the logistical challenges of holding a national presidential nominating convention in Brooklyn were the main (and stated) reasons for the Democratic National Committee's choice of Philadelphia.

And, as I wrote in NY Slant, the huge security cordon in Philadelphia would have been impossible in Brooklyn.

But consider also the optics. As I wrote in my 1/21/15 op-ed in the Times arguing that the choice of Brooklyn was a bad idea:
The arena also raises ethically sticky questions for the Democrats. While the Barclays Center is owned primarily by Forest City Ratner, 45 percent of it is owned by the Russian billionaire Mikhail D. Prokhorov (who also owns 80 percent of the Brooklyn Nets). Mr. Prokhorov has a necessarily cordial relationship with Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — though he has been critical of Mr. Putin in the past, last year, at the Russian president’s request, he tried to transfer ownership of the Nets to one of his Moscow-based companies. An oligarch-owned a…